Decisions/2025-251
Ordinance2025-251

Should Portland vacate a portion of an unnamed road near the intersection of NE 33rd Dr and NE Marine Dr subject to certain conditions and reservations (VAC-10133)?

The purpose of this legislation is to vacate a portion of unnamed road near the intersection of NE 33rd Drive and NE Marine Drive (the “Street Area”), as recommended in the Bureau Director Report. On May 27, 2021, PBOT RPS staff certified a petition for the vacation of the Street Area, with the petition initiated by J.D. Watumull (the “Petitioner”). The Street Area is currently unpaved, is unimproved to City standards, and is located along a dead-end street segment that only connects to NE 33rd Drive. The petition stated that the reason for the vacation is to consolidate the Street Area to the adjoining property for development of a vehicle washing station and a diesel and gasoline fueling station under Land Use Case No. 19-252462 LU. The Ordinance complies with state law under ORS 271 and City Code, Chapter 17.84.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Vacate a portion of an unnamed road near the intersection of NE 33rd Dr and NE Marine Dr subject to certain conditions and reservations (VAC-10133)

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The purpose of this legislation is to vacate a portion of unnamed road near the intersection of NE 33rd Drive and NE Marine Drive (the “Street Area”), as recommended in the Bureau Director Report. On May 27, 2021, PBOT RPS staff certified a petition for the vacation of the Street Area, with the petition initiated by J.D. Watumull (the “Petitioner”). The Street Area is currently unpaved, is unimproved to City standards, and is located along a dead-end street segment that only connects to NE 33rd Drive. The petition stated that the reason for the vacation is to consolidate the Street Area to the adjoining property for development of a vehicle washing station and a diesel and gasoline fueling station under Land Use Case No. 19-252462 LU. The Ordinance complies with state law under ORS 271 and City Code, Chapter 17.84.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

Pursuant to ORS 271.080, the Petitioner obtained the required signatures from surrounding property owners in the ‘affected area’ as stated in said statute, showing support of the vacation request. As an additional requirement of the statute, the notice of the public hearing has been published in the Daily Journal of Commerce and public notice signs have been physically posted near the Street Area.City Bureaus, government agencies, public utilities and affected neighborhood and business associations provided comments for the Street Area. PBOT did not receive any objections to the vacation request.The Planning Commission (“PC”) advertised and then held a public hearing on January 25, 2022. Although not required by State Statute or City Code, letters were mailed to all the surrounding neighbors within an ‘affected area’ as defined by ORS 271 to notify them of the public hearing thereby giving them an opportunity to be heard. Both the 40 Mile Loop Land Trust and Portland resident Walter Valenta submitted public testimony requesting that a new trail easement be granted as a condition of approval for the Street Vacation. PBOT and Portland Parks & Recreation have required this same condition, have reviewed and approved the location of said easement, and is included as a part of the Ordinance. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association submitted testimony expressing concern about the easement location and the Petitioner’s plan to build a washout station and fueling station within close proximity to the Columbia River. The proposed development at this location is subject to environmental review and approval by both the City of Portland and the State of Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality. The review and other development requirements are not a part of the street vacation process. The PC ultimately recommended that City Council approve the vacation request.There do not appear to be any other impacts to the community from vacating the Street Area. No opposition to this street vacation request is expected and no one has expressed their desire to testify at the hearing. There is no future public involvement anticipated since the Ordinance will conclude the street vacation process.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The process for vacating streets is a cost recovery program, typically paid for by the Petitioner, and does not have a net impact on PBOT’s budget. Expenses for processing a street vacation request typically range between $11,000 and $20,000+, depending on the complexity. This street vacation falls in the middle of the range and is estimated (with moderate confidence) to be approximately $17,000. Fees paid by the Petitioner for this street vacation will cover the actual expenditures incurred by City staff for the processing of this request. The SAP Cost Object is 9TR000002967. These expenses are occurring in FY 20-21, 21-22, 22-23, 23-24, and 24-25. This legislation does not affect staffing levels, nor will it result in a new or modified financial obligation or benefit now or in the future. If City Council does not approve the Ordinance, the Street Area will remain as public right-of-way, and the related surplus land sale will be cancelled. The abutting property owner will need to extend their existing lease with the City for the continued use of the Street Area for commercial purposes. Any newly constructed, privately owned structures will need to be built outside of the Street Area.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192110

