Decisions/2025-198
Report2025-198

Should Portland reappoint Jill Cropp and Peggy Moretti to the Development Review Advisory Committee for terms to expire March 29, 2028?

Portland City Code Title 3.30.030 specifies that members of the DRAC may serve up to two 3-year terms.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Reappoint Jill Cropp and Peggy Moretti to the Development Review Advisory Committee for terms to expire March 29, 2028

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

This legislation will benefit the development review process and the community by supporting the continued effective functioning of the DRAC. Each of the 17 members of the DRAC represents a unique stakeholder group to the development review process; making the reappointment specified in this legislation will ensure that the member’s stakeholder group will be represented.Public notice regarding this legislation was provided in PP&D’s Plans Examiner newsletter, the PP&D website, and social media platforms. The Plans Examiner is widely distributed electronically to PP&D customers and stakeholders, as well as neighborhood associations and community groups. In addition, current DRAC members notified their stakeholder groups of the vacant position. This legislation appoints citizen volunteer to serve on the DRAC and will have no discernable impact on the City’s energy use. This legislation neither contributes to nor detracts from the City’s goal of meeting 100 percent of community-wide energy needs with renewable energy by 2050.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Accepted

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This legislation reappoints a citizen volunteer to serve on the DRAC, a citizen advisory body, and will have no budgetary or long-term financial impacts for the Bureau of Development Services or the City.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionReport 2025-198

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

As Mayor, I request Council confirmation of the following appointments to the Development Review Advisory Committee, each for a second 3-year term:The Development Review Advisory Committee (DRAC) is a citizen advisory body representing those with interests in the outcome of policies, budgets, regulations, and procedures that affect development review processes. The DRAC is composed of 17 members representing different stakeholder groups, such as builders, developers, designers, and neighborhoods.I recommend two candidates for reappointment.AppointmentMembership Category2nd Full TermJill CroppHome BuildersMarch 30, 2025 through March 29, 2028Peggy Moretti Historic PreservationMarch 30, 2025 through March 29, 2028Jill Cropp is a licensed architect who has worked with developers on commercial and residential housing projects for over 20 years, the last 10 years focused on infill housing for home builders. Jill designs and prepares drawings, applies for land use reviews and building permits for her clients, responds to checksheets, and shepherds applications through the process. Jill’s reappointment to this Committee membership is supported by the Portland Home Builders Association (HBA). Jill occupies the Home Builders member category.Statement from Jill Cropp: I have some specialized skills and experience with complex residential infill projects that has helped PP&D improve permitting and other review processes. This improvement effort is an ongoing project, and I‘d like to continue to contribute to that as long as I’m allowed. Peggy Moretti is the retired Executive Director of Restore Oregon and has a deep understanding of issues around historic preservation. She is now doing some consulting on historic preservation and non-profit management, and is vice chair of the Portland Historic Landmarks Commission. Peggy occupies the Historic Preservation member category.Statement from Peggy Moretti: I enjoy serving as a liaison and connection between the historic preservation field/community and the development community. Reusing existing buildings should be an important component of "development" strategy to achieve the City's housing, sustainability, equity, and livability goals and I would love to see greater collaboration and intersection between reuse / rehabilitation and new construction. The reappointments of Jill Cropp and Peggy Moretti to DRAC will ensure the continuation of their unique perspectives and contributions to Portland’s permitting and development review processes. Jill’s development experience and focus on ongoing improvements, along with Peggy’s commitment to historic preservation and the reuse of existing structures to meet housing goals, play key roles in the committee’s work to improve the city’s development review code, policies, and processes. I recommend that Jill Cropp and Peggy Moretti be appointed to the Development Review Advisory Committee for second terms dated March 30, 2025 through March 29, 2028.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 2 exact motions
Jun 4, 2025 · Main · Recorded

Motion to accept the report: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Morillo.

May 13, 2025 · Main · Recorded

Motion to send Report, Document Number 2025-198 to the full Council with the recommendation it be confirmed: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Ryan, Morillo, Zimmerman, Dunphy, Avalos)

Final Council action · Jun 4, 202511 yes · 0 no · 1 absent

Final action on 2025-198: Reappoint Jill Cropp and Peggy Moretti to the Development Review Advisory Committee for terms to expire March 29, 2028

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 13, 20255 yes

Motion to send Report, Document Number 2025-198 to the full Council with the recommendation it be confirmed: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Ryan, Morillo, Zimmerman, Dunphy, Avalos)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:14 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 14, 2026, 2:22 AM PDT
Evidence hash
0b12946c1cd895eb
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Accepted

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Confirmed

  4. Council Action

    Referred to City Council