This provides direction for development of an annual strategic planning process for the City Council, that will include a shared set of strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting?
This provides direction for development of an annual strategic planning process for the City Council, that will include a shared set of strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns other city business and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordAlthough the strategic priority setting process itself will be administrative in nature, the process will occur through a series of public meetings and therefore will engage the community throughout. The process of the full City Council discussing their shared priorities in public meetings aligns with the City's core values of transparency, accountability and collaboration.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 10–2
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2025-441: Adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
Council's strategic process is not anticipated to have a direct fiscal impact.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
WHEREAS, City Council is responsible for guiding and informing the city's priority and policy direction; andWHEREAS, the current schedule of Council meetings, work sessions, and Committee meetings does not allow sufficient time and space for the elected body to conduct strategic priority setting and future planning; andWHEREAS, City Council's agenda and legislative work can shift in response to real time events affecting the city and communities. A public and adopted strategic framework would enable Council to quickly respond to emerging needs, then refocus back to annual strategic priorities; andWHEREAS, it is the responsibility of Council to develop strategic direction that guides sound policy development; andWHEREAS, in the spirit of the City's core values of transparency, accountability and collaboration, City Council will discuss their strategic priorities in an annual public process.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, City Council will meet annually in January following the election of the Council President and Vice President for the express intent of setting the strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes for the following 12 months; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the annual strategic priority setting meetings will consist of no less than one meeting with the option of additional meetings as needed; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Council policy committees may be suspended during this timeframe to provide the time and capacity for full Council to focus on strategic priority setting, with special consideration for emergent issues identified by policy committee leadership, City operational obligations, and other policies which may be addressed at full Council and bypass policy committees until the strategic priority framework is adopted or until January 31; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this council operating procedure will be a component of the Council Handbook; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the strategic planning meetings will invite the City Administrator and their designee(s) as subject matter experts to contribute to Council discussions; and Kanal Ryan- Friendly Amendment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council President, Vice President, and City Administrator will jointly determine facilitator(s) for the strategic planning meetings; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the facilitator will guide the process of 1) identifying Councilors' individual operating values and key priorities, 2) identifying Council shared values and priorities, and 3) producing a set of core priorities that will serve as Council's strategic framework; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the final strategic priority framework shall clearly identify areas of consensus, areas of divergence, and unresolved priorities.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council President or Vice President in coordination with the facilitator will place on a Council agenda Council's strategic framework as a resolution by February 28 each year; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the approval of the annual framework including Council strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes in no way prohibits councilors from creating or developing their own legislation. If the annual strategic framework resolution fails to be adopted, the Council may resume Council meetings and Policy Committees on their regular schedules; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this strategic priority-setting process shall be reviewed by Council after its first year of implementation, including an evaluation of its impacts on equity, committee autonomy, and legislative responsiveness, with Council retaining the authority to amend or repeal the process.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council President or Vice President may present a new Policy Committee structure based on the approved strategic framework.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 11 votes
Recorded amendments
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal-Ryan 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 3: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Clark, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 4: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Ryan 1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Koyama-Lane. (Aye (1): Koyama-Lane; Nay (4): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.2: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Clark, Dunphy, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.3: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-441, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Clark. (Aye (4): Clark, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Dunphy)
Read all 11 exact motions
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal-Ryan 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 3: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Clark, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 4: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Ryan 1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to divide Kanal 1 to vote on Kanal 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 separately: Moved by Clark.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Koyama-Lane. (Aye (1): Koyama-Lane; Nay (4): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.2: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Clark, Dunphy, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.3: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-441, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Clark. (Aye (4): Clark, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Dunphy)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 18, 202512 yes
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal-Ryan 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 18, 20258 yes · 3 no · 1 absent
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 3: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Clark, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 18, 20255 yes · 6 no · 1 absent
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 4: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 18, 20256 yes · 6 no
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 18, 20258 yes · 4 no
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Final Council action · Dec 18, 202510 yes · 2 no
Final action on 2025-441: Adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 8, 20255 yes
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Ryan 1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 8, 20251 yes · 4 no
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Koyama-Lane. (Aye (1): Koyama-Lane; Nay (4): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 8, 20254 yes · 1 no
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.2: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Clark, Dunphy, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 8, 20255 yes
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.3: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 8, 20254 yes · 1 no
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-441, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Clark. (Aye (4): Clark, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Dunphy)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:08 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:27 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- 7d81d81b43ce2ca9
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Adopted as amended by council
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Adopted as amended
- Council Action
Referred to City Council as amended
- Council Action
Continued