If full Council approves the ordinance and the sale closes, the City’s pipeline franchise would transfer from Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings to ISQ Springer Holdings.
Proposed ordinance, Section 1 and Council directionShould Portland allow Zenith’s pipeline franchise to transfer to a new owner?
Zenith is selling its Portland facilities to ISQ Springer. Because the company operates a petroleum-products pipeline under City streets through a City franchise, Council must consent before that franchise can transfer. The proposed ordinance would place the existing franchise obligations on the new owner.
Official ordinance and impact statementSee the official legal title
Consent to franchise transfer from Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings LLC to ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC (amend Ordinance 188554)
Should Portland approve the franchise transfer now, and what oversight can Council legally attach?
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The existing franchise terms, duties, insurance and bond requirements, and franchise fees would remain in place; ISQ would assume them after closing.
Official impact statement and proposed ordinanceCity consent is legally required because the franchise authorizes a private pipeline in limited portions of public streets. The decision concerns who assumes responsibility for complying with that franchise.
Proposed ordinance findingsThe proposal directly affects Zenith, ISQ, the City’s franchise oversight, retained facility employees, and residents who follow Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub activities.
Official findings and community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 7–6
Read the exact motion or vote question
Vote register entry for 2026-263: Consent to franchise transfer from Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings LLC to ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC (amend Ordinance 188554)
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
City staff reported no new financial impact to the City and said ISQ would pay the same franchise fees Zenith pays today.
Official financial impact statement- When will full Council schedule its decision?
- What reasons did individual members give for the 7–5 split? A human transcript review has not yet been published.
- Will full Council add conditions or amend the proposed transfer before acting?
Because final Council action has not occurred, residents can monitor the official agenda and use the testimony instructions attached to a future scheduled item. The current record does not yet list that hearing date.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents13 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govShow 7 more documents
Read the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:On August 16, 2017, Council approved Ordinance No. 188554 granting a franchise to LCP Oregon Holdings, LLC (LCPOH) for its pipeline system to transport petroleum and/or petroleum products within a limited portion of City streets.On September 5, 2018, Council approved Ordinance No. 189149 amending that franchise to clarify that LCPOH's pipeline system can be used to transport renewable fuels and to allow the transportation of liquid intermediates.On November 21, 2018, Council approved Ordinance No. 189255 transferring the franchise agreement held by LCPOH to Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings LLC (Zenith), which had operated LCPOH's pipeline system on its behalf since 2014.On January 7, 2026, the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) received a letter indicating that Zenith had agreed to sell its Portland terminal to ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC (ISQ), along with a request from Zenith for consent to transfer Zenith's franchise agreement granted via Ordinance No. 188554, as amended by Ordinance No. 189149 and transferred to Zenith by Ordinance No. 189255, to ISQ.ISQ and Zenith are requesting that the Council consent to the transfer of the franchise agreement from Zenith to ISQ, so that the sale acquisition can close.City Charter Section 10-216 and the franchise agreement require the prior written consent of the City expressed by ordinance to transfer the franchise.The franchise agreement allows the City to inquire into the technical, legal, and financial qualifications of a prospective transferee to accept the transfer.As part of its due diligence review of the requested transfer, staff from the Franchise Utility Program (FUP) within BPS requested and collected information from ISQ that documented ISQ's technical, legal, and financial ability to safely run and operate the facility.ISQ submitted a memorandum to the City outlining its technical, legal, and financial qualifications in support of its request for the franchise transfer, and City staff in the FUP requested additional information regarding ISQ's operations of the facility and information regarding relevant regulatory compliance violations of ISQ and specified affiliates.FUP staff reviewed submitted materials from ISQ before forming their staff recommendation and found the submitted materials demonstrate that ISQ has the technical, legal, and financial expertise and knowledge to safely run and operate the facility. ISQ intends to retain all facility employees that are currently employed by Zenith to maintain technical expertise at the facility post-sale.As a holding company, ISQ owns and operates other energy companies and operates other facilities similar to the Zenith facility. As a result, ISQ has broad experience demonstrating its ability to navigate the legal and regulatory requirements required to safely run the facility and comply with all local, state, and federal laws.Based on its review, staff recommends that Council consent to the transfer of Ordinance No. 188554, as amended by Ordinance No. 189149, and as transferred to Zenith by Ordinance No. 189255, to ISQ.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Pursuant to Portland City Charter Section 10-216 and Section 8 of Ordinance No. 188554, consent is hereby given to the transfer of the franchise for Zenith Energy Terminal Holdings LLC's pipeline system under the City streets to ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC.Effective upon the closing of such an acquisition, ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC will be responsible for performing, complying with, and assuming all of the covenants, duties, obligations and liabilities under Ordinance No. 188554, as amended by Ordinance No. 189149, including the provision of insurance and bonds required under the franchise. Within 30 days after the closing of such an acquisition, ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC shall provide certificates of insurance and bonds, naming ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC and the City as required under Ordinance No. 188554, as amended by Ordinance No. 189149.Within 30 days after the closing of such an acquisition, ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC shall file in the Office of the Auditor of the City of Portland a written acceptance of this ordinance meeting the approval of the City Attorney. Such acceptance shall be unqualified and shall be construed to be an acceptance of all the terms, conditions and restrictions contained in this ordinance and Ordinance No. 188554, as amended by Ordinance No. 189149. A failure on the part of ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC to file such written acceptance within such time shall be deemed a rejection and abandonment, and this ordinance shall thereupon be null and void.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes7 meetings · 8 votes