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The Portland Bureau of Transportation (“PBOT”), Real Property Services (“RPS”), received a request from J. D. Watumull (the “Petitioner”) on April 15, 2021, to vacate a portion of unnamed road near the intersection of NE 33rd Drive and NE Marine Drive as described on Exhibit 1 and depicted on Exhibit 2, (the “Street Area”). In 1961, Multnomah County acquired the Street Area to build a proposed traffic slip lane and other road improvements at the intersection of NE 33rd Drive and NE Marine Drive. Multnomah County never constructed the road improvement project. Jurisdiction of county roads, including the Street Area were transferred from Multnomah County to the City of Portland (“City”) when the surrounding neighborhood was annexed into the city. In 2019, the City acquired fee title ownership of the Street Area from Multnomah County through a Quitclaim Deed, recorded as Document #2019-085747, Multnomah County Deed Records. Since fee title ownership is still held by the City at this time, the Street Area will be mapped by Multnomah County as a City owned tax parcel upon completion of the street vacation process. A transfer of ownership of the Street Area is proposed in the companion ordinance and will occur through the separate surplus land sale process if approved by City Council. All abutters and the requisite number of property owners signed the petition, pursuant to ORS 271.080. RPS staff and the Office of the City Auditor (the “Auditor”) verified and certified all signatures on May 27, 2021. The petition states that the reason for the vacation is to consolidate the Street Area to the adjoining property for development of a vehicle washing station and a diesel and gasoline fueling station under Land Use Case No. 19-252462 LU. The vacation is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with recommendations made by the PBOT Bureau Director and the Planning Commission, as provided in the Bureau Director’s Report, dated August 12, 2022, and on file with the Auditor and PBOT. In accordance with ORS 271.100, the Portland City Council (the “Council”) fixed a time and place for public hearing before the Council; RPS staff published notices in the Daily Journal of Commerce and physically posted signs at the site in the area proposed for vacation. In accordance with ORS 271.190, since the area to be vacated lies within 5,000 feet of the harbor line, RPS staff secured written approval of the proposed vacation from the Port of Portland. City staff with PBOT Transportation Planning and Portland Parks & Recreation have requested that easement rights be granted to the City to support the future construction of a portion of the Marine Drive Trail / 40 Mile Loop to be located either in or near the Street Area. Since the City currently holds fee title ownership of the Street Area, establishment of these easement rights is included as a part of the surplus land sale process. City staff with the Bureau of Environmental Services (“BES”) have requested that easement rights be granted to the City to support the continued operation and maintenance of an existing 36-inch-wide pressure main. Said easement area will be 20-feet-wide. Said main is publicly owned and is located within the Street Area. Since the City currently holds fee title ownership of the Street Area, establishment of these easement rights is included as a part of the surplus land sale process. City staff with the BES have requested that City access be maintained for regular maintenance of the existing pressure valves identified by BES as facility AMS391. Said facility is publicly owned and is located within the Street Area. An unobstructed area must be provided to accommodate a large PUMA truck alongside the vault and the maintenance holes. Any paving must match the grade of the maintenance holes as any modifications to the vault lid are not advised. Since the City currently holds fee title ownership of the Street Area, establishment of these easement rights is included as a part of the surplus land sale process. Other procedural requirements of ORS 271 have been complied with, and the Council having held a public hearing, finds no objections were made or filed hereto, and it is in the public interest to vacate the Street Area.