Decisions/2025-026
Ordinance2025-026

Should Portland amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for properties at 3508 NE 11th Ave and 1123 NE Fremont St at the request of Derek Metson, Greenbox…

The request is not for a legislative action, but for approval of a Type III quasi-judicial land use review. The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map designations on the site.Quasi-judicial procedures described in Zoning Code Chapter 33.730, commonly known as land use reviews, are handled by Portland Permitting & Development. Quasi-judicial procedures specifically describe the City Council as the decision-maker for Type III Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and concurrent review requests, per 33.730.030.F.3.a(2).The Hearings Officer has recommended approval of the land use review. Staff will be presenting the Hearings Officer’s recommendation at the hearing.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for properties at 3508 NE 11th Ave and 1123 NE Fremont St at the request of Derek Metson, Greenbox Architecture (LU 24-073674 CP ZC)

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The request is not for a legislative action, but for approval of a Type III quasi-judicial land use review. The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map designations on the site.Quasi-judicial procedures described in Zoning Code Chapter 33.730, commonly known as land use reviews, are handled by Portland Permitting & Development. Quasi-judicial procedures specifically describe the City Council as the decision-maker for Type III Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and concurrent review requests, per 33.730.030.F.3.a(2).The Hearings Officer has recommended approval of the land use review. Staff will be presenting the Hearings Officer’s recommendation at the hearing.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The standard public involvement procedures for a Type III land use review process have been followed. A public hearing with the Hearings Officer was held regarding the proposal. Written testimony in favor of the proposal was received by the Sabin Community Association Land Use & Transportation Committee. At the hearing, a nearby neighbor asked questions about height limits under the new designations. No other testimony was offered at the hearing.The Hearings Officer concluded that, on balance, the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map is found to be equally supportive of the Comprehensive Plan as a whole compared to the current designation, and that the approval criteria for the Zoning Map Amendment were met. The Hearings Officer recommends approval with no conditions.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This is not a legislative action. There are no costs to the City associated with this quasi-judicial land use review. The City resources necessary to review the application are covered by the land use review fees paid by the applicant.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192034

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The Applicant requests a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from R5 – Residential 5,000 to MU-D – Mixed Use - Dispersed, and a Zoning Map Amendment from R5 – Single-Dwelling Residential 5,000 to CM1 – Commercial/Mixed-Use 1, for the following subject property. See Exhibits A (existing zoning) and B (proposed zoning). 3508 NE 11th Ave (1N1E23CD 23900), legally described as “LINCOLN PARK, BLOCK 15, LOT 8 EXC ELY 20’”; and1123 NE Fremont St (1N1E23CD 23800), legally described as “LINCOLN PARK, BLOCK 15, E 20’ OF LOT 8, W 30’ OF LOT 9”. The City received an application complying with all requirements of Title 33, Planning and Zoning, of the Code of the City of Portland seeking Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment Review with the proper fee for filing paid. The Hearings Officer held a duly noticed public hearing on December 18, 2024, and issued a Recommendation on January 13, 2025 (BDS File No. LU 24-073674 CP ZC and Hearings Office 4240018). The Hearings Officer recommended approval of the requested Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment. Based on the findings and conclusions contained in the Recommendation of the Hearings Officer, the City Council finds the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and relevant Title 33 approval criteria.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:City Council adopts the facts, findings, conclusions, and recommendations as amended by Council.City Council approves a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from R5 – Residential 5,000 to MU-D – Mixed Use - Dispersed, and a Zoning Map Amendment from R5 – Single-Dwelling Residential 5,000 to CM1 – Commercial/Mixed-Use 1, for the following properties.3508 NE 11th Ave (1N1E23CD 23900), legally described as “LINCOLN PARK, BLOCK 15, LOT 8 EXC ELY 20’”; and1123 NE Fremont St (1N1E23CD 23800), legally described as “LINCOLN PARK, BLOCK 15, E 20’ OF LOT 8, W 30’ OF LOT 9”.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 2 votes

Recorded amendments

Mar 20, 2025 · Passed

Motion to amend directive A in the ordinance and the attached findings to reflect Council’s tentative vote: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane. Aye (12): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Pirtle-Guiney Passed to second reading as amended April 2, 2025 at 9:45 a.m. time certain

Feb 20, 2025 · Continued

Motion to tentatively approve the application for a comprehensive plan map amendment and zoning map amendment, uphold the recommendation of the Hearings Officer and ask staff to return with revised findings for Council to amend the Ordinance to reflect those revised findings on March 19, 2025 at 6:15 p.m.: Moved by Green and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (11): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Zimmerman) Continued to March 19, 2025 at 6:15 p.m. time certain.

Read all 2 exact motions
Mar 20, 2025 · Amendment · Passed

Motion to amend directive A in the ordinance and the attached findings to reflect Council’s tentative vote: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane. Aye (12): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Pirtle-Guiney Passed to second reading as amended April 2, 2025 at 9:45 a.m. time certain

Feb 20, 2025 · Amendment · Continued

Motion to tentatively approve the application for a comprehensive plan map amendment and zoning map amendment, uphold the recommendation of the Hearings Officer and ask staff to return with revised findings for Council to amend the Ordinance to reflect those revised findings on March 19, 2025 at 6:15 p.m.: Moved by Green and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (11): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Zimmerman) Continued to March 19, 2025 at 6:15 p.m. time certain.

Final Council action · Apr 2, 202512 yes · 0 no

Final action on 2025-026: Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for properties at 3508 NE 11th Ave and 1123 NE Fremont St at the request of Derek Metson, Greenbox Architecture (LU 24-073674 CP ZC)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Feb 20, 202511 yes · 1 absent

Motion to tentatively approve the application for a comprehensive plan map amendment and zoning map amendment, uphold the recommendation of the Hearings Officer and ask staff to return with revised findings for Council to amend the Ordinance to reflect those revised findings on March 19, 2025 at 6:15 p.m.: Moved by Green and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (11): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Zimmerman) Continued to March 19, 202

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:15 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 14, 2026, 2:24 AM PDT
Evidence hash
c26c10a5f38242c0
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  5. Council Action

    Tentatively accept the Hearing Officer’s recommendation of approval; prepare Findings