Decisions/2026-124
Ordinance2026-124

Should Portland adopt and implement the Moderate-Income Revolving Loan Program?

The ordinance establishes and implements the City of Portland's Moderate Income Revolving Loan (MIRL) Program, authorized under state law, to expand the production of housing affordable to moderate-income households. It enables the City to access and deploy state-provided financing through the MIRL Program. It authorizes entry into agreements with Oregon Community Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to administer state resources. The legislation is intended to address a documented housing shortage by creating new financial tools to support the development of housing for households earning between 60% to 120% of Area Median Income. It further designates Prosper Portland to administer the program, aligning local urban renewal and tax increment financing (TIF) resources with state funding to accelerate middle-income housing production and increase overall housing availability in the city. The Oregon Legislature created the MIRL program under SB 1537 (2024) and recently amended the program under HB 4037 (2026). Statute requires the City to adopt an ordinance authorizing the program in order to access MIRL funds from OHCS.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Adopt and implement the Moderate-Income Revolving Loan Program

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The ordinance establishes and implements the City of Portland's Moderate Income Revolving Loan (MIRL) Program, authorized under state law, to expand the production of housing affordable to moderate-income households. It enables the City to access and deploy state-provided financing through the MIRL Program. It authorizes entry into agreements with Oregon Community Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to administer state resources. The legislation is intended to address a documented housing shortage by creating new financial tools to support the development of housing for households earning between 60% to 120% of Area Median Income. It further designates Prosper Portland to administer the program, aligning local urban renewal and tax increment financing (TIF) resources with state funding to accelerate middle-income housing production and increase overall housing availability in the city. The Oregon Legislature created the MIRL program under SB 1537 (2024) and recently amended the program under HB 4037 (2026). Statute requires the City to adopt an ordinance authorizing the program in order to access MIRL funds from OHCS.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

In recent years, the City of Portland has identified a significant and growing need for additional housing, particularly for moderate-income households who do not qualify for traditional affordable housing programs but remain priced out of the market. Through the City's Housing Needs Analysis and Housing Production Strategy, the City Council established a goal of supporting the development of new housing units and identified the need for additional financing tools to incentivize middle-income housing production.The legislation directly supports the City's broader housing goals by creating new financing mechanisms to facilitate the development of middle-income housing and increase overall housing availability across Portland.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

State statute requires the City to enter into a master agreement with OHCS to borrow and repay MIRL funds. The City will pass through State (OHCS) funds to Prosper Portland via IGA, which will pass through these funds to eligible projects in the form of grants. Repayment of the OHCS funds occurs by either 1) the County's collection of a property tax fee-in-lieu paid by the residential developer; or 2) TIF backed by the City's full faith and credit if the project is located within an existing TIF district. The Ordinance directs that no more than $20 million in TIF may be pledged as a repayment source at any given time to limit the City's risk. The amount of resources requested from OHCS will be established by methodology within the MIRL statute, not the City. The State will make funding decisions on a first-come, first-served basis. There is no direct financial or budgetary impact to the City.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents11 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192200

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Show 5 more documents
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:City of Portland adopted the Housing Needs Analysis which identified the need for 120,000 additional housing units by 2045, and adopted the Housing Production Strategy to set forth actions over the next five years to support housing production, including the creation of new financial incentives to support the construction of middle-income housing.City of Portland has established an Inclusionary Housing Program including regulatory options that in certain instances include a 10-year tax exemption on some or all residential units and residential related portions of the building.Prosper Portland manages the investment of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) resources in 11 active TIF Districts to help fulfill Portland's goal of creating healthy, vibrant neighborhoods throughout the city – including the production of middle-income housing units that do not meet the affordability requirements of the affordable housing set-aside policy.In accordance with ORS 307.213 et seq., as amended by HB 4037 (2026), the City of Portland desires to establish a local Moderate-Income Revolving Loan Program (the "Local MIRL Program") to spur certain housing development activities within the City of Portland using a tax increment financing-based resource structure capitalized by the State of Oregon.The City of Portland desires its Local MIRL Program to provide financial assistance in the form of grants to developers of Eligible Housing Projects ("Developers") for occupants earning 50% to 120% of Area Median Income ("AMI") using funds obtained from the state through the MIRL Program.The City of Portland seeks to facilitate the development of low and middle-income housing to increase affordability and housing availability within the City of Portland.The City of Portland has consulted with the governing bodies of Washington County, Clackamas County, and Multnomah County regarding the City of Portland's desire to establish a Local MIRL Program.The City of Portland desires to delegate to Prosper Portland, the economic and development and urban renewal agency for the City or Portland, authority to administer the Local MIRL Program including the review of application materials, entering into grant agreements, and conducting program compliance. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Adopt and implement the Local MIRL Program, in accordance with the terms of Exhibit A, Local MIRL Program.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 7 votes

Recorded amendments

Jun 4, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 2: Moved by Green and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (11): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)

Jun 4, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 3: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy; Nay (6): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Jun 4, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 4: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Dunphy; Nay (7): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading June 18, 2026 at 2:00 pm.

Apr 7, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (2): Koyama Lane, Green; Nay (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Avalos). Motion failed to pass.

Apr 7, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend the ordinance, Finding 5 to strikethrough 60% and replace with 50% and Finding 6 to add "low and" after "development of", and Exhibit A, Section 4 to strikethrough "75 units" and replace with "20 units", and Section 5 to strikethrough "75 new housing units" and replace with "20 new housing units": Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Avalos)

Apr 7, 2026 · Passed

Motion to refer the Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2026-124, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Avalos; Nay (1): Green)

Read all 6 exact motions
Jun 4, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 2: Moved by Green and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (11): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)

Jun 4, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 3: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy; Nay (6): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Jun 4, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 4: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Dunphy; Nay (7): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading June 18, 2026 at 2:00 pm.

Apr 7, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (2): Koyama Lane, Green; Nay (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Avalos). Motion failed to pass.

Apr 7, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend the ordinance, Finding 5 to strikethrough 60% and replace with 50% and Finding 6 to add "low and" after "development of", and Exhibit A, Section 4 to strikethrough "75 units" and replace with "20 units", and Section 5 to strikethrough "75 new housing units" and replace with "20 new housing units": Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Avalos)

Apr 7, 2026 · Main · Passed

Motion to refer the Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2026-124, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Avalos; Nay (1): Green)

Final Council action · Jun 18, 202611 yes · 0 no · 1 absent

Final action on 2026-124: Adopt and implement the Moderate-Income Revolving Loan Program

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 4, 202611 yes · 1 no

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 2: Moved by Green and seconded by Ryan. (Aye (11): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 4, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 3: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy; Nay (6): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 4, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Green 4: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Dunphy; Nay (7): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading June 18, 2026 at 2:00 pm.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Apr 7, 20262 yes · 3 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (2): Koyama Lane, Green; Nay (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Avalos). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Apr 7, 20265 yes

Motion to amend the ordinance, Finding 5 to strikethrough 60% and replace with 50% and Finding 6 to add "low and" after "development of", and Exhibit A, Section 4 to strikethrough "75 units" and replace with "20 units", and Section 5 to strikethrough "75 new housing units" and replace with "20 new housing units": Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Avalos)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Apr 7, 20264 yes · 1 no

Motion to refer the Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2026-124, to City Council with the recommendation it be passed: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Avalos; Nay (1): Green)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

10 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.

Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:04 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:23 AM PDT
Evidence hash
415c643eccbbb23d
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council as amended