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Street Area, more particularly described as follows, is hereby vacated: As described on Exhibit 1 and depicted on Exhibit 2 attached and incorporate by reference. Containing 48,219 square feet, more or lessThe vacation of the Street Area is granted subject to the following conditions:In accordance with ORS 271.120 and City policy, the street vacation ordinance (this “Ordinance”), shall not cause or require the removal or abandonment of any sewer, water or gas main, conduit of any kind, wire, pole or thing used, or intended to be used, for any public service. Subject to Paragraph B.2. below, this Ordinance will reserve an easement for the owner of any such utility or thing to maintain, continue, repair, reconstruct, renew, replace, rebuild, and/or enlarge any and all such thing; that no building or structure of any kind shall be built or erected within a distance of ten (10) feet from the centerline of any such utility, except with the prior written consent of the City Administrator and the owner of the utility and that any and all contemplated building plans in said vacated area shall be submitted for approval to the City Administrator and to the Director of the Bureau of Permitting & Development, to the end that such construction may be so adjusted with reference to all public utilities in said areas as to cause a minimum of danger or inconvenience to the public and to the owner of such utility and to protect and preserve the same as presently constructed or hereinafter reconstructed, renewed, replaced and/or enlarged. Removal or relocation of existing utilities in the street vacation area will require written agreements between the property owner(s) and owner(s) of the utilities.Notwithstanding Condition B.1., this Ordinance will serve as a full release of City interests in the Street Area and will provide City Bureaus with the authority necessary to take all other legal actions as may be reasonably necessary (including the issuance of quitclaim deeds acknowledging the release of any interests) to achieve this intent.If any property, encumbered by an easement reserved in this Ordinance, is ever rededicated as public right-of-way, that portion of the easement located in the rededicated right-of-way shall automatically be terminated.City costs associated with processing the street vacation petition shall be paid in full before the City records this Ordinance.In the event the Petitioner fails to fully comply with the above conditions within one year of Council adopting this Ordinance, Council may repeal this Ordinance at its sole discretion.Section 2. The Property owner shall file with the Auditor, in form approved by the City Attorney, a document in writing, accepting the terms and conditions of the Ordinance. Section 3. Notice is given that the street vacation will not be effective until a certified copy of the Ordinance has been recorded by the City in Multnomah County Deed Records. Prerequisites to recording this Ordinance are that 30 days have passed after final Council passage of this Ordinance, that all conditions of this Ordinance have been met, and that all vacation costs have been paid.Section 4. After the prerequisites to recording this Ordinance have been met, the Auditor shall return a certified copy of this Ordinance and the acceptance thereof, to RPS staff, which shall, at the expense of the Petitioner, file with the recorder, the assessor, and the surveyor of the county in which said property is located, the certified copy of this Ordinance and the acceptance, and any map, plat or other record which may be required by law. RPS staff shall return a copy of the recorded ordinance to the Auditor and retain the original recorded ordinance in RWA File No. 9235.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes5 meetings · 3 votes
Read all 2 exact motions
Sep 22, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-251, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Green (Aye (4): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney, Zimmerman; Absent (1): Novick)

Jun 23, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send the Ordinance, Document Number 2025-251, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (3): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (2): Novick, Zimmerman)

Final Council action · Oct 8, 202510 yes · 0 no · 2 absent

Final action on 2025-251: Vacate a portion of an unnamed road near the intersection of NE 33rd Dr and NE Marine Dr subject to certain conditions and reservations (VAC-10133)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 22, 20254 yes · 1 absent

Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-251, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Green (Aye (4): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney, Zimmerman; Absent (1): Novick)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 23, 20253 yes · 2 absent

Motion to send the Ordinance, Document Number 2025-251, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (3): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (2): Novick, Zimmerman)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:10 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:29 AM PDT
Evidence hash
892d3803d244c661
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council

  6. Council Action

    Referred to committee

  7. Council Action

    Referred to City Council