Decisions/2025-088
Emergency ordinance2025-088

Should Portland authorize City Administrator to negotiate and execute a lease for District 3 Council office space for an estimated total cost of $63,000?

The Councilors representing District 3 have concluded that the Southeast Uplift (SE Uplift) Neighborhood Coalition space satisfies their joint interest in and need for an in-district Office. This Ordinance authorizes the City Administrator through BFF to negotiate and execute a lease agreement for the SE Uplift space on behalf of the District 3 Councilors, who will jointly share the space, and all costs associated with its lease, improvement, occupancy, and eventual departure.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

*Authorize City Administrator to negotiate and execute a lease for District 3 Council office space for an estimated total cost of $63,000

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The Councilors representing District 3 have concluded that the Southeast Uplift (SE Uplift) Neighborhood Coalition space satisfies their joint interest in and need for an in-district Office. This Ordinance authorizes the City Administrator through BFF to negotiate and execute a lease agreement for the SE Uplift space on behalf of the District 3 Councilors, who will jointly share the space, and all costs associated with its lease, improvement, occupancy, and eventual departure.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The Office selected by the District 3 Councilors is zoned for the intended use. The location is near the center of District 3 and is easily accessible to the District 3 community by public transit, automobile, bicycle, and walking.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The annual cost of the leasing the building is representative of market rates and includes all operating expenses. The annual cost is within the District 3 Councilors’ existing and forecasted operating budgets. The lease will be administered and paid for through BFF’s Facilities Services Division budget. Each of the District 3 Councilors, who will be tenants, will be billed equally for actual costs incurred, plus a property management fee, via their interagency agreements with BFF’s Facilities Services Division. These agreements will be amended to reflect the costs of the lease in FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26.Although not covered by this Ordinance, one-time costs can and should be anticipated for minor improvements to the space and furnishings, and for the City’s eventual departure from the site; these costs have been estimated and are within the District 3 Councilors’ FY 2024-25 and forecasted budgets. Although not covered by this Ordinance, additional non-facility-related costs may result from this lease, such as ad hoc on-site technology and security support. These costs will be based on the District 3 Councilors’ demand for these services and thus cannot be presently known or evaluated for their budgetary impacts.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionEmergency ordinance 192027

