Decisions/2025-501
Report2025-501

What is Portland deciding about present audit of the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025 and related communications?

This is a presentation to Council of the results of the independent financial audit conducted by Baker Tilly of the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.No legislation is being proposed. No Council action is requested on the financial audit.Portland is required by state law to have an annual audit of its financial statements. Management prepares the financial statements and an outside public accounting firm audits them. By Charter, the City Auditor oversees the selection of the outside audit firm and manages the audit contract.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Present audit of the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025 and related communications

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

This is a presentation to Council of the results of the independent financial audit conducted by Baker Tilly of the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.No legislation is being proposed. No Council action is requested on the financial audit.Portland is required by state law to have an annual audit of its financial statements. Management prepares the financial statements and an outside public accounting firm audits them. By Charter, the City Auditor oversees the selection of the outside audit firm and manages the audit contract.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

Reporting the outcome of the independent annual audit of the City’s financial statements to City Council and the public will benefit Portland community members by improving City accountability.The objectives, scope, and methodology of the financial audit are driven by the requirements of City Charter as well as state and federal law. As a result, it is a legal requirement that these audits be conducted independently and in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Direct public involvement was not applicable in conducting financial audit work.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Placed on file

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

No named decision vote is linked yet.

A missing vote is not treated as approval, opposition, or evidence of a Councilor’s position.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This presentation on the financial audit does not have a financial or budgetary impact.The cost of this financial audit was reported to Council with Ordinance No. 190726 on March 2, 2022 to approve Contract No. 30008009 with Moss Adams (now post-merger Contract No. 30009238 with Baker Tilly) to conduct the financial and federal compliance audits relating to fiscal year 2021-22 through fiscal year 2025-26. The cost of the City’s financial audit is covered by the current budget for the Office of the City Auditor.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionReport 2025-501

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

TO THE COUNCIL: I am pleased to present the results of the annual audit of the City of Portland’s financial statements for fiscal year 2024-25.The City received a clean audit opinion from the public accounting firm Baker Tilly that conducted the audit. This would mean the statements are an accurate reflection of the City’s finances. Auditors, however, found material weaknesses in the internal controls over financial reporting that will be detailed in Baker Tilly's letter to you, called Communications with Those Charged with Governance.Portland is required by state law to have an annual audit of its financial statements. Staff from the Accounting Division in the Office of the Chief Financial Officer prepares the financial statements, also called the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. The outside public accounting firm audits them. By Charter, the City Auditor oversees the selection of the outside audit firm and manages their contract.Baker Tilly Principal Keith Simovic will present more detailed audit results at the December 18, 2025 meeting of the City Council.The audit report will also be included within the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, which is prepared by management and will be available on the website of the Accounting Division after December 16, 2025: https://www.portland.gov/accounting/finance-reports. No Council action is requested.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 0 votes
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

An implementation owner or milestone was not found deterministically.

Unknown
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:08 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:27 AM PDT
Evidence hash
7735ac73674d228a
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Placed on file

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Placed on file