Decisions/2025-365
Ordinance2025-365

Should Portland establish a charge to fund City payment of the Flood Safety Benefit Fee to the Urban Flood Safety and Water Quality District?

The proposed ordinance establishes a new fee, administered via the water/sewer bill, to address the Flood Safety Benefit (FSB) fee charged to the City by the Urban Flood Safety Water Quality District (UFSWQD) pursuant to ORS Chapter 550.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Establish a charge to fund City payment of the Flood Safety Benefit Fee to the Urban Flood Safety and Water Quality District

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The proposed ordinance establishes a new fee, administered via the water/sewer bill, to address the Flood Safety Benefit (FSB) fee charged to the City by the Urban Flood Safety Water Quality District (UFSWQD) pursuant to ORS Chapter 550.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

In alignment with the budget note included in the FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget and FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget, this fee will be assessed and collected using the utility bill, though it is not in itself a utility fee. Pending Council adoption, the City will undertake a coordinated, inclusive effort to inform and educate customers, ensuring that outreach involves community partners and reflects the diversity of Portland’s communities.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

There are no budgetary impacts in FY 2025-26 as result of this ordinance. The FY 2026-27 budget will include collection of this fee, along with the administrative allocation to the Portland Water Bureau (including an annual administrative cost estimated at approximately 12% of collected revenue, plus a one-time charge of approximately $600,000 in FY 2026-27 for reimbursement of initial implementation costs).Consistent with a budget note in the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget, the General Fund forecast assumes that a new funding mechanism will be developed that removes the FSB fee funding burden from the General Fund. If the ordinance is not approved, the cost of this fee would remain with the General Fund, resulting in an increase to expenditures in the General Fund forecast and requiring a future decision about General Fund expenditure trade-offs. Approval of this fee will add an estimated $1.20 monthly to the typical single-family residential water, sewer, and stormwater bill. Eligible low-income customers will receive a discount in alignment with the discount rate on water, sewer, and stormwater charges. Impacts to multi-family will vary based on the number of dwelling units. Non-residential customers will be charged as a percentage of their bill, helping to scale the fee based on usage and system impact.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192113

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The Oregon Legislature created the Urban Flood Safety and Water Quality District (UFSWQD) in 2019 through Senate Bill 431, now codified in Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 550, to manage the levees, dikes, and other infrastructure that protect Portland and the surrounding communities from Columbia River flooding.In 2024, the Legislature, through Senate Bill 1517, gave the UFSWQD the authority to impose fees on local governments “to compensate the district for the overall fixed costs of operating the district and operating and maintaining district works that are not compensated for by the annual charge . . .”Beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 and annually thereafter, the UFSWQD assesses an annual flood safety benefit (FSB) fee to the City.In 2023, a workgroup consisting of multiple City bureaus and stakeholders examined multiple potential funding options. In response to a budget note in the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget, the Chief Financial Officer recommended that the FSB fee initially be paid from the General Fund because of the broad benefit afforded by the UFSWQD’s infrastructure management. That recommendation also suggested that alternative funding options continue to be explored. In FY 2024-25, the City paid the FSB fee from its General Fund and it will do the same for FY 2025-26, during which the fee is estimated to total approximately $5.3 million.The FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget included a budget note identifying “an expectation that a fee will be incorporated into the City utility bill in an amount sufficient to cover the FSB fee on an ongoing basis beginning in FY 2026-27" and directing the Chief Financial Officer to convene a workgroup to “identify a recommended customer allocation methodology and implementation plan for consideration by the Finance Committee and/or City Council no later than October 15, 2025, in advance of FY 2026-27 budget development.”The workgroup convened by the Chief Financial Officer at Council direction assessed multiple potential cost allocation methodologies and collection strategies and recommended that, beginning with FY 2026-27, the City’s payment of the fee should be reimbursed to the City through a new charge on the unified water/sewer bill, thus utilizing an existing billing system. The fee should not, however, be considered or used as a utility fee.The workgroup further recommended that, upon collection of the fee, funds be deposited into the General Fund.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The UFSWQD reimbursement fee is created and will be assessed by the Portland Water Bureau on the water, sewer, and stormwater bill according to the methodology described in Exhibit A.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 3 votes

Recorded amendments

Oct 1, 2025 · Passed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Green. (Aye (11): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Clark) Passed to second reading as amended October 8, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Read all 2 exact motions
Oct 1, 2025 · Amendment · Passed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Green. (Aye (11): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Clark) Passed to second reading as amended October 8, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Sep 22, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-365, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Green and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney (Aye (4): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney, Zimmerman; Absent (1): Novick)

Final Council action · Oct 8, 202510 yes · 0 no · 2 absent

Final action on 2025-365: Establish a charge to fund City payment of the Flood Safety Benefit Fee to the Urban Flood Safety and Water Quality District

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 1, 202511 yes · 1 absent

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Green. (Aye (11): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Clark) Passed to second reading as amended October 8, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 22, 20254 yes · 1 absent

Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-365, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Green and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney (Aye (4): Green, Avalos, Pirtle-Guiney, Zimmerman; Absent (1): Novick)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:10 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:29 AM PDT
Evidence hash
9ee672e0f7269bbd
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council