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:Resolution No. 37638, adopted November 29, 2023, provided direction from Council to the Office of Management and Finance’s (OMF) Division of Asset Management, the predecessor of Bureau of Fleet and Facilities (BFF), to undertake planning to identify and onboard in-district offices (Offices) to accommodate new City Council activities within the four respective City Council districts and to provide updates to Council. Resolution No. 37668, adopted July 3, 2024, amended Resolution No. 37638 to remove the requirement for BFF to identify and onboard these Offices by January 1, 2025, due to BFF’s concerns about design program uncertainty, costs, and the speculative nature of the overall effort absent the input and approval of Councilors who would be the users of the spaces. Resolution No. 37668 did not preclude BFF from re-initiating the identification and development of Offices if requested by a future Council, nor did it require BFF to identify and develop Offices absent a future Council directive to do so. With the full Council elected and seated on January 1, 2025, BFF consulted with the Councilors regarding Office space in their districts. Collectively, District 3 Councilors identified the space located at 3534 SE Main Street (SE Uplift) as being optimal for their program and their community’s needs. The landlord of the SE Uplift space is willing to lease this space to the City at commercially reasonable rental rates and terms for a period of twenty-one (21) months, beginning April 1, 2025, with options to renew. This proposed lease will have no annual lease rate or cost escalations for the duration of the lease term, although any option to renew past this original term could include a rental rate or other cost escalation, as determined by the landlord. On or about October 19, 2005, prior Council passed Ordinance 179682, which directed the adoption of an administrative policy to maximize the City investment in City owned facilities, when these facilities reasonably meet the business needs of the bureau. The ordinance was later filed in the Portland Policy Document Repository as ADM 13.01. The former Chief Administrative Officer of the dissolved OMF was directed to determine the appropriateness of entering into out-leases for City operations and to obtain administrative approval from Council before exercising administrative contract authority of leases with the City as the tenant (out-leases). The City Administrator succeeded to the Chief Administrative Officer’s responsibility and BFF has OMF’s lease management functions. BFF assessed the needs of the District 3 Councilors against the available space within City-owned facilities in District 3 and concluded that there are no viable City-owned facilities options to meet the District 3 Councilors’ needs and goals within District 3. As it is more streamlined to execute one lease versus three, and as the SE Uplift facility includes certain fixed resources that will be shared equally by all three District 3 Councilors, the SE Uplift lease will be executed with, administered, and paid for through the budget resources of BFF’s Facilities Services Division, on behalf of all three District 3 Councilors. Each of the District 3 Councilors will be billed equally for any actual costs incurred by the SE Uplift lease agreement, including a small property management fee that covers the cost of BFF’s property management team, which oversees activities such as lease negotiations and invoice payments. Recovery of all of BFF’s lease and lease-management related costs need to comply with City Financial Policy 2.08.04. Thus, the District 3 Councilors’ FY 2024-25 Interagency Agreements with BFF – Facilities Services will be amended to reflect the anticipated signing of the SE Uplift lease on April 1, 2025, and future Interagency Agreements will similarly reflect this lease agreement. The financial impact of the SE Uplift lease for the remainder of FY 2024-25 year is estimated at $9,000 for rent, plus a BFF property management fee of $525. Capacity exists within the respective FY 2024-25 Council budgets to absorb these expenses. The financial impact in FY 2025-26 is estimated at $36,000 for rent, plus a BFF property management fee of $3,156, with the costs anticipated to be paid from the District 3 Councilors’ respective FY 2025-26 annual budgets, again split evenly. As this lease terminates on December 31, 2026, which is halfway through FY 2026-27, the financial impact in FY 2026-27 is estimated at $18,000 for rent, plus a BFF property management fee that will be based on BFF’s FY 2026-27 property management rates, which are not yet known. These costs will be paid from the District 3 Councilors’ respective FY 2026-27 annual budgets, split evenly. The decision to renew the lease will be made with the District 3 Councilors who may be elected on November 3, 2026. If renewed, the lease terms and costs may change, as determined by the landlord, as may the split of costs between the District 3 Councilors, as determined by the future Councilors. In the event any District 3 Councilor elects to vacate the leased premise during the term of the original twenty-one month lease, the remaining District 3 Councilors agree to negotiate and cover all remaining lease costs as they see fit. However, in no instance will any lease costs go unpaid or require subsidy by BFF or another City bureau, unless that bureau has formally agreed to a sublease that matches the terms of this Ordinance and covers in full the costs of the original lease. In addition to lease-related costs, District 3 Councilors agree to pay in full all costs associated with improving, occupying, and departing SE Uplift, with no subsidy of these costs funded in the budgets of BFF or another City bureau. In accordance with the ordinance, the City Administrator may assist District 3 Councilors, and execute appropriate leasing documents with landlord SE Uplift, or another suitable landlord, pursuant to the City Administrator’s administrative authority under City Charter, City Code and policies. The City Administrator is the Mayor’s delegee for Charter Section 2-401(j).NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The City Administrator or delegee is authorized to negotiate and execute out-lease for District 3 Councilors. All documents must be legally reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney prior to execution.District 3 Councilors may enter into administrative Interagency Agreement(s) with the City Administrator through BFF for the appropriate fiscal years for purpose of cost reimbursement for the lease and lease management.Cost reimbursement for subsequent fiscal years as outlined in the ordinance and proposed out-lease will be contingent upon approval of future budget appropriation in those subsequent fiscal years.Section 2. The Council declares that an emergency exists in order that this out-lease and funding may occur without delay; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 1 votes
Final Council action · Mar 19, 202512 yes · 0 no

Final action on 2025-088: *Authorize City Administrator to negotiate and execute a lease for District 3 Council office space for an estimated total cost of $63,000

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:16 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 14, 2026, 2:25 AM PDT
Evidence hash
49b566fe0f818ca1
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed