Pipeline/2025-186
Ordinance Enacted 192093

Amend Council Organization and Procedure Code to include Council rule on tie-breaking (amend Code Section 3.02.030)

Final ActionMateriality · Tier CReadiness · Ready With Caveats
Official record
What is being decided?

Amend Council Organization and Procedure Code to include Council rule on tie-breaking (amend Code Section 3.02.030)

What happens next?

Derived from official scheduling fields

Where has it appeared?

5 Council session appearances; latest Sep 3, 2025.

Decision standard · Rules v1

Decision readiness

Ready With Caveats

This measures whether decision-relevant information is visible. It does not measure whether the proposal deserves approval.

Decision definition

The requested action could not be determined.

Unknown
Legal instrument

Official text was found in the reviewed record.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

Funding information appears in the impact statement; inspect the source for precision.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Implementation

Implementation language appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Alternative

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Assumption

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Risk

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Dependency

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Evidence

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Information Request

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Outcome Measure

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Official material

Documents

0 linked files
Official page textRead

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:Portland City Code does not address Council vote tie-breaking by the Mayor; andPortland City Charter Section 2-401(e) provides that the Mayor has the responsibility to “[v]ote on matters before the Council in case of a tie, when the Mayor casts the deciding vote;” andSome matters before Council resulting in a tie vote should be left to the Council to resolve without initiating Charter Section 2-401(e); andThe Mayor cannot anticipate when they may be needed to break a tie causing Council action to be deferred; andPortland City Charter Section 2-111 authorizes Council to determine its own rules of procedure, which would include procedures relating to the Mayor's tie-breaking vote; andThe City Code must be amended to explicitly detail voting procedures as they relate to tie-breaking.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Amend City Code Section 3.02.030 as shown in Exhibit A.

Meeting-specific record

Motions, amendments & votes

9 vote records
AmendmentPassed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (11): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark) Passed to second reading as amended September 3, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

AmendmentFailed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (Novick, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan); Absent (2): Clark, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

AmendmentContinued

Motion to amend Exhibit A, to replace Subsection J.2 with "If the Mayor is unavailable either in person or virtually to cast the tiebreaking vote on final passage during the meeting, the result of the tied vote is deemed inconclusive. If the vote on final passage remains inconclusive at the end of the meeting, the matter will be automatically postponed and rescheduled to the next Council meeting for the sole purpose of the Mayor casting their vote. If the Mayor is not present, it would be considered a no vote as in J.3.": Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Novick. (Aye (7): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (3): Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney); Absent (2): Clark, Dunphy)

AmendmentFailed

Motion to amend Exhibit A to restore "resolutions, reports" to Subsection J.1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (4): Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (2): Clark, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading as amended August 6, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Amendment

Motion to amend Exhibit A, Code Subsection 3.02.030 J.1. to strike resolutions and reports: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy, Koyama Lane; Nay (1): Clark)

Amendment

Motion to amend Exhibit A, Code Subsection 3.02.030 J.2. to strike everything after the first sentence and amend first sentence to strike “result of the tied vote is deemed inconclusive” and add “vote fails”: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Dunphy; Nay (1): Koyama Lane)

MainWithdrawn

Motion to define a tie vote as receiving specifically six affirmative votes on final passage: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Dunphy. Motion withdrawn.

Amendment

Motion to amend Exhibit A, to add Code Subsection 3.02.030 J.3. In determining if a vote is a tie, absences, abstentions and vacancies will be counted as no votes: Moved by Koyama Lane and seconded by Clark. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Dunphy, Koyama Lane)

MainPassed

Motion to send Ordinance as amended, Document Number 2025-186, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Dunphy, Koyama Lane)

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (11): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark) Passed to second reading as amended September 3, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Passed11 yes · 1 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A, to replace Subsection J.2 with "If the Mayor is unavailable either in person or virtually to cast the tiebreaking vote on final passage during the meeting, the result of the tied vote is deemed inconclusive. If the vote on final passage remains inconclusive at the end of the meeting, the matter will be automatically postponed and rescheduled to the next Council meeting for the sole purpose of the Mayor casting their vote. If the Mayor is not present, it would be consid

Continued7 yes · 3 no · 2 absent

Motion to amend Exhibit A to restore "resolutions, reports" to Subsection J.1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (4): Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (2): Clark, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading as amended August 6, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Failed6 yes · 4 no · 2 absent
Official impact statement

Money & effects

Purpose & background

Update City Code rules for City Council in 2025.

Economic & real estate impacts

Not applicable.

Community impacts

These changes will facilitate City Council rules.

Financial & budgetary impacts

These City Code changes do not implement changes to current FTE or budgets and do not result in new financial obligations.

100% renewable goal

This legislation does not have an impact on the City’s renewable energy goals.

Follow-through

Implementation & accountability

Responsible organization

The reviewed source does not identify a responsible City organization.

Binding direction

The Council finds:Portland City Code does not address Council vote tie-breaking by the Mayor; andPortland City Charter Section 2-401(e) provides that the Mayor has the responsibility to “[v]ote on matters before the Council in case of a tie, when the Mayor casts the deciding vote;” andSome matters before Council resulting in a tie vote should be left to the Council to resolve without initiating Charter Section 2-401(e); andThe Mayor cannot anticipate when they may be needed to break a tie causing Council action to be deferred; andPortland City Charter Section 2-111 authorizes Council to determine its own rules of procedure, which would include procedures relating to the Mayor's tie-breaking vote; andThe City Code must be amended to explicitly detail voting procedures as they relate to tie-breaking.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Amend City Code Section 3.02.030 as shown in Exhibit A.

Mayor · Pending
Append-only history

Timeline

  1. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  2. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  3. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  5. Council Action

    Rescheduled

  6. Council Action

    Referred to City Council as amended