Decisions/2026-138
Report2026-138

Should Portland appoint members to the Design Commission?

The appointments of these Commissioners is required by Portland City Code [Title 33] to fulfill quorum requirements for Type II Appeals and Type III Land Use Reviews.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Appoint members to the Design Commission

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The appointments of these Commissioners is required by Portland City Code [Title 33] to fulfill quorum requirements for Type II Appeals and Type III Land Use Reviews.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The Portland Permitting & Development continually advertises positions for the Commission through its webpages, announcements of upcoming positions, and newsletters. These media announcements are widely circulated in the design, development, and neighborhood community news outlets and web pages.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Accepted

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The Commissioner appointments are citizen-volunteer positions, so no revenue or expenses are incurred by these positions.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionReport 2026-138

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

TO THE COUNCIL:As Mayor, I request Council confirmation of the following appointments to the Design Commission.The Design Commission provides leadership and expertise on urban design and architecture and advances the purpose of the Design overlay zone. The Design overlay zone ensures that Portland is both a city designed for people and a city in harmony with nature. The Design overlay zone supports the city's evolution within current and emerging centers of civic life. The overlay promotes design excellence in the built environment through the application of additional design standards and design guidelines. The Portland Design Commission hears Land Use applications for proposals within design districts (Type III applications and Type II appeal applications).I recommend two candidates for appointment.AppointmentMembership CategoryTermTerm DurationHanifah AbiotoCity Arts1st5/1/26 – 4/30/30Tommy SolomonLandscape Architect1st12/1/26 – 11/30/30Hanifah Abioto:The City Arts position is a dual-serving volunteer committee appointment – the recommendation was provided by the Office of Arts & Culture (OA&C) Public Arts Administrator Eric Frederickson, where the candidate will serve on the Design Commission and the OA&C Public Art Advisory Committee (currently in the process of being created).Hanifah Abioto is co-owner of an art and design firm with her family, Studio Abioto, that focuses on Black diasporic art, history, and lifestyle. Studio Abioto has recently shifted towards art curation, public and private, following some recent contracts with publicly funded buildings.Hanifah works as a Grants & Communications Coordinator at Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods, the Portland District 2 Coalition Office. Hanifah works primarily with Civic Life and Portland City Councilors on occasion.Additionally, as a part of Studio Abioto and in conjunction with a couple of other artists, Hanifah has held a contract with Parks and Rec/RACC to produce the Art Plan for the North Portland Aquatic Center.Statement from Hanifah Abioto: Moving to Portland in 2010, I have witnessed profound change in a city shaped by the constant intersection of nature and development. Living in a place that has transformed so deeply has made me attentive to how design shapes wellbeing and quietly communicates what is possible, welcomed, or overlooked in our city - often long before anyone can consciously name it, and sometimes long after harm has already occurred. As an artist who returns to sound, writing, and printmaking as primary architects of my work, I am trained to notice scale, material, rhythm, and absence, and how these elements shape how people experience themselves in space and place. This way of seeing is why I am both equipped and invested in contributing to Portland through the Design Commission, where there is an opportunity to uplift lived, collective, and diverse experience through public art and design. Alongside my artistic practice, my work administering grants to community organizations and engaging closely with Portland neighbors has given me a clear view of how design decisions translate into lived outcomes and perceptions of belonging. Sometimes this view is not clean, but it is clear nevertheless. I have seen how public investment can feel thoughtful or extractive, how process affects trust, and how clarity and care at the design level shape long-term public benefit. My background in public art planning and curation allows me to work comfortably within adopted design guidelines while bringing a contextual, perceptive lens to design review, in collaboration with fellow commissioners and in care for Portlanders' experiences now and into the future.Tommy Solomon: This Landscape Architect position is an early appointment for the future vacancy of the current Landscape Architect position which ends November 2026. By "pre-appointing" this positions alongside the City Arts Candidate above, these two volunteer Commissioners can be paired in their training for service on the Design Commission. This practice by PP&D Staff has proven highly effective and efficient and appreciated by prior Design Commission appointees.Tommy Solomon is Owner and Principal of Ground Workshop, an award-winning landscape architecture practice based in Portland, Oregon. A licensed Landscape Architect, Tommy has led a wide range of nationally recognized projects spanning the public realm, institutional, housing, and ecological landscapes.Prior to founding Ground Workshop in 2019, Tommy held senior leadership roles at 2.ink Studio in Portland, Oregon, and Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects in Charlottesville, Virginia, where he worked on complex, interdisciplinary projects across the nation.Architecturally trained, Tommy earned a Master of Architecture from the University of Virginia and a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Architecture from the University of Memphis. This dual background in architecture and landscape architecture informs his ability to evaluate projects holistically - considering urban design, public space, environmental performance, and long-term stewardship.Statement from Tommy Solomon: As a practicing Landscape Architect, I take great pride in the opportunity to help shape communities through design. Having lived, worked, and raised family in Portland since 2014, it has been a privilege to contribute to the city's evolving public realm, including projects that have come before the Portland Design Commission. In collaborative settings, I strive to foster productive dialogue by being prepared, open-minded, and respectful of differing viewpoints. I value clear communication, consensus-building, and creating space for diverse perspectives - principles that guide my professional practice and personal approach alike. My work is grounded in humility, curiosity, and a commitment to understanding how design decisions affect people with different needs, cultural contexts, and abilities. I hold deep respect for the Portland Design Commission and the responsibility it carries, and I am honored to support its mission in service of Portland's built environment.Together, these candidates bring a wide range of experience, professional expertise, and community perspectives that will strengthen the Design Commission and the City.I recommend that Hanifah Abioto, City Arts, and Tommy Solomon, Landscape Architect, be appointed to the Design Commission for first terms as noted above.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Apr 15, 2026 · Main · Recorded

Motion to refer the Report, Document Number 2026-138, to City Council with the recommendation it be accepted: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (12): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal )

Final Council action · May 6, 202612 yes · 0 no

Final action on 2026-138: Appoint members to the Design Commission

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Apr 15, 202612 yes

Motion to refer the Report, Document Number 2026-138, to City Council with the recommendation it be accepted: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (12): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal )

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

An implementation owner or milestone was not found deterministically.

Unknown
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:05 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:24 AM PDT
Evidence hash
1b613940009052d7
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Accepted

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Confirmed

  4. Council Action

    Referred to City Council