The report includes changes to the FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget which must be approved by the City of Portland Budget Committee.
Official proposal and impact statementWhat is Portland deciding about approval of the FY 2025-26 Budget for the City of Portland (Council convenes as Budget Committee)?
The report includes changes to the FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget which must be approved by the City of Portland Budget Committee.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Approval of the FY 2025-26 Budget for the City of Portland (Council convenes as Budget Committee)
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns budget, taxes & finance and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThe Approved Budget as filed includes programmatic changes that will impact the community. These programmatic changes invest resources and reallocate internal resources into bureau programs as articulated in the Mayor’s Proposed Budget document. A three-member Community Budget Advisory Board was invited to sit in on budget discussions with the Mayor and Council as the budget was developed. There were Council work sessions held to discuss the FY 2025-26 Budget process in April and May of 2025. Council conducted four listening sessions in March and April of 2025 as well. Public comment has been solicited on the City Budget Office website, and in accordance with Oregon Local Budget Law, live public testimony was received on May 7th, 2025 during the Mayor's Proposed Budget Hearing and will be heard again on May 21st, 2025. Council members receive weekly emails from the CBO compiling the written comments received by the public through the online portal. The budget process continues with the final opportunity for Council to amend the budget and receive public testimony and input. At present, this is scheduled to occur on June 11, 2025.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Recorded · 12–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Motion to approve a technical adjustment to update Attachment E: Moved by Novick and seconded by Zimmerman. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
The action of the Budget Committee (as requested in this report) reflects a change of $100,650,000 million from the FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget, as distributed on May 5, 2025. The total appropriation including fund transfers is now $8,641,680,199. The reason for this change in expense and resource is because of an interfund loan of $50,000,000 for the Fire Police Disability & Retirement Fund, which receives its levy funding in November of each year, and needs to pay out benefits beginning in July of each fiscal year. The Budget Committee may introduce amendments at the hearing on May 21, 2025. After the Budget Committee votes to approve the budget, the financial information is sent to the Tax Supervising Conversation Commission for their review and subsequent hearing currently scheduled on June 11, 2025.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
TO:Mayor Keith WilsonCouncil President Elana Pirtle-GuineyCouncil Vice President Tiffany Koyama LaneCouncilor Candace AvalosCouncilor Jamie DunphyCouncilor Loretta SmithCouncilor Sameer KanalCouncilor Dan RyanCouncilor Angelita MorilloCouncilor Steve NovickCouncilor Olivia ClarkCouncilor Mitch GreenCouncilor Eric ZimmermanCity Auditor Simone RedeFROM: Ruth Levine, City Budget DirectorDATE: May 13, 2024SUBJECT: Approval of the FY 2025-26 Budget for the City of PortlandWith this memo, the City Budget Office conveys a package of information to aid the Council in considering changes to the Proposed Budget and moving to an Approved Budget for submittal to the Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission (TSCC). Attached to this memo are the following documents:Attachment A: A step-by-step description of the process for consideration of and deliberation on changes to the FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget at the May 21st Budget Committee meetingAttachment B: List of all adjustments to the FY 2025-26 Proposed BudgetAttachment C: Summary of adjustments by fund and major object categoryAttachment D: Budget Notes as Proposed for the ApprovedAttachment E: Tax increment collections planned for the City’s Urban Renewal DistrictsAttachment F: Classifications in Standard Pay GradesAttachment G: Non-represented Classifications in Standard Pay GradesAttachment H: Classifications in Non-Standard Pay GradesAttachment I: Council President Amendment PackageAttachment J: Compiled List of Pre-Filed Council AmendmentsAttachment K: Amendment by GroupingCity Council will present and discuss budget adjustments and budget notes to be incorporated into the Approved Budget on Wednesday, May 21, 2025. The Council will have the opportunity to make further amendments to the budget as part of the Adopted Budget process scheduled for first reading on June 11, 2025.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 8 votes
Recorded amendments
Motion to approve changes to the proposed budget as presented in the memo, in Attachments B and C, to reflect the approved amendments: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to approve the budget as amended: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Zimmerman; Motion withdrawn.
Motion to approve budget as amended: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Novick. (Aye (8): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith)
Read all 9 exact motions
Motion to approve a technical adjustment to update Attachment E: Moved by Novick and seconded by Zimmerman. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to approve the changes to the Proposed Budget as presented in the memo titled, “Approval of the Budget for the City of Portland” and attachments: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to approve Prosper Portland Resolution 7606 including Exhibit A: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to move $999,340 to contingency: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Novick. (Aye (11): Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Kanal)
Motion to approve changes to the proposed budget as presented in the memo, in Attachments B and C, to reflect the approved amendments: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to approve the budget as amended: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Zimmerman; Motion withdrawn.
Motion to approve adjustments in Attachments B, C, and D of the memo: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (9): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (3): Ryan, Zimmerman, Smith)
Motion to approve budget as amended: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Novick. (Aye (8): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith)
Motion to approve the tax levies: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 202512 yes
Motion to approve a technical adjustment to update Attachment E: Moved by Novick and seconded by Zimmerman. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 202512 yes
Motion to approve the changes to the Proposed Budget as presented in the memo titled, “Approval of the Budget for the City of Portland” and attachments: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 202512 yes
Motion to approve Prosper Portland Resolution 7606 including Exhibit A: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 202511 yes · 1 no
Motion to move $999,340 to contingency: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Novick. (Aye (11): Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Kanal)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 202512 yes
Motion to approve changes to the proposed budget as presented in the memo, in Attachments B and C, to reflect the approved amendments: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 20259 yes · 3 no
Motion to approve adjustments in Attachments B, C, and D of the memo: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (9): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (3): Ryan, Zimmerman, Smith)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 20258 yes · 4 no
Motion to approve budget as amended: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Novick. (Aye (8): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Ryan, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 21, 202512 yes
Motion to approve the tax levies: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:14 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 14, 2026, 2:23 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- f164698c0d52546c
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Placed on file as amended by council
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Placed on file