Adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting
Adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting
Derived from official scheduling fields
3 Council session appearances; latest Dec 18, 2025.
Decision readiness
This measures whether decision-relevant information is visible. It does not measure whether the proposal deserves approval.
The requested action could not be determined.
Official text was found in the reviewed record.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
Funding information appears in the impact statement; inspect the source for precision.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
Implementation language appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
Not found in the reviewed official text.
Not found in the reviewed official text.
Not found in the reviewed official text.
Not found in the reviewed official text.
- If the annual strategic framework resolution fails to be adopted, the Council may resume Council meetings and Policy Committees on their regular schedules; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this strategic priority-setting process shall be reviewed by Council after its first year of implementation, including an evaluation of its impacts on equity, committee autonomy, and legislative responsiveness, with Council retaining the authority to amend or repeal the process.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council President or Vice President may present a new Policy Committee structure based on the approved strategic framework.
Not found in the reviewed official text.
Not found in the reviewed official text.
Documents
Official page textRead
WHEREAS, City Council is responsible for guiding and informing the city's priority and policy direction; andWHEREAS, the current schedule of Council meetings, work sessions, and Committee meetings does not allow sufficient time and space for the elected body to conduct strategic priority setting and future planning; andWHEREAS, City Council's agenda and legislative work can shift in response to real time events affecting the city and communities. A public and adopted strategic framework would enable Council to quickly respond to emerging needs, then refocus back to annual strategic priorities; andWHEREAS, it is the responsibility of Council to develop strategic direction that guides sound policy development; andWHEREAS, in the spirit of the City's core values of transparency, accountability and collaboration, City Council will discuss their strategic priorities in an annual public process.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, City Council will meet annually in January following the election of the Council President and Vice President for the express intent of setting the strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes for the following 12 months; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the annual strategic priority setting meetings will consist of no less than one meeting with the option of additional meetings as needed; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Council policy committees may be suspended during this timeframe to provide the time and capacity for full Council to focus on strategic priority setting, with special consideration for emergent issues identified by policy committee leadership, City operational obligations, and other policies which may be addressed at full Council and bypass policy committees until the strategic priority framework is adopted or until January 31; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this council operating procedure will be a component of the Council Handbook; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the strategic planning meetings will invite the City Administrator and their designee(s) as subject matter experts to contribute to Council discussions; and Kanal Ryan- Friendly Amendment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council President, Vice President, and City Administrator will jointly determine facilitator(s) for the strategic planning meetings; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the facilitator will guide the process of 1) identifying Councilors' individual operating values and key priorities, 2) identifying Council shared values and priorities, and 3) producing a set of core priorities that will serve as Council's strategic framework; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the final strategic priority framework shall clearly identify areas of consensus, areas of divergence, and unresolved priorities.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council President or Vice President in coordination with the facilitator will place on a Council agenda Council's strategic framework as a resolution by February 28 each year; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the approval of the annual framework including Council strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes in no way prohibits councilors from creating or developing their own legislation. If the annual strategic framework resolution fails to be adopted, the Council may resume Council meetings and Policy Committees on their regular schedules; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this strategic priority-setting process shall be reviewed by Council after its first year of implementation, including an evaluation of its impacts on equity, committee autonomy, and legislative responsiveness, with Council retaining the authority to amend or repeal the process.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council President or Vice President may present a new Policy Committee structure based on the approved strategic framework.
Motions, amendments & votes
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal-Ryan 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 3: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Clark, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 4: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Ryan 1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to divide Kanal 1 to vote on Kanal 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 separately: Moved by Clark.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Koyama-Lane. (Aye (1): Koyama-Lane; Nay (4): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.2: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Clark, Dunphy, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.3: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-441, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Clark. (Aye (4): Clark, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Dunphy)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal-Ryan 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 3: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (8): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Clark, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Avalos 4: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Koyama-Lane. (Aye (1): Koyama-Lane; Nay (4): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.3: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-441, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Clark. (Aye (4): Clark, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Dunphy)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Ryan 1: Moved by Clark and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama-Lane, Ryan)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1.2: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Clark, Dunphy, Koyama-Lane, Ryan; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)
Final action on 2025-441: Adopt procedure for annual Council strategic priority setting
Money & effects
This provides direction for development of an annual strategic planning process for the City Council, that will include a shared set of strategic priorities, objectives and outcomes.
Not applicable
Although the strategic priority setting process itself will be administrative in nature, the process will occur through a series of public meetings and therefore will engage the community throughout. The process of the full City Council discussing their shared priorities in public meetings aligns with the City's core values of transparency, accountability and collaboration.
Council's strategic process is not anticipated to have a direct fiscal impact.
Not applicable
Implementation & accountability
The reviewed source does not identify a responsible City organization.
If the annual strategic framework resolution fails to be adopted, the Council may resume Council meetings and Policy Committees on their regular schedules; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this strategic priority-setting process shall be reviewed by Council after its first year of implementation, including an evaluation of its impacts on equity, committee autonomy, and legislative responsiveness, with Council retaining the authority to amend or repeal the process.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council President or Vice President may present a new Policy Committee structure based on the approved strategic framework.
Council's strategic process is not anticipated to have a direct fiscal impact.
Timeline
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Adopted as amended
- Council Action
Referred to City Council as amended
- Council Action
Continued