Decisions/2026-055
Ordinance2026-055

Should Portland amend Campaign Finance Code to maintain enforcement of voter-approved regulations following court order (amend Code Chapter 2.10)?

Charter Section 3-305, which is further implemented in Code Chapter 2.10, empowers the City Auditor's Office to enforce campaign finance regulations contained in City Charter Chapter 3, Article 3 (Campaign Finance in Candidate Elections).On July 31, 2025, the Multnomah County Circuit Court determined that the enforcement procedures in Charter Section 3-305 (and by extension, in Code Chapter 2.10) are unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution because they do not include adequate procedural protections for those who are subject to campaign finance regulations. The court identified two primary concerns: the lack of a hearing, and, relatedly, the abbreviated investigation timeline. Because of this ruling, the Auditor cannot implement the campaign finance enforcement procedures in Charter Section 3-305 and Code Chapter 2.10.This non-emergency ordinance adds procedures necessary to restore constitutional due process and permit the Auditor to enforce the City's campaign finance regulations. This ordinance amends Code Chapter 2.10 to:Add the opportunity to request and receive a hearing to review the City's proposed decisions under City Charter Chapter 3, Article 3 (Campaign Finance in Candidate Elections).Change noticing and investigatory timelines to ensure parties have meaningful opportunities to respond to, and participate in, enforcement procedures by:Eliminating the halving of noticing and enforcement timelines when a complaint is received within 30 days of an election;Adding twelve (12) calendar days to notice timelines (the period between when a complaint is received and the subject of the complaint is notified), to allow Elections time to conduct a sufficiency review and prepare for investigations;Granting Elections discretion to extend notice and enforcement timelines for good cause, to be defined by administrative rule. Allow the City Auditor to make rules necessary to carry out its enforcement duties.This ordinance does not impact the administration of the Small Donor Elections program or its enforcement procedures, which are outlined in Code Chapter 2.16 and Administrative Rule.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Amend Campaign Finance Code to maintain enforcement of voter-approved regulations following court order (amend Code Chapter 2.10)

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

Charter Section 3-305, which is further implemented in Code Chapter 2.10, empowers the City Auditor's Office to enforce campaign finance regulations contained in City Charter Chapter 3, Article 3 (Campaign Finance in Candidate Elections).On July 31, 2025, the Multnomah County Circuit Court determined that the enforcement procedures in Charter Section 3-305 (and by extension, in Code Chapter 2.10) are unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution because they do not include adequate procedural protections for those who are subject to campaign finance regulations. The court identified two primary concerns: the lack of a hearing, and, relatedly, the abbreviated investigation timeline. Because of this ruling, the Auditor cannot implement the campaign finance enforcement procedures in Charter Section 3-305 and Code Chapter 2.10.This non-emergency ordinance adds procedures necessary to restore constitutional due process and permit the Auditor to enforce the City's campaign finance regulations. This ordinance amends Code Chapter 2.10 to:Add the opportunity to request and receive a hearing to review the City's proposed decisions under City Charter Chapter 3, Article 3 (Campaign Finance in Candidate Elections).Change noticing and investigatory timelines to ensure parties have meaningful opportunities to respond to, and participate in, enforcement procedures by:Eliminating the halving of noticing and enforcement timelines when a complaint is received within 30 days of an election;Adding twelve (12) calendar days to notice timelines (the period between when a complaint is received and the subject of the complaint is notified), to allow Elections time to conduct a sufficiency review and prepare for investigations;Granting Elections discretion to extend notice and enforcement timelines for good cause, to be defined by administrative rule. Allow the City Auditor to make rules necessary to carry out its enforcement duties.This ordinance does not impact the administration of the Small Donor Elections program or its enforcement procedures, which are outlined in Code Chapter 2.16 and Administrative Rule.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

This legislation allows for constitutional enforcement of City campaign finance laws. Outside of providing required due process procedures for all parties in a complaint, there are no other direct community impacts. If amendments are not adopted, Elections may be unable to enforce contribution limits and disclosure requirements, which were adopted by voters to promote transparency and reduce the impact of money on local elections.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This ordinance is expected to result in a new intergovernmental agreement with a state or local hearings office to provide independent hearings of City enforcement decisions related to campaign finance regulations. Based on historic levels of enforcement activity the amount is not expected to exceed $7,500 per fiscal year.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents2 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192156

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The City Council finds:On November 6, 2018, voters approved an initiative adding campaign finance regulation to the City Charter in the City's Municipal General Election. (2018 General Election Report to Council).Charter Section 3-305, which is further implemented in Code Chapter 2.10, empowers the City Auditor's Office to enforce campaign finance regulations.On July 31, 2025, the Multnomah County Circuit Court determined that the enforcement procedures in Charter Section 3-305 are unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution because they do not include adequate procedural protections for those who are subject to campaign finance regulations.The City is committed to upholding due process rights for members of the public who are subject to its campaign finance regulations.The City is committed to enforcing its campaign finance regulations promptly, accurately, and transparently.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Amend City Code Chapter 2.10 as shown in Exhibit A.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes5 meetings · 4 votes

Recorded amendments

Mar 11, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (9): Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Dunphy; Nay (3): Smith, Ryan, Zimmerman)

Mar 11, 2026 · Passed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (11): Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Dunphy; Nay (1): Smith) Passed to second reading as amended March 18, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.

Read all 3 exact motions
Mar 11, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (9): Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Dunphy; Nay (3): Smith, Ryan, Zimmerman)

Mar 11, 2026 · Amendment · Passed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (11): Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Dunphy; Nay (1): Smith) Passed to second reading as amended March 18, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.

Feb 9, 2026 · Main · Recorded

Motion to send Ordinance, Document Number 2026-055, to the full Council with a recommendation to pass: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Koyama Lane)

Final Council action · Mar 18, 202610 yes · 1 no · 1 absent

Final action on 2026-055: Amend Campaign Finance Code to maintain enforcement of voter-approved regulations following court order (amend Code Chapter 2.10)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Mar 11, 20269 yes · 3 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (9): Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Dunphy; Nay (3): Smith, Ryan, Zimmerman)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Mar 11, 202611 yes · 1 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (11): Avalos, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Dunphy; Nay (1): Smith) Passed to second reading as amended March 18, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Feb 9, 20265 yes

Motion to send Ordinance, Document Number 2026-055, to the full Council with a recommendation to pass: Moved by Clark and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Dunphy, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Clark, Koyama Lane)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

1 linked supporting document found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.

Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:06 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:25 AM PDT
Evidence hash
b35088bc8471a666
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  5. Council Action

    Rescheduled

  6. Council Action

    Continued

  7. Council Action

    Referred to City Council