Decisions/2026-097
Ordinance2026-097

Should Portland vacate NE Couch St and NE Davis St west of NE 97th Ave subject to certain conditions and reservations (VAC-10140)?

The purpose of this legislation is to vacate NE Couch St and NE Davis St west of NE 97th Ave (the "Street Area"), as recommended in the City Administrator Report. On October 28, 2024, PBOT RPS staff received a request for the vacation of the Street Area, with a petition from its Bureau of Transportation ("PBOT" and the "Petitioner"). The Street Area is currently unimproved, is not developed to City standards, and consists of two dead-end street segments that only connect to NE 97th Avenue due to access restrictions put in place by the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation. This street vacation was initiated by PBOT in support of the NE 97th Avenue Phase II Local Improvement District ("LID") and the NE Couch/Davis LID projects authorized by Ordinance No. 189472. The Ordinance complies with state law under ORS 271 and City Code, Chapter 17.84.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Vacate NE Couch St and NE Davis St west of NE 97th Ave subject to certain conditions and reservations (VAC-10140)

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The purpose of this legislation is to vacate NE Couch St and NE Davis St west of NE 97th Ave (the "Street Area"), as recommended in the City Administrator Report. On October 28, 2024, PBOT RPS staff received a request for the vacation of the Street Area, with a petition from its Bureau of Transportation ("PBOT" and the "Petitioner"). The Street Area is currently unimproved, is not developed to City standards, and consists of two dead-end street segments that only connect to NE 97th Avenue due to access restrictions put in place by the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation. This street vacation was initiated by PBOT in support of the NE 97th Avenue Phase II Local Improvement District ("LID") and the NE Couch/Davis LID projects authorized by Ordinance No. 189472. The Ordinance complies with state law under ORS 271 and City Code, Chapter 17.84.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

Vacation proceedings have been City initiated without a petition or consent of property owners in accordance with ORS 271.130 (Vacation on Council's own motion) and notice to surrounding property owners shall be given as provided by ORS 271.110 (Notice of hearing). As an additional requirement of the state statute, notice of the public hearing has been published in the Daily Journal of Commerce and public notice signs have been physically posted near the Street Area. City Bureaus, government agencies, public utilities and affected neighborhood and business associations provided comments for the Street Area. PBOT did not receive any objections to the vacation request. The Planning Commission ("PC") advertised and then held a public hearing on April 8, 2025. No one from the public came forward to testify in support or opposition of the vacation, and the PC ultimately recommended approval of the vacation request to Council. There do not appear to be any other impacts to the community from vacating the Street Area. No opposition to this street vacation request is expected and no one has expressed their desire to testify at the hearing. There is no future public involvement anticipated since the Ordinance will conclude the street vacation process.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The process for vacating streets is a cost recovery program, typically paid for by the Petitioner. The cost of processing this street vacation has been included as a part of two LID projects overseen by PBOT. Expenses for processing a street vacation request typically range between $11,000 and $20,000+, depending on the complexity. This street vacation falls in the middle of the range and is estimated (with moderate confidence) to be approximately $15,000. Fees paid by the Petitioner for this street vacation will cover the actual expenditures incurred by City staff for the processing of this request. The SAP Cost Object is T00903.C46. These expenses are occurring in FY 24-25, and 25-26. This legislation does not affect staffing levels, nor will it result in a new or modified financial obligation or benefit now or in the future. If City Council does not approve the Ordinance, the Street Area will remain as public right-of-way. The City will continue to have maintenance obligations for the Street Area and the land will not be returned to the City tax rolls. Future transit-oriented development on the abutting parcels will be limited to those land areas that are already under private control.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192161

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:In accordance with ORS 271.130 (Vacation on council's own motion, the City of Portland ("City") through its Bureau of Transportation ("PBOT" or "Petitioner"), the controlling bureau of adjoining property, initiated the vacation of portions of NE Couch Street and NE Davis Street as described on Exhibit 1 and depicted on Exhibit 2 (the "Street Area"). The Street Area was originally acquired as public right-of-way in the duly recorded plat of "Russellville Addition to East Portland". The Street Area is currently unpaved and is not improved to current City standards. Motor vehicle operators, bicyclists, and pedestrians currently lack access from the Street Area to any public rights-of-way other than NE 97th Avenue. This is due to access restrictions put in place by the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation for operation and maintenance of the I-205 Freeway, the I-205 Multiuse Path, and the MAX light rail system located immediately to the west. The reason for the City initiated vacation is to consolidate property to facilitate the construction of public improvements through the NE 97th Avenue Phase II Local Improvement District ("LID") and the NE Couch/Davis LID projects authorized by Ordinance No. 189472, and to facilitate future transit-oriented development in the Gateway Regional Center. Upon completion of the street vacation process, the Street Area will revert back to Joe M. Westerman as the owner (the "Owner") of the abutting private property parcels. The vacation is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with recommendations made by the City Administrator and the Planning Commission, as provided in the City Administrator's Report, dated May 13, 2025, and on file with the Auditor and PBOT. In accordance with ORS 271.100, the Portland City Council (the "Council") fixed a time and place for public hearing before the Council; notice was published in the Daily Journal of Commerce and posted at the site in the areas proposed for vacation. Other procedural requirements of ORS 271 have been complied with, and the Council having held a public hearing, finds no objections were made or filed hereto, and it is in the public interest to vacate the Street Area.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Street Area, more particularly described as follows, is hereby vacated:As described on Exhibit 1 and depicted on Exhibit 2 attached and incorporated by reference. Containing 7,450 total square feet, more or lessThe vacation of the Street Area is granted subject to the following conditions:City staff with the Bureau of Permitting & Development, STARS & Records Conversion have responded that the City is currently unable to remove the assigned address for the parcel of property identified as 9648 NE Couch Street. This is because a demolition permit has not been issued for the existing house at this location. The address can only be removed from the property at such time that a demolition permit has been applied. If there is no demolition of the existing house, the Owner will need to contact ppdaddressing@portlandoregon.gov and complete the readdressing process so that the parcel is addressed off of NE 97th Avenue. These tasks must be completed prior to the recording of this Ordinance.City staff with the Bureau of Technology Services, GIS & Web Services have required that the properties currently addressed as 9652 NE Davis Street and as 9648 NE Couch Street must be readdressed. The Owner will need to contact ppdaddressing@portlandoregon.gov and complete the readdressing process so that both parcels are addressed off of NE 97th Avenue.In accordance with ORS 271.120 and City policy, the street vacation ordinance (this "Ordinance"), shall not cause or require the removal or abandonment of any sewer, water or gas main, conduit of any kind, wire, pole or thing used, or intended to be used, for any public service, including, but not limited to those identified by Pacific Power. Subject to Paragraph b.5. below, this Ordinance will reserve an easement for the owner of any such utility or thing to maintain, continue, repair, reconstruct, renew, replace, rebuild, and/or enlarge any and all such thing; that no building or structure of any kind shall be built or erected within a distance of ten (10) feet from the centerline of any such utility, except with the prior written consent of the City Administrator and the owner of the utility and that any and all contemplated building plans in said vacated area shall be submitted for approval to the City Administrator and to the Director of the Bureau of Permitting & Development, to the end that such construction may be so adjusted with reference to all public utilities in said areas as to cause a minimum of danger or inconvenience to the public and to the owner of such utility and to protect and preserve the same as presently constructed or hereinafter reconstructed, renewed, replaced and/or enlarged. Removal or relocation of existing utilities in the Street Area will require written agreements between the property owner(s) and owner(s) of the utilities.Notwithstanding Condition b.3., this Ordinance will serve as a full release of City interests in the Street Area and will provide City Bureaus with the authority necessary to take all other legal actions as may be reasonably necessary (including the issuance of quitclaim deeds acknowledging the release of any interests) to achieve this intent.If any property, encumbered by an easement reserved in this Ordinance, is ever rededicated as public right-of-way, that portion of the easement located in the rededicated right-of-way shall automatically be terminated.City costs associated with processing the street vacation petition shall be paid in full before the City records this Ordinance.In the event the Petitioner fails to fully comply with the above conditions within six months of Council adopting this Ordinance, Council may repeal this Ordinance at its sole discretion.Section 2. The Owner shall file with the Auditor, in form approved by the City Attorney, a document in writing, accepting the terms and conditions of the Ordinance.Section 3. Notice is given that the street vacation will not be effective until a certified copy of the Ordinance has been recorded by the City in Multnomah County Deed Records. Prerequisites to recording this Ordinance are that 30 days have passed after final Council passage of this Ordinance, that all conditions of this Ordinance have been met, and that all vacation costs have been paid.Section 4. After the prerequisites to recording this Ordinance have been met, the Auditor shall return a certified copy of this Ordinance and the acceptance thereof, to RPS staff, which shall, at the expense of the Petitioner, file with the recorder, the assessor, and the surveyor of the county in which said property is located, the certified copy of this Ordinance and the acceptance, and any map, plat or other record which may be required by law. RPS staff shall return a copy of the recorded ordinance to the Auditor and retain the original recorded ordinance in RWA File No. 9600.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Mar 9, 2026 · Main · Passed

Motion to send the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-097, to the full Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Smith. (Aye (5): Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Clark)

Final Council action · Apr 8, 202610 yes · 0 no · 2 absent

Final action on 2026-097: Vacate NE Couch St and NE Davis St west of NE 97th Ave subject to certain conditions and reservations (VAC-10140)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Mar 9, 20265 yes

Motion to send the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-097, to the full Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Smith. (Aye (5): Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Clark)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:06 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:24 AM PDT
Evidence hash
f440763d035fc4b3
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council