Decisions/2025-160
Emergency ordinance2025-160

Should Portland amend the Portland Police Association City Employee Benefits Program for FY 2025-26?

The purpose of this legislation is to request authorization to amend the City’s Employee Benefits Program to reflect necessary plan design changes for the City’s plan offerings beginning July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026. The Portland Police Association (PPA) and Bureau of Human Resources have met since June of 2024 to prepare for increased healthcare costs. Some of the changes are recommended by PPA and the remaining changes were discussed with PPA and are recommended by the Mayor and City Administrator with the input of the Bureau of Human Resources.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

*Amend the Portland Police Association City Employee Benefits Program for FY 2025-26

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The purpose of this legislation is to request authorization to amend the City’s Employee Benefits Program to reflect necessary plan design changes for the City’s plan offerings beginning July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026. The Portland Police Association (PPA) and Bureau of Human Resources have met since June of 2024 to prepare for increased healthcare costs. Some of the changes are recommended by PPA and the remaining changes were discussed with PPA and are recommended by the Mayor and City Administrator with the input of the Bureau of Human Resources.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The Health Fund Budgets for FY 2025-26 and the Payroll Clearing Fund include appropriations in support of the plan design changes.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionEmergency ordinance 192049

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds: The Bureau of Human Resources is responsible for the administration of employee health and welfare benefit plans. The City’s health insurance costs for the Portland Police Association – Portland Police Bureau (PPA-PPB) are facing a 16% increase for the 2025-26 fiscal year, which is valued at $2,000,000 more than current fiscal year. The City has budgeted 8% employee health insurance increases for this period. As required by the parties collective bargaining agreement, the Bureau of Human Resources worked with PPA-PPB on plan design recommendations for the City’s self-insured and insured plans in an effort to agree on changes to bring costs within the target budget rate. The PPA Board recommends the following plan design changes which have negligible impact or are already factored into the renewal costs:Continue five additional Employee Assistance Program visits, totaling thirteen plan visits per plan year.Hold Moda/Delta Dental rate flat and move savings to CityNet medical plan.Remove prior authorization requirement for nutritional therapy under CityNet medical.Add CirrusMD virtual visits to CityNet medical to expand virtual visit access.Add RationalMed program to CityNet pharmacy coverage to identify potential safety issues or gaps in care.Cover sedation services under Class II benefits for Moda/Delta Dental members who self-identify as having intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.Add Virta coverage for weight loss support and diabetes reversal under CityNet medical.Add access to cancer support under CityNet medical.Additionally, the PPA board recommends the following plan design changes which reduce the renewal rate by 4.1% for a total renewal of 11.9%: Add Garner, a health navigation support program, to the CityNet medical plan which provides a $1,000 Health Reimbursement Account financial incentive to refer members high quality outcome doctors.Add Hinge Health virtual musculoskeletal therapy coverage to CityNet medica.Increase CityNet medical stop loss limit from $300,000 to $350,000.Implement surgery Centers of Excellence (COE) under CityNet medical.Add EviCore to CityNet medical for utilization management for advanced imaging and cardiology management.Add EviCore to CityNet medical for utilization management for utilization management on musculoskeletal review.Adjust Kaiser medical plan benefits to add $150 deductible, $1,000 out-of-pocket maximum, three tier pharmacy benefit, $15 copay for primary care, $25 for specialty care, $35 for urgent care, $15 for simple labs, $75 for complex labs and 20% coinsurance after deductible for outpatient surgery, inpatient services, emergency room, and ambulance. The Health Fund Budgets for FY 2025-26 and the Payroll Clearing Fund include appropriations valued at 8% as identified above and included in the City Administrator’s recommendation for the FY 2025-26 budget. Funding the gap between the 8% presumed cost and 11.9% cost will increase the impact to the 2025-26 budget by $638,650. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: The Council hereby adopts the recommendations of the Council and the PPA-PPB Board for fiscal year 2025-26, as reflected in attached Exhibit A. Section 2. The Council declares that an emergency exists to avoid undue and costly delay in providing benefits to plan participants; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by Council.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 2 votes

Recorded amendments

Apr 17, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend the ordinance to reduce the renewal rate to 11.9%: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Smith.(Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)

Read all 1 exact motions
Apr 17, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend the ordinance to reduce the renewal rate to 11.9%: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Smith.(Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Apr 17, 202512 yes

Motion to amend the ordinance to reduce the renewal rate to 11.9%: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Smith.(Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)

Final Council action · Apr 16, 202511 yes · 1 no

Final action on 2025-160: *Amend the Portland Police Association City Employee Benefits Program for FY 2025-26

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:15 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 14, 2026, 2:24 AM PDT
Evidence hash
06e0588626b53532
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended