Pipeline/2026-203
Resolution Enacted 37749

Direct the City Administrator to reestablish a Permitting Improvement Team to lead the second phase of the Code Alignment Project

Final ActionMateriality · Tier DReadiness · Ready With Caveats
Official record
What is being decided?

Direct the City Administrator to reestablish a Permitting Improvement Team to lead the second phase of the Code Alignment Project

What happens next?

Derived from official scheduling fields

Where has it appeared?

2 Council session appearances; latest Jul 16, 2026.

Decision standard · Rules v1

Decision readiness

Ready With Caveats

This measures whether decision-relevant information is visible. It does not measure whether the proposal deserves approval.

Decision definition

The requested action could not be determined.

Unknown
Legal instrument

Official text was found in the reviewed record.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

Funding information appears in the impact statement; inspect the source for precision.

Complete
Supporting documents

3 linked supporting documents found.

Complete
Implementation

Implementation language appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Alternative

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Assumption

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Risk

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Dependency

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Evidence
  • In 2021, the City Council established the Permit Improvement Task Force to address longstanding permitting challenges identified in the Building Permit Review Audit.
Information Request

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Outcome Measure

Not found in the reviewed official text.

Official material

Documents

3 linked files
Official page textRead

WHEREAS, in 1997, the Auditor recommended that the City establish a single development bureau to fix the "lack of central leadership and organizational accountability" stemming from problems with inter-bureau coordination; andWHEREAS, in 2021, former Commissioners Dan Ryan and Mingus Mapps convened the Permitting Improvement Task Force in response to the Building Permit Review Audit to address permitting delays and inefficiencies, which recommended creation of the Code Alignment Project to simplify development-related codes, policies, and processes to make permitting is more accessible and efficient for customers; andWHEREAS, in response to City Auditor reports from 1997, 2003, 2005, and 2021, Council passed Resolution 37628 directing the creation of a "cohesive system" for improved permitting service delivery by requesting the consolidation of development review and permitting staff into one entity authorized to manage development review and permitting decisions by July 1, 2024; andWHEREAS, Council's adoption of Ordinance 191736 on May 29, 2024, pursuant to Resolution 37628, established Portland Permitting & Development (PP&D) as that unified permitting authority as a foundational start towards efficiency noting that "redefining roles and responsibilities" is a complex task that would require "a longer-term work plan to amend and restructure systematically the Code and rules to reflect this new relationship"; andWHEREAS, on September 24, 2025, Council unanimously adopted the first Code Alignment Project package to temporarily suspend or modify a limited number of regulatory requirements across Titles 11, 17, 24, and 33, effective October 24, 2025 through January 1, 2029, in order to reduce permitting delays, support economic recovery, and evaluate longer-term code reforms; andWHEREAS, the Code Alignment Project team has identified additional complex problems, including inconsistent requirements between the Code and administrative rules, inter-bureau process inefficiencies, and unclear code precedence that the team could not address in the first project package due to staff capacity constraints and the lack of cross-bureau authority required to resolve them; andWHEREAS, if left unresolved, these problems will continue to hinder the City's ability to meet its development goals and streamlining efforts resulting in increased project costs, resubmittal delays, lost City revenue, and further erosion of Portland's reputation as a city worth investing in.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council urges the City Administrator to reestablish a Permitting Improvement Team within the Community and Economic Development Service Area to lead, in collaboration with Council, the second phase of the Code Alignment Project (CAP 2) to consolidate fragmented permitting authority, resolve code and regulatory conflicts, and create lasting improvements to the permitting experience for staff and the public.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator must ensure all impacted service areas and bureaus, including but not limited to Parks, Fire and Rescue, the Housing Bureau, the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, and Public Works, cooperate urgently with the Permitting Improvement Team to resolve identified barriers to permit approvals and delays in the plan review and resubmittal processes. The City Administrator must further ensure these bureaus and service areas implement simplified, standardized practices recommended by the team that improve efficiency while maintaining essential safety and planning standards.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Deputy City Administrators of Community and Economic Development, Public Works and Public Safety, will assign staff from bureaus that directly engage in permitting and development code functions to the Code and Policy Coordination Group to reduce regulatory burden and inefficiencies in code development.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator must ensure that improvements to administrative rules, procedures and City Code, made in collaboration with Council, are targeted to encourage economic development and include but are not limited to:Adaptive reuse of commercial buildings;Outdated or onerous threshold values;Non-conforming use requirements;Change of use and occupancy requirements;Seismic upgrade thresholds and requirements;Parking restrictions;Permitting fees;Right-of-way and utility coordination;Tree code requirements; andZoning code provisions, including the development of amendments where necessary to resolve code conflicts and amendments that facilitate more expedient and less costly review processes.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator, pursuant to Code 3.06.010, must ensure the Permitting Improvement Team is authorized to:Serve as the coordinating lead across all impacted City bureaus and service areas, responsible for setting project timelines and directing the implementation of a unified permitting alignment initiative; andResolve bureau conflicts and advance code amendments, procedural improvements, and administrative rule changes within the project scope; andConvene an advisory body comprised of external stakeholders with relevant construction or design experience and familiarity with City development codes and permitting systems to provide guidance to the team. This body should incorporate input from customers and the Development Review Advisory Committee to the code and policy changes towards simple, clear requirements and widely accepted best practices; andPrepare code amendment packages, as necessary, for Council consideration and approval.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that within 60 days of adoption of this Resolution, the City Administrator will provide Council with the following:A report outlining the scope of the first CAP 2 project package, including timeline and areas of focus; andA resource statement identifying staff, funding, reallocated positions, and any additional funding needed to meaningfully improve all named areas of CAP 2 focus within 2 years; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that within 150 days of adoption of this Resolution, the City Administrator will provide Council with the following:A proposal with supporting work plan that includes:A permanent code team solely responsible for drafting and maintaining all development-related codes and administrative rules, ensuring consistency with regional and national standards and responsiveness to customer and staff feedback;A framework for the centralization of development review and permitting authority within a single entity, including authority to set and administer fees, enforce timelines, resolve conflicts, direct staff and process improvements regardless of where staff are housed, and establish customer service standards, ensuring a single point of accountability for systemwide performance;Identifying dedicated staff and resources needed for maximum centralization and streamlining of development processes, including an inventory of existing related positions across City bureaus and a funding strategy that addresses gaps and ensures full cost recovery;An assessment of the benefits and current obstacles of fully centralizing all development review and permitting processes within a single entity; andA list of City Code titles and sections that would require amendment to implement this proposal, with draft Code language as appropriate.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator must report to Council no less than once per quarter on the progress of CAP 2 improvements, and that any additional code change packages will be brought forward for Council consideration on an ongoing and iterative basis.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution is binding City policy.

