Final-action roll calls · January 2025 → today
Who votes together—and where.
Explore each councilor’s record by topic, the pairs that repeatedly align on divided votes, and the issues where Council finds the most and least agreement. Every pattern is linked back to the public record.
321final actions analyzed
Issue landscape
Ranked by share of divided final actionsWhere Council divides most.
A divided vote contains at least one yes and one no. A higher rate means Council divided more often on matters in that topic—not that every disagreement was equally consequential.
01
Public safety14 divided · 37 final actions
38%02Housing & homelessness6 divided · 29 final actions
21%03Transportation & public works14 divided · 69 final actions
20%04Arts, parks & community life1 divided · 5 final actions
20%05Government & democracy6 divided · 32 final actions
19%06Economy & business2 divided · 11 final actions
18%07Budget, taxes & finance10 divided · 59 final actions
17%08Climate & environment3 divided · 20 final actions
15%09Labor & city workforce3 divided · 21 final actions
14%10Land use & permitting2 divided · 18 final actions
11%Selected issue record
Public safety
Police, fire, emergency response, community safety, and violence prevention.
38%of final actions were divided14 of 37 roll calls
23 no recorded dissent 14 divided2 decided within two votes
Councilor by councilor
Tap any councilor for their full recordThe voting record on public safety.
A yes rate is not a “pro-topic” score: each roll call asks a different question. These cards report how each member voted on the proposals grouped here.
Candace AvalosDistrict 1
- Yes
- 33
- No
- 4
- Participated
- 37
Jamie DunphyDistrict 1
- Yes
- 36
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 37
Loretta SmithDistrict 1
- Yes
- 34
- No
- 2
- Participated
- 36
Dan RyanDistrict 2
- Yes
- 34
- No
- 3
- Participated
- 37
Elana Pirtle-GuineyDistrict 2
- Yes
- 35
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 35
Sameer KanalDistrict 2
- Yes
- 33
- No
- 4
- Participated
- 37
Angelita MorilloDistrict 3
- Yes
- 34
- No
- 2
- Participated
- 36
Steve NovickDistrict 3
- Yes
- 35
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 35
Tiffany Koyama LaneDistrict 3
- Yes
- 31
- No
- 2
- Participated
- 33
Eric ZimmermanDistrict 4
- Yes
- 29
- No
- 5
- Participated
- 34
Mitch GreenDistrict 4
- Yes
- 34
- No
- 2
- Participated
- 36
Olivia ClarkDistrict 4
- Yes
- 30
- No
- 3
- Participated
- 33
Implicit voting coalitions
Divided public safety votes onlyWho lands on the same side.
These are observed voting alignments, not claims of an organized or explicit coalition. The calculation adjusts for each member’s underlying tendency to vote yes.
Most aligned pairs
100%voted together
13 of 13 shared divided votes
100%voted together
11 of 11 shared divided votes
100%voted together
10 of 10 shared divided votes
100%voted together
11 of 11 shared divided votes
Most often on opposite sides
31%voted together
4 of 13 shared divided votes
31%voted together
4 of 13 shared divided votes
36%voted together
4 of 11 shared divided votes
The underlying decisions
Search all votes Recent divided matters.
- 11–1yes–no
- 8–4yes–no
- 7–5yes–no
- 2026-126*Add Code to establish the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (add Code Chapter 3.23)9–2yes–no
- 10–2yes–no