Recorded amendments
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green-Morillo 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading September 16, 2026 at 6:00 pm
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green-Morillo 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Morillo. Vote not called. Continued to September 3, 2026 at 2:00 pm
Read all 10 exact motions
Motion to call the question on the vote to reconsider Item 2026-186: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. (Aye (10): Koyama Lane, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy; Nay (2): Morillo, Kanal)
Motion to reconsider Item 2026-263: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy; Nay (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal)
Motion to call the question on Item 2026-263: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. (Aye (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy; Nay (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal) Vote called on Item 2026-263: Aye (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan; Nay (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy. Mayor Wilson cast the deciding vote per Charter Section 2-401.
Motion to reconsider Item 2026-263: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. Motion withdrawn. Councilors Clark and Ryan joined Councilor Smith to appeal the Council President's ruling on the point of order that an absent member at the time of the vote is not on the prevailing side for purpose of moving for reconsideration. Vote called on whether the ruling of the Council President should be sustained: (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). The ruling of the Council President is sustained.
Motion to reconsider Item 2026-263: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. Vote not called.
Motion to postpone the pending vote to reconsider Item 2026-263 until next week: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (8): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Dunphy; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Motion to reconsider item 2026-263 is pending.
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green-Morillo 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading September 16, 2026 at 6:00 pm
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green-Morillo 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Morillo. Vote not called. Continued to September 3, 2026 at 2:00 pm
Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document 2026-263, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Novick. (Aye (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan; Nay (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 23, 202610 yes · 2 no
Motion to call the question on the vote to reconsider Item 2026-186: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. (Aye (10): Koyama Lane, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy; Nay (2): Morillo, Kanal)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 23, 20267 yes · 5 no
Motion to reconsider Item 2026-263: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy; Nay (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal)
Final Council action · Sep 23, 20267 yes · 6 no
Vote register entry for 2026-263: Consent to franchise transfer from Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings LLC to ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC (amend Ordinance 188554)
Final Council action · Sep 23, 20265 yes · 6 no · 1 absent
Vote register entry for 2026-263: Consent to franchise transfer from Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings LLC to ISQ Springer Holdings, LLC (amend Ordinance 188554)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 17, 20266 yes · 6 no
Motion to reconsider Item 2026-263: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. Motion withdrawn. Councilors Clark and Ryan joined Councilor Smith to appeal the Council President's ruling on the point of order that an absent member at the time of the vote is not on the prevailing side for purpose of moving for reconsideration. Vote called on whether the ruling of the Council President should be sustained: (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman,
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 17, 20268 yes · 4 no
Motion to postpone the pending vote to reconsider Item 2026-263 until next week: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (8): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Dunphy; Nay (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 9, 20266 yes · 6 no
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green-Morillo 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading September 16, 2026 at 6:00 pm
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20267 yes · 5 no
Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document 2026-263, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Novick. (Aye (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan; Nay (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
12 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Sep 24, 2026, 12:07 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 28, 2026, 1:07 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- eaa63d6f5c24b8eb
- Guide status
- Source-reviewed synthesis
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed
- Council Action
Passed
- SOURCE UPDATED
Failed to pass on September 16, 2026 by City Council
- Council Action
Failed to pass
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed to second reading on September 9, 2026 by City Council
- Council Action
Passed to second reading
- SOURCE UPDATED
Continued on September 3, 2026 by City Council
- Council Action
Continued
- SOURCE UPDATED
Continued on September 2, 2026 by City Council
- Council Action
Continued
- SOURCE UPDATED
Referred to City Council on August 6, 2026 by Finance and Governance Committee of the Whole
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Referred to City Council on August 6, 2026 by Finance and Governance Committee of the Whole