Meeting-specific record

Motions, amendments & votes

2 vote records
MainPassed

Motion to refer the Resolution, Document Number 2026-203, to City Council with the recommendation it be adopted: Moved by Novick and seconded by Green. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Avalos)

Official impact statement

Money & effects

Purpose & background

This resolution builds on previous City efforts to consolidate permitting authority and align codes and processes, creating a sustained mechanism to permanently resolve complex regulatory and procedural barriers to permitting. In 2021, the City Council established the Permit Improvement Task Force to address longstanding permitting challenges identified in the Building Permit Review Audit. From that work, Portland Permitting & Development (PP&D) and the Code Alignment Project were conceived as complementary reforms: PP&D to consolidate permitting functions and establish a lead entity for development review, and the Code Alignment Project to identify and resolve the complex regulatory, procedural, and inter-bureau conflicts that continue to create permitting barriers.The first phase of the Code Alignment Project (CAP 1) piloted targeted code changes, including the temporary suspension of certain required upgrades, to reduce permitting complexity while maintaining core public safety objectives. However, significant work remains unfinished, and the team's ability to implement holistic permitting improvements continues to be constrained by limited authority over development regulations outside of PP&D's and the Community and Economic Development Service Area's (CEDSA) purview.Therefore, this resolution urges the City Administrator to empower the Permitting Improvement Team to lead the second phase of the Code Alignment Project (CAP 2) to address these remaining structural and regulatory barriers. It further requires the City Administrator to report to Council on priorities, timelines, and resource needs, develop recommendations for a permanent team responsible for development-related codes and administrative rules, and establish a framework for more centralized permitting authority with a balanced funding strategy. Consistent collaboration with Council will ensure public accountability and oversight throughout implementation.

