Recorded · 5–0
Who voted and on what
Motion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (5): Morillo, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney)
The goal of this ordinance is to ensure there is greater price stability on the items many communities rely on. Dynamic and surveillance pricing has the potential to create financial strains on all Portlanders, with the impacts most acutely felt by working communities, underrepresented communities, and those living on fixed incomes. Individuals and organizations representing working people communities have brought concerns forward about this practice and asked that Council address it.
Official community impact statementThis ordinance does not adjust or reallocate resources for staffing. Implementation by the administration may require prioritization of allocated resources as businesses come into compliance with regulatory framework outlined in the code. The administration should consider budget proposals for the FY27 implementation if the administration deems it necessary.
Official financial impact statementMotion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (5): Morillo, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney)
Official title: Add regulation of dynamic pricing and prohibition of surveillance pricing in Retail Code (add Code Chapter 7.28)
Ordinance 2026-308Current proposal · Portland.govThe City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:There is an increasing concern among Portland residents about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and personal data in technology, especially when it comes to consumer interactions with retailers and access to critical goods such as food, medicine, household items, etc.Between inflation, tariffs, supply chain issues, and dynamics in the economy, the cost of living has increased markedly in recent years on a wide array of goods and services. Portland residents report that affordability is one of their top concerns and that many are struggling to keep up with the financial demands of current times.Certain price-setting tools put an additional cost burden on Portland residents and increase the risk of price discrimination if individuals are charged a higher amount based on their identification with protected classes or demographic groups.The City has a vested interest in protecting its residents and communities from consumer practices which can be exploitative and discriminatory. The price of an item should be based on the cost of producing the item, not on who is buying it.This City Council has a precedent of acting in the interest of consumers, such as when it banned the use of certain algorithmic devices in establishing rental amounts for housing purposes in Ordinance 192122. Additionally, there is a precedent for states and jurisdictions across the nation prohibiting or limiting surveillance and dynamic pricing among retailers, as documented in New York, Connecticut, and Maryland.Price decreases in the forms of coupons, discounts, and loyalty programs are beneficial to both Portland residents and retailers and should be permitted.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Add City Code Chapter 7.28 as shown in Exhibit A, also known as the Consumers Opposed to Surveillance Technology (COST) Ordinance.
Motion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (5): Morillo, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney) Motion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Morillo 1, inclusive of Zimmerman 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (2): Morillo, Avalos; Nay (3): Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass. Motion to refer the Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2026-308, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (4): Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Morillo)
Motion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (5): Morillo, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Morillo 1, inclusive of Zimmerman 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (2): Morillo, Avalos; Nay (3): Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to refer the Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2026-308, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (4): Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Morillo)
Motion to amend the Ordinance 2026-308 as shown in Morillo 1, inclusive of Zimmerman 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (2): Morillo, Avalos; Nay (3): Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to refer the Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2026-308, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (4): Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Morillo)
0 human-reviewed findings are linked to this record. Unreviewed machine-extracted fragments are not presented as findings.
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
6 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.
The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
Referred to City Council as amended on September 22, 2026 by City Life Committee
Referred to City Council as amended
Referred to City Life Committee by Council President
Referred to City Life Committee by Council President
Independent guide by Portland Civic Lab. Official City records are authoritative. Votes alone do not establish a Councilor’s reasons.