Add Bulk Fuel Terminal Capacity Reduction Regulations Code to reduce Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub fuel storage by 2036 in support of hazard mitigation
The purpose of the proposed regulations is to support risk reduction and management in the CEI Hub by requiring bulk fuel terminals to reduce their storage capacity by at least 20 percent by December 1, 2036. The CEI Hub is a six-mile stretch of land in northwest Portland located along the Willamette River. It contains facilities that store and distribute fuels as part of a supply chain critical to Oregon's fuel infrastructure, with more than 90 percent of the state's liquid fuel supply stored at and passing through the CEI Hub via pipeline, barge, or rail. Numerous studies have found that the concentration of bulk fuel terminals in the CEI Hub presents significant…
Community Impacts: The regulations will impact communities located near the CEI Hub and will impact bulk fuel terminals in the CEI Hub. The benefits accrue to both the communities located near and the terminals located in the CEI Hub by reducing the risks associated with a major disaster in the area. The fuel storage reduction percentage specified in these regulations is based on the City's understanding of existing storage capacity across the 11 terminals in the CEI Hub and how fuel demand is projected to change over time. The City engaged Parametrix Consulting to project fuel demand overtime. The modelling found that fuel demand will remain relatively stable in the near-term before declining in the long term. The capacity reduction timeline included in the regulations has been calibrated so that projected fuel demand can continue to be accommodated even under the proposed reduction. In this way, an potential negative impacts of a reduction in fuel storage capacity have been mitigated.Community Involvement: The draft BFT Capacity Reduction Regulations were published in early June 2026, and staff engaged the community as follows:Two online information sessions for the public to learn more and ask questions. One will be scheduled during the workday and the other in the evening.An online Map App with project information, portal to provide written comments, and opportunity to view the written comments of others. A project website provided an overview of the draft BFT Capacity Reduction Regulations and links to extensive background information.A focused informational meeting with community and environmental organizations that had been engaged in the CEI Hub Policy Project community outreach events.Presentations to groups as invited and available.A project email to a list of community and other interested parties. The email provided an additional opportunity to ask questions of staff or provide written comments.Staff expect that City Council will hear testimony from community and neighborhood organizations, industry and industry-related business organizations, individuals who live in proximity to the CEI Hub, environmental organizations, and others.
This project does not amend the budget, change staffing levels, reclassify staff, or authorize new spending or other financial obligations (IGAs, contracts, etc.) and therefore there are no financial or budgetary impacts to the City. The amendments will result in additional workload for BPS staff to process and verify the inventories of bulk fuel terminal storage capacity. Staff estimates that processing and verifying each inventory will cost $10,000. The amendments include establishment of a fee to cover the estimated costs associated with the increased staff work.
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 4: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. (Aye (8): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Morillo, Novick; Nay (4): Avalos, Smith, Koyama Lane, Dunphy)
Official title: Add Bulk Fuel Terminal Capacity Reduction Regulations Code to reduce Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub fuel storage by 2036 in support of hazard mitigation (add Code Chapter 17.112)
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The City has authority to adopt regulations to protect and promote public health.The State of Oregon and the greater Pacific Northwest are vulnerable to powerful subduction zone earthquakes that occur periodically along the Juan de Fuqua and North American plates.In the past, both the Huu-ay-aht First Nation peoples and the Makah tribe shared stories of lost land and peoples as a result of these earthquakes and tsunamis, which scientific research has matched with Japanese tsunami records and on-the-ground geologic field research to reconstruct the Cascadia earthquake of 1700. This research shows that subduction zone earthquakes have occurred along the Pacific Northwest with relative regularity over the last 10,000 years, and if averages from past events are predictive, the region could be overdue for another powerful subduction zone earthquake.Fuels stored in areas subject to natural hazards, such as liquefaction, wildfire and landslides, pose risks to safety, public health, and livability, including mobility of people, freight, and other commercial vehicles.The Critical Energy Infrastructure (CEI) Hub in northwest Portland consists of eleven (11) bulk fuel terminals and the area is subject to multiple natural