The new voter-mandated Oversight System consists of two branches: the Office of Community-Based Police Accountability (OCPA) and the Community Board for Police Accountability (CBPA). One of the Board's initial responsibilities will be hiring a Director to oversee the staff and operations of the OCPA. Portland City Code Title 35 outlines the roles and responsibilities for investigators in the OCPA and introduces a new classification within the City's structure: the Oversight Navigator. Establishing these classifications for OCPA, now, will give the Director the flexibility to hire as soon as they are ready, better ensuring the office becomes operational in a timely manner.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland create three new classifications and establish compensation ranges for an Investigator I, Investigator II, and Oversight Navigator within the Office of…
The new voter-mandated Oversight System consists of two branches: the Office of Community-Based Police Accountability (OCPA) and the Community Board for Police Accountability (CBPA). One of the Board's initial responsibilities will be hiring a Director to oversee the staff and operations of the OCPA. Portland City Code Title 35 outlines the roles and responsibilities for investigators in the OCPA and introduces a new classification within the City's structure: the Oversight Navigator. Establishing these classifications for OCPA, now, will give the Director the flexibility to hire as soon as they are ready, better ensuring the office becomes operational in a timely manner.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Create three new classifications and establish compensation ranges for an Investigator I, Investigator II, and Oversight Navigator within the Office of Community-based Police Accountability
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns public safety and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThere was an extensive public process for community members and stakeholders who provided their critiques and comments in support of the Oversight System. These classifications will support the staffing and operational component required to deliver the voter-approved services. These classifications will independently, promptly, fairly and impartially investigate sworn employees and supervisors within the Portland Police Bureau with a primary focus on community concerns.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Referred · 5–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-065, back to the Office of the Mayor: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith). Item referred back to the Office of Mayor Wilson.
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
The creation of these classifications does not present a financial or budgetary impact that is not beyond the existing authorized budget. The Oversight System budget of $14.8 million dollars is proportional to five percent of the concurrently adopted Portland Police Bureau's annual operating budget. The amount of funding needed for staffing within OCPA is not yet determined. The OCPA Director will determine how many positions are needed for each classification.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What amendments, conditions, or new evidence could change the proposal before final action?
Check the official Council agenda for current testimony instructions and deadlines; this guide is not official testimony.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents3 sources
The proposed legal text currently moving through Council.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:In accordance with the policies established by the City Council and based on a classification and compensation review, the Bureau of Human Resources is creating three new classifications for which compensation rates need to be established.This compensation range is necessary for the new classifications, which are created to support staffing and operations for the Office of Community-based Police Accountability (OCPA). The pay rates and ranges will be consistent with the City's Pay Equity Policy as determined by Bureau of Human Resources Classification and Compensation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: The following compensation is authorized for the following classifications newly created by Bureau of Human Resources:Job Class - Oversight NavigatorHourly Pay Range - $28.35 to $38.24 Annual Pay Range - $58,968.00 to $79,539.20Job Class - OCPA Investigator IHourly Pay Range - $34.20 to $48.11Annual Pay Range - $71,136.00 to $100,068.80Job Class - OCPA Investigator II Hourly Pay Range - $44.38 to $56.38Annual Pay Range - $92,310.40 to $117,270.40
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 1 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-065, back to the Office of the Mayor: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith). Item referred back to the Office of Mayor Wilson.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Feb 12, 20265 yes
Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-065, back to the Office of the Mayor: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith). Item referred back to the Office of Mayor Wilson.
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
2 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:07 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:26 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- b9bcb886c4190dcd
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Referred
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Referred to Mayor