The Over-expenditure Ordinance is primarily intended to allow bureaus to make technical adjustments and other revisions to their current year budget. However, bureaus are also permitted to request General Fund Unrestricted Contingency resources to address exigent needs preventing over-expenditure in bureau funds.
Official proposal and impact statementOrdinance2026-199
Should Portland adopt the Supplemental Budget for the FY 2025-26 over-expenditure process and make budget adjustments in various funds?
The Over-expenditure Ordinance is primarily intended to allow bureaus to make technical adjustments and other revisions to their current year budget. However, bureaus are also permitted to request General Fund Unrestricted Contingency resources to address exigent needs preventing over-expenditure in bureau funds.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Adopt the Supplemental Budget for the FY 2025-26 over-expenditure process and make budget adjustments in various funds
Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matterWhat this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns budget, taxes & finance and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThe Over-Expenditure Ordinance happens late in the fiscal year and, in a short timeframe, addresses mostly technical issues. There is little to no time for community involvement other than the public hearing. Community impacts in the ordinance are minimal as they reflect changes to budgets to match anticipated actual spending in order to avoid overspending any given appropriation category.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Final Council action
Passed · 12–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2026-199: Adopt the Supplemental Budget for the FY 2025-26 over-expenditure process and make budget adjustments in various funds
Rationale review not yet published
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
Approval of the exhibits to this ordinance reflect several individual budget changes in 29 funds, with a net total appropriation increase of $31,751,811 All changes are summarized in Exhibit 1.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents12 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192198
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govShow 6 more documents
Read the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:Exhibit 1, attached, includes all incremental changes to the City appropriation schedule as a result of the "Over-Expenditure Ordinance" Supplemental Budget Process. A memorandum, attached as Exhibit 2 identifies programs, projects, or activities that require appropriation adjustment or transfer of appropriation within bureau and fund budgets. Exhibit 3, attached, shows, for informational purposes, a reconciliation of changes to all funds. Exhibit 4, attached, shows, for informational purposes, all requests materially affecting the General Fund. Exhibit 5, attached, shows all position changes. There are no position changes in this ordinance. Exhibit 6, attached, shows, for informational purposes, a Decision Package report detailing all line item changes included in this ordinance.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The FY 2025-26 Appropriation Schedule is hereby amended by adjusting appropriations for certain expenditures in various funds as indicated by the increases and decreases presented in Exhibit 1; explanation of these changes is provided in the memorandum attached as Exhibit 2.The actions amending the FY 2025-26 Revised Budget contained in this ordinance are binding City policy.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 2 votes
Passed as amendedAgenda item 10
Passed to second reading as amendedAgenda item 17
ContinuedAgenda item 11
Recorded amendments
Motion to amend Document 2026-199 as shown in the Technical Amendment: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (12): Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended June 17, 2026 at 6:15 pm time certain
Read all 1 exact motions
Motion to amend Document 2026-199 as shown in the Technical Amendment: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (12): Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended June 17, 2026 at 6:15 pm time certain
Final Council action · Jun 17, 202612 yes · 0 no
Final action on 2026-199: Adopt the Supplemental Budget for the FY 2025-26 over-expenditure process and make budget adjustments in various funds
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 11, 202612 yes
Motion to amend Document 2026-199 as shown in the Technical Amendment: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (12): Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended June 17, 2026 at 6:15 pm time certain
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
Decision definition
CompleteThe official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official legal text
CompleteOfficial text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
Financial impact
CompleteThe official impact statement includes financial information.
Funding source
CompleteThe impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
Supporting documents
Complete11 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.
Referenced exhibit integrity
UnknownThe text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.
Counterparty acceptance
Not ApplicableThe reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
Implementation
CompleteA direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Document stability
UnknownStability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:04 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:23 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- f4e839cc022445c8
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed as amended by council
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Passed as amended
- Council Action
Passed to second reading as amended
- Council Action
Continued