hazards, including liquefiable soils, wildfire and landslides.The CEI Hub, which consists of Oregon's primary liquid fuel storage and distribution facilities, receives 90 percent of the state's liquid fuel supply either via pipeline or marine vessel. Most of the fuel storage tanks within the CEI Hub were built before seismic design requirements in Oregon's building codes were adopted in 1993.The facilities that comprise the CEI Hub are vulnerable to failure in the event of subduction zone earthquake. A 2012 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Earthquake Risk Study for Oregon's Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub report states that a magnitude 8 or 9 Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake would impact the CEI Hub with: ground shaking; liquefaction; lateral spreading; landslides; and bearing capacity failures. The study also notes that, at the time, only three existing storage tanks were known to have addressed liquefaction vulnerabilities.The Portland Bureau of Emergency Management's Mitigation Action Plan (2021) identifies how natural hazard events like floods, landslides, and earthquakes might affect the City of Portland. The Portland area has experienced numerous earthquakes in the past, ranging from Magnitude 4.5 to 9.0. Portland is expected to experience seismic events in the future.Most of Portland's industrial districts, especially those areas with river access, are located in areas with a high probability of soil liquefaction, as documented by the 2018 DOGAMI Earthquake Regional Impact Analysis, during an earthquake. Fuel storage and associated transloading infrastructure pose considerable risks in the event of a major earthquake as documented by the Portland Bureau of Emergency Management's 2016 Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub Study; the 2012 DOGAMI Earthquake Risk Study for Oregon's Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub report; the 2019 Portland State University Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub Fuel Tank Seismic Assessment, and the 2022 Multnomah County/City of Portland Impacts of a Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake on the CEI Hub.The Portland Bureau of Emergency Management's 2021 Mitigation Action Plan identifies how natural hazard events like floods, landslides, and earthquakes might affect the City of Portland. The Portland area has experienced numerous earthquakes in the past, ranging from Magnitude 4.5 to 9.0. The plan defines mitigation as "actions to reduce potential hazard effects or risk."Tribal communities in Oregon have expressed the importance of protecting the river, a life sustaining and sacred water. They have shared their support for efforts to reduce risks associated with the storage of fuel in natural hazard areas near the river and the related threats to human health, cultural heritage, and environmental quality.Regulating and reducing the quantity of fuel storage capacity in a natural hazard area will mitigate the risk to the surrounding community, industrial district, the Willamette River, and Portland as a whole.The Bulk Fuel Terminals (BFT) Capacity Reduction Regulations mitigate risk by advancing the City's understanding of fuel storage conditions and reducing fuel storage capacity in the CEI Hub. The regulations balance risk reduction from fuel storage in a natural hazard area with the need to allow for the continued supply of Oregon's fuel. These regulations in conjunctions with other city and state regulatory requirements can help reduce risk from the terminals and support increased safety and resilience for the community and environment.The BFT Capacity Reduction Regulations feature:Inventory requirements to establish existing storage capacity, and understand material storage conditions and trends in usage and needs;Storage tank capacity reductions by December 1, 2036;Inventory verification processes, including public notification and opportunity for comment;Process and fines for violations;Establishment of a CEI Hub Mitigation Improvement Sub-Fund for receipt of any violation penalties for use toward impact mitigation investments; andEstablishment of administrative fees to cover staff costs of implementation. Administrative fees are required for the processing and verification of the required inventories and for a possible appeal of an inventory's verification. The fees are based on an estimate of the number of staff hours required to complete the work and the billing rates of the staff assigned to complete the work.On June 3, 2026, a draft version of the Title 17 BFT Capacity Reduction Regulations report was released for public review and public comments were accepted through June 30, 2026. BPS received over fifty (50) written public comments submitted through the Map App.On August 17, 2026, the Bulk Fuel Terminal Capacity Reduction Regulations, Amendments to City Code Title 17, dated August 2026, was released for public review.On September 16, 2026, the Finance and Governance Committee of the Whole held a hearing on the Bulk Fuel Terminal Capacity Reduction Regulations, Amendments to City Code Title 17, dated August 2026, and invited public testimony.The City Council held a hearing on the Bulk Fuel Terminal Capacity Reduction Regulations, Amendments to City Code Title 