Economic & real estate impacts

By directing the consolidation of permitting functions and resolution of longstanding code conflicts under a single coordinating authority, this resolution is expected to have a positive impact on Portland's real estate and economic development activity. Permitting delays and regulatory inconsistencies have historically increased project costs, deterred private investment, and slowed housing and commercial development. The Code Alignment Project's second phase will directly address key barriers, including but not limited to:Adaptive reuse of commercial buildingsParking and zoning code conflictsChange of use and seismic requirementsRight-of-way and utility coordinationOutdated fee structures and threshold valuesNon-conforming use requirementsTree code requirementsResolving these barriers and creating a simplified mechanism for ongoing review and continual improvement is expected to accelerate project timelines, increase City permit revenue, attract new investment, and support job creation in the construction and development sectors.

Community impacts

Portland's development community, advocacy organizations, and the public have made clear that the current permitting system is not working. Since 1997, the City Auditor has issued repeated findings showing little to no improvement in customer experience, inter-bureau accountability, or timely service delivery.The first phase of the Code Alignment Project demonstrated both the value and the limits of incremental reform. Outreach to developers, architects, engineers, minority contractors, and disability and environmental advocates revealed meaningful support for reducing regulatory barriers, but also made clear that the problems run deeper than any single code amendment can fix. This resolution responds to those problems with a directive for action grounded in years of community feedback and direct constituent experience. It explicitly calls for the formation of an advisory body comprised of individuals with hands-on construction and design experience to guide code changes toward simplicity and widely accepted best practices.It also directs the City Administrator to propose a permanent Code Writing Team and a framework for measuring permitting performance against customer service and quality standards, ensuring that future code and process changes are always informed by real-time feedback from implementation teams as issues arise. The purpose of this effort is to build a permitting and regulatory system that is simpler, faster, and more responsive to the needs of applicants so the City meets its goals of increasing economic development opportunities and housing availability for Portland communities.

Financial & budgetary impacts

Within 60 days of adoption, the City Administrator must provide Council with a resource statement identifying current staff, funding, reallocated positions, and any additional funding needed to meaningfully improve all named areas of focus within 2 years. Within 150 days, the City Administrator must provide a preliminary funding strategy that addresses resource gaps and ensures full cost recovery, along with an inventory of existing permitting and development-related positions across all City bureaus. If it is determined that additional positions or resources are needed, those requests would be made as part of the FY 2026-27 Fall TAO, the FY 2027-28 budget, or subsequent fiscal year budgets. If updated Inter-bureau agreements or aforementioned funding requests are needed to support personnel consolidating under a centralized structure, these must be made clear to Council before any changes having a budgetary impact are confirmed.

100% renewable goal

Not applicable.

Follow-through

Implementation & accountability

Responsible organization

Permitting & DevelopmentPlanning and Sustainability (BPS)Transportation PermittingTree Permits and RegulationsWater Development Services

Binding direction

This resolution responds to those problems with a directive for action grounded in years of community feedback and direct constituent experience.

Permitting & DevelopmentPlanning and Sustainability (BPS)Transportation PermittingTree Permits and RegulationsWater Development Services · Observed
Binding direction

It explicitly calls for the formation of an advisory body comprised of individuals with hands-on construction and design experience to guide code changes toward simplicity and widely accepted best practices.It also directs the City Administrator to propose a permanent Code Writing Team and a framework for measuring permitting performance against customer service and quality standards, ensuring that future code and process changes are always informed by real-time feedback from implementation teams as issues arise.

Permitting & DevelopmentPlanning and Sustainability (BPS)Transportation PermittingTree Permits and RegulationsWater Development Services · Observed
Binding direction

Within 60 days of adoption, the City Administrator must provide Council with a resource statement identifying current staff, funding, reallocated positions, and any additional funding needed to meaningfully improve all named areas of focus within 2 years.

Permitting & DevelopmentPlanning and Sustainability (BPS)Transportation PermittingTree Permits and RegulationsWater Development Services · Observed
Binding direction

Within 150 days, the City Administrator must provide a preliminary funding strategy that addresses resource gaps and ensures full cost recovery, along with an inventory of existing permitting and development-related positions across all City bureaus.

Permitting & DevelopmentPlanning and Sustainability (BPS)Transportation PermittingTree Permits and RegulationsWater Development Services · Observed
Binding direction

If updated Inter-bureau agreements or aforementioned funding requests are needed to support personnel consolidating under a centralized structure, these must be made clear to Council before any changes having a budgetary impact are confirmed.

Permitting & DevelopmentPlanning and Sustainability (BPS)Transportation PermittingTree Permits and RegulationsWater Development Services · Observed
Append-only history

Timeline

  1. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  2. Council Action

    Adopted

  3. Council Action

    Referred to City Council