The resolution directs the Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to prepare a comprehensive report detailing the timeline and costs associated with adding 400 new officers to the Portland Police Bureau (PPB). This initiative seeks to align Portland's police staffing levels with national averages of 2.3–2.5 officers per 1,000 residents, addressing current staffing shortages and preparing for projected population growth over the next decade. The report will provide City Council with actionable data to guide recruitment, training, and long-term sustainability planning, ensuring that public safety resources remain adequate and responsive to community needs.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland require Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to provide a report on police officer recruitment goals and costs?
The resolution directs the Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to prepare a comprehensive report detailing the timeline and costs associated with adding 400 new officers to the Portland Police Bureau (PPB). This initiative seeks to align Portland's police staffing levels with national averages of 2.3–2.5 officers per 1,000 residents, addressing current staffing shortages and preparing for projected population growth over the next decade. The report will provide City Council with actionable data to guide recruitment, training, and long-term sustainability planning, ensuring that public safety resources remain adequate and responsive to community needs.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Require Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to provide a report on police officer recruitment goals and costs
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns public safety and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThe community impacts of this resolution are significant. Increased staffing will improve response times, expand patrol coverage, and strengthen community policing, thereby enhancing public safety outcomes. Transparent reporting of costs and timelines will foster accountability and build public confidence in the City's approach to public safety. Recruitment strategies may prioritize outreach to underrepresented communities to ensure that the police force reflects the diversity of Portland's residents. Public involvement will be encouraged through forums and stakeholder meetings that allow residents to provide input on recruitment priorities and deployment strategies. By planning for population growth and urban expansion, the City ensures that public safety resources remain proportional to community needs and national standards, positioning Portland to meet future challenges with foresight and equity.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 7–5
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2026-042: Require Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to provide a report on police officer recruitment goals and costs
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
Not applicable
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
WHEREAS, the Portland Police Bureau and the City of Portland have an obligation to enact evidence-based policies and procedures to address public safety needs, enforce the law, and engage in community-based policing; andWHEREAS, the City of Portland currently has 877 police officer positions, equaling to approximately one officer per 725 residents, and has 65 vacant positions; andWHEREAS, the City of Portland Public Safety Service Area leadership identify metrics including but not limited to response times and the number of investigations as relevant performance metrics directly impacted by staffing levels; andWHEREAS, Public Safety Service Area leadership identify a four-precinct model and the expansion of community partnerships as potential strategies for meeting public safety goals; andWHEREAS, the Portland Police Bureau must maintain staffing levels that adequately meet the public safety standards and best practices of a major US city as well as the context of other public safety systems in and serving Portland (e.g. BOEC, Parking Enforcement, Portland Street Response, and county/regional/state public safety systems); andWHEREAS, a comprehensive assessment of personnel needs, employee Recruitment workload, and associated expenses for the Portland Police Bureau would empower Portland City Council to make evidence-based budgeting decisions; andWHEREAS, there is public interest in considering alternative sources of funding for police, and those considerations must be grounded in fact and sound organizational theory; andNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Portland City Council requests the Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to prepare and submit a report to Portland City Council by June 1, 2026, or earlier, comprising a comprehensive organizational assessment of the Portland Police Bureau:Organizational Chart: The report shall include a proposed organizational structure to positively impact desired outcomes across relevant public safety metrics, identified and endorsed by the Chief of Police, the Deputy City Administrator of the Public Safety Service Area, the City Administrator, and the Mayor. This section should include the progression from current state through proposed end state.Timeline: The report should detail the timeline associated with reaching proposed staffing levels, with an estimate for how much time it might reasonably be expected to take to achieve that goal.Recruitment Costs: shall include a recruitment plan, encompassing advertising costs, recruitment efforts, and personnel overseeing recruitment efforts.Training Costs: These costs will encompass the expenses incurred by the City of Portland related to training facilities, training personnel, and the use of materials and equipment necessary for effective training.Retention: shall include information on retention patterns and proposals for retaining PPB personnel, recognizing that recruitment will increase staffing levels only if it outpaces retirements and other separations.Sustaining Costs: The report shall include an analysis of ongoing costs, such as salaries, COLAs, bonuses, benefits (including estimated increases to annual healthcare costs), retirement costs, uniforms, ongoing training and professional development costs and equipment for the new personnel, as well as estimated changes in personnel overtime expenses. Any miscellaneous costs that were not included above should also be accounted for.Additionally, the Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety should calculate and report a projected cost ratio that reflects the increase in the city's population and urban growth over the next 10 years, as well as changes to other parts of the public safety system which may affect PPB workload (e.g. Council-approved direction for the expansion of Portland Street Response). This will allow Council to project necessary adjustments in both employee workload and budgeting, ensuring that the Portland Police Bureau remains adequately funded and staffed in alignment with the city's growth, Portland's public safety system, nationally recognized best practices, and the core values of the City of Portland.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 6 votes
Recorded amendments
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal.
Motion to divide the amendment to separate out the seventh Whereas clause from the rest of Smith 1: Moved by Kanal. Vote on the seventh Whereas clause of Smith 1: (Aye (2): Dunphy, Smith; Nay (3): Kanal, Novick, Green). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend Smith 1 to restore the seventh Whereas clause with the word “growing” removed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Smith (Aye (3): Dunphy, Novick, Smith; Nay (2): Kanal, Green) Vote on amended Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1, with the removal of the words, “and CHAT” in the sixth Whereas clause: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2026-042, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Read all 7 exact motions
Motion to change the April 30, 2026 date in the Resolution to May 30, 2026: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (4): Smith, Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman; Absent (2): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to change the April 30, 2026 date in the Resolution to June 1, 2026: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Novick. (Aye (7): Avalos, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (5): Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal.
Motion to divide the amendment to separate out the seventh Whereas clause from the rest of Smith 1: Moved by Kanal. Vote on the seventh Whereas clause of Smith 1: (Aye (2): Dunphy, Smith; Nay (3): Kanal, Novick, Green). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend Smith 1 to restore the seventh Whereas clause with the word “growing” removed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Smith (Aye (3): Dunphy, Novick, Smith; Nay (2): Kanal, Green) Vote on amended Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1, with the removal of the words, “and CHAT” in the sixth Whereas clause: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2026-042, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Feb 12, 20266 yes · 4 no · 2 absent
Motion to change the April 30, 2026 date in the Resolution to May 30, 2026: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (4): Smith, Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman; Absent (2): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Feb 12, 20267 yes · 5 no
Motion to change the April 30, 2026 date in the Resolution to June 1, 2026: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Novick. (Aye (7): Avalos, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (5): Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman)
Final Council action · Feb 12, 20267 yes · 5 no
Final action on 2026-042: Require Deputy City Administrator for Public Safety to provide a report on police officer recruitment goals and costs
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jan 29, 20262 yes · 3 no
Motion to divide the amendment to separate out the seventh Whereas clause from the rest of Smith 1: Moved by Kanal. Vote on the seventh Whereas clause of Smith 1: (Aye (2): Dunphy, Smith; Nay (3): Kanal, Novick, Green). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jan 29, 20265 yes
Motion to amend the Resolution as shown in Kanal 1, with the removal of the words, “and CHAT” in the sixth Whereas clause: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jan 29, 20265 yes
Motion to refer the Resolution as amended, Document Number 2026-042, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Smith and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Kanal, Novick, Green, Smith)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:07 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:26 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- 9aed7ac3351b7b24
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Adopted as amended by council
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Adopted as amended
- Council Action
Referred to City Council as amended