17, dated August 2026, on October 21, 2026, and invited public testimony.The City Council finds that large bulk fuel terminals at the CEI Hub represent a risk to people, property and the natural environment that the City Council finds as a compelling reason to limit future risk by requiring documentation of fuel storage tank status, materials stored, and fill levels to have as complete a picture as possible of BFT operations and reducing the future fuel storage tank capacity at existing terminals. Reducing fuel storage capacity at BFTs in a moderate- to high-risk area will mitigate the risk to the community, environment and economy.The Council recognizes that there is a need for an actual reduction in demand for liquid fuel. Therefore, it is incumbent on the City to do what it can to reduce demand. Accordingly, Council expresses our commitment to work with the PCEF committee and other stakeholders to ensure that in the next Climate Investment Plan we bring our investments in transportation more in line with the 40% of emissions coming from the transportation sector, and increase the percent of Portland Clean Energy Fund dollars spent on transportation measures to promote transit, biking, walking, transition to electric cars, and the reduction of diesel emissions.Bulk Fuel Terminal Capacity Reduction Regulations, Amendments to City Code Title 17, dated August 2026, are not intended to implement the Comprehensive Plan, apply regardless of whether there is a pending land use application, and are consistent with the City's interest and authority in protecting public health and safety.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Add City Code Chapter 17.112 as shown in Exhibit A.The City Administrator is authorized to implement procedures and administrative rules as necessary to implement these regulations.The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability will provide a report to City Council in 2028, 2031, and 2036 on the status of Oregon DEQ Risk Mitigation Implementation Plans (RMIPs), updated fuel demand projections and the capacity reduction program.The City Administrator shall present a report to Council no later than September 30, 2027, outlining the City's public health and natural hazards risk reduction plan for the CEI Hub. The City Administrator will present an interim update to Council on progress toward this deadline no later than March 31, 2027.This report must include, at a minimum, prevention, mitigation, and response measures from the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland Permitting and Development, Portland Bureau of Emergency Management, and Portland Fire and Rescue, such as:Evacuation plans from Linnton and other affected areas of Northwest Portland;Evacuation plans from North Portland west of the railroad cut, including at a minimum plans for seismically resilient bridges across the railroad cut;A proposal for Industrial Firefighting Capacity that can access the broader CEI Hub / Linnton area without the use of infrastructure which is likely to be unusable in the case of a major natural disaster (e.g. bridges across the Willamette River);A proposal for Fire & Rescue capacity for North Portland west of the railroad cut that can access the area without the use of infrastructure likely to be unusable in the case of a major natural disaster (e.g. sufficient capacity for the area at Fire Station 22);A proposal for emergency supplies and resources (e.g. BEECN, NETs) needed for all areas that may be affected by various disaster scenarios involving the CEI Hub. City Council recognizes that the risk posed by the CEI Hub to Portland communities will not be fully mitigated by this proposal by 2036. Council commits to continued engagement with CEI Hub terminal operators, the Oregon Department of Energy, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, and community stakeholders, and directs that the status of this continued engagement be included in each of the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability's annual reports to Council, alongside updates on RMIP status and fuel demand projections. Council further commits to continue working to reduce the total fuel stored at the CEI Hub and reduce risk to Portland over the coming decades, beyond the requirements established by this ordinance. Council will continue stakeholder engagement after 2036. The City Administrator shall submit to Council an initial draft available for public comment no later than June 30, 2027 and an updated draft to City Council by September 1, 2027, recommendations for replacement approaches to the fuel reduction program based on the data that the bulk fuel terminals report to the City by March 31, 2027. Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, diagram, designation, or drawing contained in this Ordinance, or the plan, map or code it adopts or amends, is held to be deficient, invalid or unconstitutional, that shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The Council declares that it would have adopted the plan, map, or code and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, diagram, designation, and drawing thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, diagrams, designations, or drawings contained in this Ordinance, may be found to be deficient, invalid or unconstitutional.
Meeting history3 meetings · 2 votes
Continued as amendedAgenda item 5
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. Motion withdrawn.
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 4: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. (Aye (8): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Morillo, Novick; Nay (4): Avalos, Smith, Koyama Lane, Dunphy)
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. Motion withdrawn.
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Dunphy; Nay (2): Smith, Ryan)
Continued as amended to November 5, 2026 at 2:00 pm time certain
Continued as amendedAgenda item 10
Motion to amend the ordinance and Exhibit A as shown in Green/Pirtle-Guiney/Kanal/Clark/Koyama Lane 2: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane.
Councilor Clark requested to divide the question to vote on Amendment 2 separately from Amendments 1, 3, 4, and 5.
Vote called on Amendment 2-Remove Aviation Fuel Exemption: (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.
Vote called on Amendments 1-Directive for alternative approaches, 3-Inventory and Reporting Requirements, 4-Penalties, and 5-Continued engagement: (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Dunphy; Nay (2): Zimmerman, Ryan)
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. Vote not called.
Item continued as amended to October 7, 2026 at 10:00 am time certain.
ContinuedAgenda item 13
Oral record is closed.
Written record will close October 1, 2026 at 12:00 pm.
Continued to October 1, 2026 at 2:00 pm time certain.
Read all 6 exact motions
Oct 7, 2026 · Amendment · Withdrawn
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. Motion withdrawn.
Oct 7, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 4: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. (Aye (8): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Morillo, Novick; Nay (4): Avalos, Smith, Koyama Lane, Dunphy)
Oct 7, 2026 · Amendment · Withdrawn
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. Motion withdrawn.
Oct 7, 2026 · Amendment · Continued
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Dunphy; Nay (2): Smith, Ryan) Continued as amended to November 5, 2026 at 2:00 pm time certain
Oct 1, 2026 · Amendment · Failed
Motion to amend the ordinance and Exhibit A as shown in Green/Pirtle-Guiney/Kanal/Clark/Koyama Lane 2: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane. Councilor Clark requested to divide the question to vote on Amendment 2 separately from Amendments 1, 3, 4, and 5. Vote called on Amendment 2-Remove Aviation Fuel Exemption: (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass. Vote called on Amendments 1-Directive for alternative approaches, 3-Inventory and Reporting Requirements, 4-Penalties, and 5-Continued engagement: (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Dunphy; Nay (2): Zimmerman, Ryan)
Oct 1, 2026 · Amendment · Continued
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Clark. Vote not called. Item continued as amended to October 7, 2026 at 10:00 am time certain.
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Clark. (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Dunphy; Nay (2): Smith, Ryan) Continued as amended to November 5, 2026 at 2:00 pm time certain
0 human-reviewed findings are linked to this record. Unreviewed machine-extracted fragments are not presented as findings.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats · Rules v2
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
Decision definition
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Complete
Official legal text
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
Complete
Financial impact
The official impact statement includes financial information.
Complete
Funding source
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
Complete
Supporting documents
29 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.
Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity
The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.
Unknown
Counterparty acceptance
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
Not Applicable
Implementation
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Complete
Document stability
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 31, 2026, 10:39 PM PDT
Last checked
Oct 15, 2026, 5:07 PM PDT
Evidence hash
70a6c4a690dc230e
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
SOURCE UPDATED
Continued as amended on October 7, 2026 by City Council
SOURCE UPDATED
Passed to second reading as amended on October 7, 2026 by City Council
Council Action
Passed to second reading as amended
Council Action
Continued as amended
SOURCE UPDATED
Continued as amended on October 1, 2026 by City Council
Council Action
Continued as amended
SOURCE UPDATED
Continued on September 24, 2026 by City Council
Council Action
Continued
SOURCE UPDATED
Observed in the official source.
SOURCE UPDATED
Referred to Finance and Governance Committee of the Whole by Council President
DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Referred to Finance and Governance Committee of the Whole by Council President
Independent guide by Portland Civic Lab. Official City records are authoritative. Votes alone do not establish a Councilor’s reasons.