Decisions/2025-194
Resolution2025-194

Should Portland require City Administrator to develop Citywide Asset Management Strategy to establish priorities and practices to address asset management maturity and…

The city owns billions of dollars worth of public assets and infrastructure that has been underinvested in. As noted in recently published audit, the city needs to take on a more strategic approach to managing our assets and infrastructure. This provides direction to create a strategic and financial plan.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Require City Administrator to develop Citywide Asset Management Strategy to establish priorities and practices to address asset management maturity and financial planning gaps

This is one chapter of a larger storyCity asset strategy

How should Portland prioritize maintenance and replacement across roughly $80 billion in public assets when needs exceed available money?

Start with the full topic dossier
Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The city owns billions of dollars worth of public assets and infrastructure that has been underinvested in. As noted in recently published audit, the city needs to take on a more strategic approach to managing our assets and infrastructure. This provides direction to create a strategic and financial plan.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

Our infrastructure and assets are essential to the delivery of services and quality of life to all who live, work, and play in the city of Portland. Ensuring the safety and reliability of these assets is critical to the everyday safety of Portlanders. Establishing a strategic plan to address how the city manages and invests in our assets and infrastructure is a necessary first step to a logical approach and alignment of how we take care of past and ongoing public investments and their impacts to services to Portlanders.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Adopted

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This will not have direct impact on the FY2025-2026 budgets but will require active staff participation and associated resource prioritization in the short term and long-term strategic planning may impact future budgetary needs.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionResolution 37715

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

WHEREAS, the City owns billions of dollars’ worth of public assets and infrastructure, including: built infrastructure such as roads, streets, water and sewer systems, buildings, and facilities; equipment, technology, and data management assets such as telecommunications systems and programs; and natural infrastructures such as natural areas, parks, and trees, and waterways; andWHEREAS, these assets and infrastructure allow the City to deliver basic services to the public; and the City’s infrastructure – its streets, parks, water and sewer systems, arts and culture venues, public safety facilities, and technology – form the foundation of daily life and directly impact the health, safety, and well-being of every Portlander; andWHEREAS, Portlanders experience the City’s infrastructure every day – when they drink clean water, flush their toilets, walk or roll down safe sidewalks, visit a park, commute to school or work, and rely on fundamental City services like public safety; andWHEREAS, failing assets are a threat to public safety, public health, and our economic future; andWHEREAS, decades of underinvestment have led to deteriorating assets, from poorly maintained streets to unkempt parks to critical service interruptions; andWHEREAS, a strategic approach to asset management can help ensure clean drinking water, safe and well-maintained streets, reliable sewer and stormwater services, welcoming parks, vibrant arts, and cultural venues, and dependable public safety systems for all Portlanders, now and for future generations; andWHEREAS, in 2021 through Resolution 37551, the City recognized the importance of the natural and built physical infrastructure the City owns and manages, and directed the adoption of an asset management policy by capital asset owning and managing bureaus; andWHEREAS, in April 2025, the Auditor’s Audit Services reported that the City has underinvested in routine and preventive maintenance of its aging assets, which created a backlog of costly and increasingly urgent needs that the City does not have the funding to meet. The City has not adopted a unified Citywide asset management strategy due to the pre-Charter commission form of government, decision-making processes, and lack of long-term approach to address the infrastructure funding gap; andWHEREAS, the transition to a Mayor-Council form of government provides an opportunity for a more coordinated approach to asset management and supports service areas and bureaus working together to reduce life cycle costs for delivering services to Portlanders; andWHEREAS, infrastructure asset management involves a comprehensive approach to make the best decisions to manage our built and natural assets to obtain the greatest public value at the lowest life cycle cost and an acceptable level of risk; andWHEREAS, the estimated annual funding gap between overall infrastructure needs and dedicated resources is expected to grow exponentially unless addressed; andWHEREAS, coordinated asset management planning helps avoid unnecessary repairs and emergency costs, reducing long-term financial burdens on Portland ratepayers and taxpayers; andWHEREAS, responsible stewardship of City assets ensures that today’s investments do not become tomorrow’s burdens, and supports an intergenerational commitment to leaving our children and grandchildren a city that works better than we found it; andWHEREAS, the City owns over $80 billion worth of assets and the Public Works Service Area is responsible for over 90% of the City’s assets-including systems that deliver clean drinking water, treat wastewater, and maintain our streets and public spaces across Portland.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Administrator, pursuant to Charter Section 2-406(j) shall submit a report to Council, a new Citywide Asset Management Strategy, that includes but is not limited to: Identification of current best practices for asset management decision making with long-range financial planning, with compliance and financial implications meaningfully informing enterprise-wide policies and standards;Incorporation of organization needs, existing assets and asset management capabilities, and operational realities that may support or impede effective implementation of a strategy;Development of a standardized approach to asset management across all bureaus that recognizes different needs;Inclusion of appropriate stakeholders and bureau-level technical expertise, to support cross-disciplinary collaboration and accountability;Incorporation of sustainability and climate resilience may be included to ensure Portland’s infrastructure is prepared to meet the challenges of a changing environment – for this generation and the next;Inclusion of options and opportunities for funding, including but not limited to raising revenue or allocating funding for deferred maintenance of and regulatory compliance for existing infrastructure, system growth, and infill;Inclusion of a proposal for monitoring, communicating, and updating Council and other stakeholders on the status and progress of citywide asset management; andRecommendations for how and when to convene Service Area stakeholders to assess the scope and timing of potential City capital project needs, timing, and eligibility.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: The Report on a new Citywide Asset Management Strategy should be submitted to the Council no later than September 30, 2026.The City Administrator and the Chief Financial Officer shall develop a proposed strategy for a Citywide general obligation bond program that must be included in the proposed Citywide Asset Management Strategy. This strategy should be submitted to the Finance Committee for comment no later than December 31, 2026.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
May 12, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send Resolution, Document Number 2025-194 to the full Council with recommendation the resolution be adopted: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Smith. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Smith, Clark)

Final Council action · Aug 6, 202512 yes · 0 no

Final action on 2025-194: Require City Administrator to develop Citywide Asset Management Strategy to establish priorities and practices to address asset management maturity and financial planning gaps

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · May 12, 20255 yes

Motion to send Resolution, Document Number 2025-194 to the full Council with recommendation the resolution be adopted: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Smith. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Smith, Clark)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:12 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:31 AM PDT
Evidence hash
35b5bf8e2f0ce1be
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Adopted

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Adopted

  4. Council Action

    Rescheduled

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council