Decisions/2025-252
Ordinance2025-252

Should Portland declare property located near the intersection of N Midway Ave and N Columbia Blvd as surplus property and authorize the Bureau of Transportation to…

The City, through the Bureau of Transportation, desires to declare the 2,548 sq.ft. property, R151411, as surplus and dispose of the property for fair market value. The property consists of an area quitclaimed from the Oregon State Highway Commission in 1948 via a Quitclaim Deed, Book 1270, Page 76, and a portion of land vacated in 2018 under adopted Ordinance 188038 and recorded as Document #2018-065681. The property was a remnant from the construction of N Columbia Blvd.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Declare property located near the intersection of N Midway Ave and N Columbia Blvd as surplus property and authorize the Bureau of Transportation to dispose of the property for fair market value

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The City, through the Bureau of Transportation, desires to declare the 2,548 sq.ft. property, R151411, as surplus and dispose of the property for fair market value. The property consists of an area quitclaimed from the Oregon State Highway Commission in 1948 via a Quitclaim Deed, Book 1270, Page 76, and a portion of land vacated in 2018 under adopted Ordinance 188038 and recorded as Document #2018-065681. The property was a remnant from the construction of N Columbia Blvd.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The anticipated revenue is not in the FY 24-25 budget; however, the actual one-time revenue would be applied in the fiscal year in which revenue is received. This will be a net benefit as the property would be returned to tax rolls and ongoing maintenance and liability for PBOT would be eliminated.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192086

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The City of Portland owns a 2,548-square-foot property, which consists of land quitclaimed from the Oregon State Highway Commission in 1948 (via a Quitclaim Deed, Book 1270, Page 76), and a portion of land vacated in 2018 under the adopted Ordinance 188038 and recorded as Document #2018-065681, further identified in Multnomah County Assessor’s records as R151411 (the “Property”). The Property was a remnant from the construction of N Columbia Blvd. A legal description and site map of the Property are attached as Exhibits A and B respectively, and by this reference incorporated herein. The Portland Bureau of Transportation (“PBOT”) maintains the vacant site, which has no transportation related use or benefit. Beginning in June 2024, PBOT solicited internal comments from within the bureau and declared it to be excess to its needs. PBOT worked with the City Real Property Coordinator in accordance with Administrative Rule 13.02 and notified other City bureaus of the intent to dispose of the Property. No City bureaus expressed interest or need to control or reserve easements on the Property. The City Real Property Coordinator and PBOT solicited external notification, which included posting signage, listing on City website, notifying neighborhood associations, mailing to surrounding properties, and notifying other government agencies. The Property is now presented to Council to be declared as surplus property for disposition.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Property is declared as surplus, and Council authorizes PBOT to dispose of the Property by sale on the open market.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Jun 23, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send the Ordinance, Document Number 2025-252, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (3): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (2): Novick, Zimmerman)

Final Council action · Aug 6, 202512 yes · 0 no

Final action on 2025-252: Declare property located near the intersection of N Midway Ave and N Columbia Blvd as surplus property and authorize the Bureau of Transportation to dispose of the property for fair market value

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 23, 20253 yes · 2 absent

Motion to send the Ordinance, Document Number 2025-252, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (3): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (2): Novick, Zimmerman)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:12 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:31 AM PDT
Evidence hash
40ca0e737597a6e7
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council