Decisions/2025-489
Emergency ordinance2025-489

Should Portland ratify a successor collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Local 189, for represented employees…

The purpose of this ordinance is to ratify a successor collective bargaining agreement with the American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Local 189 and the City of Portland for represented employees in the Office of Independent Police Review.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

*Ratify a successor collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Local 189, for represented employees within the Office of Independent Police Review for the terms and conditions of employment of represented employees in the Independent Police Review bargaining unit

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The purpose of this ordinance is to ratify a successor collective bargaining agreement with the American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Local 189 and the City of Portland for represented employees in the Office of Independent Police Review.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Final Council action

Passed · 10–1

Read the exact motion or vote question

Final action on 2025-489: *Ratify a successor collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Local 189, for represented employees within the Office of Independent Police Review for the terms and conditions of employment of represented employees in the Independent Police Review bargaining unit

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

The total new spending will not exceed $161,500. The actual cost will depend on the number of current employees who remain eligible for retention bonuses in each year of the contract.The total cost for FY 25-26 is up to $68,600. This includes a $4,500 retention bonuses for each current employee still employed in June 2026, as well as the associated wage-driven benefits.The total cost for FY 26-27 is up to $53,400. This includes a $3,500 retention bonuses for each current employee still employed in June 2027, as well as the associated wage-driven benefits.The total cost for FY 27-28 is up to $39,500. This includes a $2,500 retention bonuses for each current employee still employed in June 2028, as well as the associated wage-driven benefits.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionEmergency ordinance 192132

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The City and American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 189 are representing the employees within the Office of Independent Police Review (IPR) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement effective July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2025 (the 2022-2025 CBA).AFSCME Local 189 is the sole and exclusive bargaining agent for all classifications listed in Schedule A in the 2022-2025 CBA.On or about March 26th, 2025, pursuant to the City's obligations under ORS 243.650 representatives of the City entered into negotiations for a successor CBA with AFSCME Local 189.On November 20, 2025, representatives of the City and AFSCME Local 189 signed a Tentative Agreement (Agreement), Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, that outlines the terms and conditions of employment for employees covered by the AFSCME-IPR bargaining unit for the period of July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2028 (2025-2028 CBA).Employees in AFSCME-IPR will receive a two point four percent (2.4%) Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) retroactive to July 1, 2025 and cost of living increases effective July 1, 2026, and July 1, 2027, which will be tied to the CPI-W West - Size Class A with a minimum increase of one percent (1%) and a maximum increase of five percent (5%).To address retention within IPR and to ensure ongoing compliance with the settlement agreement between the City and the United States, the CBA provides for bargaining unit employees that are in service at the end of each year of the CBA to receive a bonus no greater than $4,500 in June 2026, and $3,500 in June 2027, and $2,500 in June 2028. Bargaining unit members will receive the full bonus if their IPR work transitions to the Office of Community-based Police Accountability (OCPA) before the end of a fiscal year.To further address retention concerns, the City has agreed that AFSCME-IPR represented employees are guaranteed interviews with the OCPA Director and offers of employment to successful candidates for related positions in the OCPA prior to interviewing other applicants outside of the bargaining unit. The City also guaranteed offers of substantially equivalent work outside of the OCPA for bargaining unit members who either do not apply to, or are not hired into, the OCPA. Bargaining unit members moving to either position will have no reduction in pay. Employees opting layoff will be eligible for administrative leave of 30 days prior to the effective layoff date.The additional, and complete terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be reduced to a successor collective bargaining agreement and shall substantially conform to Exhibit A (the 2025-2028 CBA).NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Agreement between the City and AFSCME Local 189 attached hereto as Exhibit A is ratified by this Council and the 2025-2028 CBA will be in a form substantially similar to Exhibit A.The City Administrator, the Director of the Bureau of Human Resources, and the City Auditor, with approval as to form by the City Attorney's Office, are authorized to execute the 2025-2028 successor CBA between the City and AFSCME Local 189.Section 2. The Council declares an emergency exists to avoid an unnecessary delay in the orderly implementation of the provisions of the successor CBA; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 1 votes
Final Council action · Dec 10, 202510 yes · 1 no · 1 absent

Final action on 2025-489: *Ratify a successor collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, Local 189, for represented employees within the Office of Independent Police Review for the terms and conditions of employment of represented employees in the Independent Police Review bargaining unit

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:08 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:27 AM PDT
Evidence hash
008fc3130ea6499c
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed