Decisions/2025-483
Ordinance2025-483

What is Portland deciding about annex the 5048 SW Hilltop Lane property?

The property owner at 5048 SW Hilltop Lane has submitted a petition to annex their property into the city for the purpose of connecting to City sewer. The owner recently filed permits with Portland Permitting & Development (PP&D) the with the intent to construct a single-family residence on the site. Upon contacting the City of Portland to inquire about utility connections, the owner was informed by BPS staff that the property must be annexed into the City to receive urban services, per City of Portland Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.11. The property owner submitted a sewer connection permit application to PP&D prior to being notified of the annexation requirement. The City of Portland is allowing the building permitting process to continue concurrent with the City annexation petition. Upon annexation, the property will retain its R20 and the "z" natural resources overlay zones.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Annex the 5048 SW Hilltop Lane property

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The property owner at 5048 SW Hilltop Lane has submitted a petition to annex their property into the city for the purpose of connecting to City sewer. The owner recently filed permits with Portland Permitting & Development (PP&D) the with the intent to construct a single-family residence on the site. Upon contacting the City of Portland to inquire about utility connections, the owner was informed by BPS staff that the property must be annexed into the City to receive urban services, per City of Portland Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.11. The property owner submitted a sewer connection permit application to PP&D prior to being notified of the annexation requirement. The City of Portland is allowing the building permitting process to continue concurrent with the City annexation petition. Upon annexation, the property will retain its R20 and the "z" natural resources overlay zones.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

This annexation request has followed procedural requirements for an "expedited process for minor boundary changes" (BCP-ENB-1 .02) and METRO Code Section 3.09.045. Interested service providing agencies and governmental agencies have received notice of the proposed annexation as have private property owners within 100 feet of the proposed annexation. Limited inquiry has been returned in response to public notice, and no formal objection has been received.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

Financial implication will be minimal. No connections to City services have been made at this time. Additional permitting for utility connections will be required once annexation is complete. The annexation will be reflected on Portland tax rolls upon annexation.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192136

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The property owners and registered voters have initiated a proposal by a consent petition to annex to the City of Portland the property described in Exhibit A, and generally illustrated with Exhibit B. The property owners are requesting connection to City sewer and water service to a site within the City's Urban Services Boundary. As a condition of these connections, the applicant must request annexation to the City.The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability prepared a staff report meeting the requirements of City administrative rule and Metro code on December 4, 2025, more than seven days before the first reading of this ordinance.Based on the December 4, 2025, Staff Report attached as Exhibit C, which Council adopts in whole as its own findings, this proposal for annexation meets the applicable approval criteria.By operation of Charter Section 3-109, the subject property is most contiguous to Council District 4 and becomes part of that district upon annexation.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:A. The proposed annexation described in Exhibit A is approved.B. The subject property will be withdrawn from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District #1 JT.C. The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability will provide the City Auditor a current list of the names and addresses of public utilities, electric cooperatives, and telecommunications carriers in the City. The City Auditor is authorized and directed to file certified copies of this Ordinance with the Boundary Change Office of Metro and entities in the list provided by the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Dec 11, 2025 · Main · Recorded

Motion to send Ordinance, Document Number 2025-483, to the full Council with no recommendation: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (3): Avalos, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (2): Ryan, Novick)

Final Council action · Jan 21, 202611 yes · 0 no · 1 absent

Final action on 2025-483: Annex the 5048 SW Hilltop Lane property

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 11, 20253 yes · 2 no

Motion to send Ordinance, Document Number 2025-483, to the full Council with no recommendation: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (3): Avalos, Kanal, Morillo; Nay (2): Ryan, Novick)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:07 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:26 AM PDT
Evidence hash
78297a2bc9c6ff48
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council