Decisions/2025-047
Resolution2025-047

Should Portland direct the City Attorney’s Office to seek required approvals related to the Settlement Agreement with the United States Department of Justice and comply…

The purpose of the Resolution is to direct the City Attorney’s Office to seek required approvals for amendments to Portland City Code, to implement an oversight system to investigate and make disciplinary decisions for Portland Police Bureau sworn employees and supervisors thereof. This Resolution also directs the City Attorney’s Office to comply with any mandatory collective bargaining obligations that relate to these amendments of the City Code. The potential amendments would allow Council to define more clearly the bias(es) that may serve as cause not to nominate an applicant for Board membership, or cause to remove a seated Board member. It also would allow Council to determine how it appoints community members to the nominating committee (other than the initial nominating committee) for the Board's membership. Finally, it would restore one community member (for a total of five) to the nominating committee, which would take effect for nominating committees after the first nominating committee appointed in 2025 unless the appointment will not delay the work of the initial nominating committee.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Direct the City Attorney’s Office to seek required approvals related to the Settlement Agreement with the United States Department of Justice and comply with any mandatory collective bargaining obligations for amendments to City Code related to the Community Police Oversight Board

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The purpose of the Resolution is to direct the City Attorney’s Office to seek required approvals for amendments to Portland City Code, to implement an oversight system to investigate and make disciplinary decisions for Portland Police Bureau sworn employees and supervisors thereof. This Resolution also directs the City Attorney’s Office to comply with any mandatory collective bargaining obligations that relate to these amendments of the City Code. The potential amendments would allow Council to define more clearly the bias(es) that may serve as cause not to nominate an applicant for Board membership, or cause to remove a seated Board member. It also would allow Council to determine how it appoints community members to the nominating committee (other than the initial nominating committee) for the Board's membership. Finally, it would restore one community member (for a total of five) to the nominating committee, which would take effect for nominating committees after the first nominating committee appointed in 2025 unless the appointment will not delay the work of the initial nominating committee.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The current and former Councils received substantial community input through this process, including through the Police Accountability Commission process, which yielded 1500+ Portlanders' input, town halls during the 2023-2024 Council's review and changes to the proposed Code totaling ~50 Portlanders in attendance, and subsequently several comments to the new Council asking for changes, primarily to define "bias."The change would allow for additional community representation on the nominating committee, and allow for community members to have more certainty about their eligibility for service on the new Community Board for Police Accountability.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Placed on file as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

No named decision vote is linked yet.

A missing vote is not treated as approval, opposition, or evidence of a Councilor’s position.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This legislation does not require changes to current FTE or budgets and does not result in new financial obligations.Under Charter 2-10, funding for the Oversight System shall be proportional to be no less than 5 percent of the Police Bureau’s Annual Operational Budget.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents4 sources
Final legal actionResolution 2025-047

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

WHEREAS, on July 30th, 2020 the Portland City Council voted to refer a Charter Amendment to the voters of Portland authorizing the creation of a police oversight system to promptly, fairly, and impartially investigate and impose discipline on Portland Police Bureau sworn employees and supervisors thereof and to make recommendations regarding police directives with a primary focus on community concerns; andWHEREAS, on November 3rd, 2020 Portland voters approved the Charter Amendment supporting the measure by 81.58%; andWHEREAS, on July 28, 2021, Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 37548, creating the Police Accountability Commission (PAC) to develop recommendations and suggested code provisions for the new oversight system; andWHEREAS, the PAC members, supported by dedicated staff in the Community Safety Division, worked diligently and tirelessly at their assigned task from December 2021 through August 2023; andWHEREAS, on April 29, 2022, the United States District Court in the United States v. City of Portland, Oregon, entered amendments to the settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement) between the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the City of Portland (City), including paragraph 195 which requires the City to implement the Charter Amendments establishing a community police oversight board; andWHEREAS, on September 21, 2023, the PAC presented to Council its 504-page report (440 pages of which were appendices documenting their work) and a recommended 96-page City Code package to create the Community Board for Police Accountability and Office of Community-led Police Accountability; and after hearing the report presentation, discussing the recommendations with PAC members, and taking community testimony, the Council unanimously voted to accept the report; andWHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement requires Council to seek approval from the DOJ of proposed amendments to the City Code to implement the Charter Amendments, and to comply with any corresponding bargaining obligation that may exist; andWHEREAS, on November 15, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 37637, which directed the City Attorney to seek approvals of Settlement Agreement and City Code amendments from the US Department of Justice and, as applicable the Federal Court, and comply with collective bargaining obligations; andWHEREAS, on August 29, 2024, the Federal Court held a fairness hearing to consider amendments to the Settlement Agreement to incorporate the Oversight System and at the conclusion of the hearing the Court adopted the amendments; andWHEREAS, on October 11, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance 191892, creating Code Title 35; andWHEREAS, the previous City Council’s authorization of Code included significant deviations from the recommendations of the Police Accountability Commission, and members of the public felt the Code was not consistent with the vision of the Charter amendments in 2020 and the will of the voters; andWHEREAS, it is vital to ensure that prospective Board members are able to hear and make decisions on the matters before the CBPA without bias; andWHEREAS, a clear and consistent definition of "bias" is necessary to ensure this impartiality, and the effectiveness of the new community police oversight board; andWHEREAS, the recommended City Code amendments, attached as Exhibit A, will implement the will of the voters as reflected in the Charter Amendments to establish a community police oversight board, and create a fair and impartial community-led oversight system where imposed discipline can be upheld;NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Council directs the City Attorney’s Office, after consideration with Council staff of community feedback, to seek required approvals from the United States Department of Justice for amendments to the City Code in a form substantially similar to Exhibit A, andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Attorney’s Office and Bureau of Human Resources, after consideration with Council staff of community feedback, are hereby authorized to comply with any collective bargaining obligations the City may have and to reach agreement on the terms of the proposed City Code amendments in a form substantially similar to Exhibit A; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, upon completion of its engagement with the DOJ and any mandatory collective bargaining obligations, the City Attorney’s Office shall return to Council for adoption of the City Code amendments approved by DOJ.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 0 votes

Recorded amendments

Feb 25, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A to replace Code Subsection 35.20.010 F.3. with the following: “Any individual who displays a state of mind that indicates the individual could not reach decisions as a member of the CBPA impartially, without prejudice, and without a basis in bias. In order to determine whether the individual has such a state of mind, the nominating committee will consider, among other factors, whether an individual’s prior statements regarding law enforcement demonstrate an inability to be impartial.”: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (3) Kanal, Morillo, Novick; Nay (2) Smith, Zimmerman)

Read all 1 exact motions
Feb 25, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A to replace Code Subsection 35.20.010 F.3. with the following: “Any individual who displays a state of mind that indicates the individual could not reach decisions as a member of the CBPA impartially, without prejudice, and without a basis in bias. In order to determine whether the individual has such a state of mind, the nominating committee will consider, among other factors, whether an individual’s prior statements regarding law enforcement demonstrate an inability to be impartial.”: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (3) Kanal, Morillo, Novick; Nay (2) Smith, Zimmerman)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

3 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.

Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:04 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:22 AM PDT
Evidence hash
8a6109e4af30dddf
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Placed on file as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Continued as amended