The City of Portland is a party to an intergovernmental agreement with Multnomah County and the cities of Gresham, Fairview, Troutdale, and Wood Village, dated December 24, 1992, as modified by subsequent amendments, creating the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission (“MHCRC”) for the purposes of:Advocating for and protecting the public interest in the regulation and development of communications systems;Monitoring and helping resolve subscribers' concerns; andFacilitating the planning and implementation of community uses of communications technologies.The MHCRC contracts for staff and other support services through a separate services agreement with the City of Portland. The MHCRC funds an equivalent of 4.35 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff positions in the City’s Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, plus related materials, services, financial and administrative costs.The Intergovernmental Agreement (“IGA”) establishes the responsibilities and powers of the MHCRC, including the process for member jurisdictions’ approval of the MHCRC’s annual budget. Under the terms of the IGA:The MHCRC transmits its adopted fiscal year budget to the jurisdictions for approval; andEach jurisdiction annually contributes funding to the operations of the MHCRC as determined during the annual budget process through a cost allocation methodology.The MHCRC adopted the FY 2025-26 Fund Budget, FY 2025-26 Goals and Objectives (respectively document Exhibit A) at its May 19, 2025, Regular Meeting. About 35% of the MHCRC operating budget is funded by the jurisdictions’ allocations and the remaining by other MHCRC resources. The City of Portland cost allocation for the FY 2025-26 operating budget is $355,622, which is the MHCRC Special Appropriation amount contained in the City of Portland Council FY 2025-26 budget. The City’s cost allocation represents 65% of the total jurisdictional allocations to the budget with 35% provided by the East County jurisdictions.Nearly all the MHCRC’s resources are funds collected from the cable companies in the form of franchise fees from revenue earned within the MHCRC member jurisdiction areas and public benefit fees (referred to as “PEG/I-Net fees” in the franchise) county-wide. The expenditures are disbursements, governed by the IGA and restricted for certain purposes under the cable services franchise agreements, to:East County Jurisdictions (franchise fee balance);Community media providers (MetroEast Community Media for both operating and capital funds; and Open Signal for capital funds);Community Technology Grants to support nonprofits’, schools’, library’s, and local governments’ video production technology needsFor more detail on the MHCRC budget, see document Exhibit A: Proposed MHCRC FY 2025-26 Fund Budget.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland approve the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission FY 2025-26 Fund Budget?
The City of Portland is a party to an intergovernmental agreement with Multnomah County and the cities of Gresham, Fairview, Troutdale, and Wood Village, dated December 24, 1992, as modified by subsequent amendments, creating the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission (“MHCRC”) for the purposes of:Advocating for and protecting the public interest in the regulation and development of communications systems;Monitoring and helping resolve subscribers' concerns; andFacilitating the planning and implementation of community uses of communications technologies.The MHCRC contracts for staff and other support services through a separate services agreement with the City of Portland. The MHCRC funds an equivalent of 4.35 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff positions in the City’s Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, plus related materials, services, financial and administrative costs.The Intergovernmental Agreement (“IGA”) establishes the responsibilities and powers of the MHCRC, including the process for member jurisdictions’ approval of the MHCRC’s annual budget. Under the terms of the IGA:The MHCRC transmits its adopted fiscal year budget to the jurisdictions for approval; andEach jurisdiction annually contributes funding to the operations of the MHCRC as determined during the annual budget process through a cost allocation methodology.The MHCRC adopted the FY 2025-26 Fund Budget, FY 2025-26 Goals and Objectives (respectively document Exhibit A) at its May 19, 2025, Regular Meeting. About 35% of the MHCRC operating budget is funded by the jurisdictions’ allocations and the remaining by other MHCRC resources. The City of Portland cost allocation for the FY 2025-26 operating budget is $355,622, which is the MHCRC Special Appropriation amount contained in the City of Portland Council FY 2025-26 budget. The City’s cost allocation represents 65% of the total jurisdictional allocations to the budget with 35% provided by the East County jurisdictions.Nearly all the MHCRC’s resources are funds collected from the cable companies in the form of franchise fees from revenue earned within the MHCRC member jurisdiction areas and public benefit fees (referred to as “PEG/I-Net fees” in the franchise) county-wide. The expenditures are disbursements, governed by the IGA and restricted for certain purposes under the cable services franchise agreements, to:East County Jurisdictions (franchise fee balance);Community media providers (MetroEast Community Media for both operating and capital funds; and Open Signal for capital funds);Community Technology Grants to support nonprofits’, schools’, library’s, and local governments’ video production technology needsFor more detail on the MHCRC budget, see document Exhibit A: Proposed MHCRC FY 2025-26 Fund Budget.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
*Approve the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission FY 2025-26 Fund Budget
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns land use & permitting and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThe MHCRC has a Finance Committee, which developed the draft FY 2025-26 budget at their May 1 meeting, and the full MHCRC adopted the budget at its May 19, 2025, regular meeting. Each member jurisdiction considers budget approval at a city council or County Commission meeting.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 12–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2025-227: *Approve the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission FY 2025-26 Fund Budget
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
The City of Portland’s cost allocation to the MHCRC FY 2025-26 budget, as outlined in this ordinance, is included in the Council FY 2025-26 budget as a Special Appropriation. No additional resource is anticipated.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The City is a party to an intergovernmental agreement with Multnomah County and the cities of Gresham, Fairview, Troutdale, and Wood Village dated December 24, 1992, as modified by subsequent amendments, creating the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission (“Commission”). The Intergovernmental Agreement (the “IGA”) establishes the responsibilities and powers of the Commission, as delegated by the participating jurisdictions. The City Council approved the City of Portland’s participation in the Commission by Ordinance No. 166168, enacted on January 20, 1993.Under the terms of the IGA, after adopting its annual budget, the Commission transmits the budget to the jurisdictions. The Commission’s adopted budget becomes effective after approval by the jurisdictions.Under the terms of the IGA, each participating jurisdiction contributes funding to the operations of the Commission as determined during the annual budget process through a cost allocation methodology.The Commission adopted the FY 2025-26 Fund Budget at its May 19, 2025, Regular Meeting and has transmitted the adopted budget to the jurisdictions for approval.The City has appropriated sufficient funds in its approved FY 2025-26 budget for the City’s cost allocation identified in the Commission FY 2025-26 budget.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:As provided under the City’s intergovernmental agreement with Multnomah County and the cities of Gresham, Fairview, Troutdale, and Wood Village dated December 24, 1992, as modified by subsequent amendments, creating the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission, the City of Portland approves the Commission FY 2025-26 Fund Budget as attached as Exhibit A to this ordinance.The City’s Special Appropriation for the Commission FY 2025-26 Fund Budget is $355,622.Section 2. The Council declares an emergency exists because it is necessary to approve the budget without delay in order to provide authority to transact the financial affairs of the Commission for FY 2025-26; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-227, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Novick. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Green, Avalos, Zimmerman)
Final Council action · Jun 18, 202512 yes · 0 no
Final action on 2025-227: *Approve the Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission FY 2025-26 Fund Budget
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 9, 20255 yes
Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-227, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Novick. (Aye (5): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Green, Avalos, Zimmerman)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:13 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 14, 2026, 2:22 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- fea54e78f9e0d7be
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Passed
- Council Action
Referred to City Council