Decisions/2026-010
Ordinance2026-010

Should Portland adopt a supplemental budget for the Portland Housing Bureau for FY 2025-26?

To appropriate funds discovered within the Rental Services Office Fund that are currently unrecognized in the FY25-26 Adopted budget. These unspent funds will be deposited into Portland Housing Bureau's Housing Investment Fund (HIF), administered through PHB Rental Services Office (RSO), and the General Fund, in accordance with Ordinance 189650 and Portland Policy FIN-3.11.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Adopt a supplemental budget for the Portland Housing Bureau for FY 2025-26

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

To appropriate funds discovered within the Rental Services Office Fund that are currently unrecognized in the FY25-26 Adopted budget. These unspent funds will be deposited into Portland Housing Bureau's Housing Investment Fund (HIF), administered through PHB Rental Services Office (RSO), and the General Fund, in accordance with Ordinance 189650 and Portland Policy FIN-3.11.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

This ordinance amends the FY 2025-26 appropriation schedule makes one-time funds available to Portland Housing Bureau toward housing, homelessness intervention, and real estate activity in accordance with Portland Policy FIN-3.11 and Ordinance 189650. Exhibit B identifies programs, projects, and activities that require appropriation adjustments or transfers for appropriation within bureau and fund budgets.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Placed on file

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation

Recorded · 8–4

Read the exact motion or vote question

Motion to divide the question to vote on Items 2025-478, 2026-010, and 2026-070: Moved by Smith. Vote called to postpone Item 2026-010: (Aye (8): Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (4): Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Clark, Zimmerman)

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The ordinance is a one-time appropriation of $20.7 Million in unspent funds, increasing Portland Housing Bureau's beginning fund balance by that amount and amending the FY 2025-26 Appropriation Schedule.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents8 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 2026-010

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Show 2 more documents
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The Portland Housing Bureau (PHB) has identified $20.7 million in Rental Service Office fees that need to be programmed and spent at the direction of Council as outlined in a November 22, 2025, memo to Council from the Deputy City Administrator. Ordinance 189650 requires that the Revenue Division deposit revenue from the residential rental unit registration fee into PHB's Housing Investment Fund (HIF) and that the revenue be administered by the PHB Rental Services Office (RSO) and further allows the Revenue Division to cover collection costs with fee revenue. Portland Policy FIN-3.11, which is a binding City Policy, describes the HIF's purpose as follows, "...support the City's housing initiatives, all of which serve to develop or preserve affordable housing in Portland or help low-and moderate-income individuals access affordable housing. These programs include affordable housing services and financial assistance, the Risk Mitigation Pool and fee-supported activities (e.g., the administration of City limited tax abatements and system development charge waivers)". The RSO may use the funds for various uses so long as they are related to the stated purpose of the HIF. Exhibit A, attached, includes all incremental changes to the City appropriation schedule as a result of this budget amendment. Exhibit B identifies programs, projects, or activities that require appropriation adjustments or transfer or appropriation within bureau and fund budgets. This supplemental budget action only impacts the current Fiscal Year budget, 2025-26, appropriating $20.7 millionNOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Appropriation Schedule is hereby amended by adjusting appropriations to increase bureau beginning fund balance and operating expenditures in the Portland Housing Bureau by $20.7 million, with specific changes shown in Exhibits A and B.The actions amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Revised Budget contained in this ordinance are binding City policy.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 3 votes

Recorded amendments

Jan 12, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Green Amendment 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos (Aye (2): Avalos, Green; Nay (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman). Motion failed to pass.

Read all 4 exact motions
Feb 19, 2026 · Procedural · Recorded

Motion to postpone Items 2025-478, 2026-010, and 2026-070 indefinitely: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Avalos.

Feb 19, 2026 · Procedural · Recorded

Motion to divide the question to vote on Items 2025-478, 2026-010, and 2026-070: Moved by Smith. Vote called to postpone Item 2026-010: (Aye (8): Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (4): Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Clark, Zimmerman)

Jan 12, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Green Amendment 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos (Aye (2): Avalos, Green; Nay (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman). Motion failed to pass.

Jan 12, 2026 · Main · Passed

Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-010, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman; Nay (2): Avalos, Green)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Feb 19, 20268 yes · 4 no

Motion to divide the question to vote on Items 2025-478, 2026-010, and 2026-070: Moved by Smith. Vote called to postpone Item 2026-010: (Aye (8): Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Dunphy; Nay (4): Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Clark, Zimmerman)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jan 12, 20262 yes · 3 no

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Green Amendment 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos (Aye (2): Avalos, Green; Nay (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jan 12, 20263 yes · 2 no

Motion to refer the Ordinance, Document Number 2026-010, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman; Nay (2): Avalos, Green)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

7 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.

Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:04 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:23 AM PDT
Evidence hash
7fe4479b84b2c9c1
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Placed on file

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Postponed

  4. Council Action

    Referred to City Council