Decisions/2025-403
Ordinance2025-403

Should Portland adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes?

In the Fall Supplemental Budget (Technical Adjustment Ordinance or TAO), City Council adopts changes to appropriation levels in various funds and makes changes to Current Appropriation Level targets. Many programs and projects throughout the City are impacted by this action. The proposed legislation does not change any City policies.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes

This is one chapter of a larger storyCity budget and services

Which services can Portland sustain when recurring costs grow faster than recurring revenue?

Start with the full topic dossier
Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

In the Fall Supplemental Budget (Technical Adjustment Ordinance or TAO), City Council adopts changes to appropriation levels in various funds and makes changes to Current Appropriation Level targets. Many programs and projects throughout the City are impacted by this action. The proposed legislation does not change any City policies.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The public had the opportunity to provide online testimony for several weeks leading up to a publicly-noticed hearing, where community members may also provide virtual testimony. This supplemental budget is a part of a much larger budget process; the rest of the budget process is subject to extensive public outreach in the form of public meetings, public hearings, Council work sessions, requests, and analysis provided online and the inclusion of public budget advisors.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

Approval of the exhibits of this ordinance reflect appropriation changes in 48 funds by a net increase of $241.3 million, primarily resulting from truing up beginning fund balances and other resources between fiscal years. There is a net increase/decrease to General Fund contingency accounts. These changes are summarized in Exhibit 2. Additional details are available in Exhibit 7.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192123

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:Exhibit 1, attached, includes all incremental changes to the City appropriation schedule as a result of the Fall Supplemental Budget Process.A memorandum, attached as Exhibit 2, identifies programs, projects, or activities that require appropriation adjustments or transfer or appropriation within bureau and fund budgets.Exhibit 3, attached, shows, for informational purposes, a reconciliation of changes to all funds.Exhibit 4, attached, shows, for informational purposes, all requests materially affecting the General Fund.Exhibit 5, attached, shows all position changes.Exhibit 6, attached, shows all bureau decision package narrative with corresponding high-level financial information.Exhibit 7, attached, includes the Fall TAO memo published by the City Budget Office that explains changes of note.City financial policy FIN 2.03 dictates that "at least fifty-percent (50%) of General Fund discretionary revenue that exceeds budgeted beginning balance (adjusted for the difference in encumbrance carryovers and Council-authorized carryovers from the prior fiscal year) will be set aside during the Fall budget monitoring process for allocation to infrastructure maintenance or replacement in the subsequent budget process. This funding shall be allocated for projects relating to emergency preparedness, parks and recreation, and transportation." In FY 2025-26, there is a negative balance of General Fund discretionary after adjusting for budgeted beginning fund balance and encumbrance carryovers, and therefore this policy is not applicable to this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The FY 2025-26 Appropriation Schedule is hereby amended by adjusting appropriations for certain expenditures in various funds as indicated by the increases and decreases presented in Exhibit 1; explanation of these changes are provided in the memorandum attached as Exhibit 2.The City Budget Office is directed to adjust FY 2026-27 General Fund Current Appropriation Level targets, as outlined in Exhibit 2, to reflect the addition of $4,455,568 in health benefit expenses to build up the health fund reserve.The number of authorized positions in the FY 2025-26 Revised Budget is hereby amended as presented in Exhibit 5.The actions amending the FY 2025-26 Revised Budget contained in this ordinance are binding City policy.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes4 meetings · 8 votes

Recorded amendments

Nov 20, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Smith 2: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Avalos, Kanal, Novick). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (3): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Smith. (Aye (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (5): Green, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (2): Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan).

Nov 12, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Green, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Smith, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading November 20, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.

Read all 7 exact motions
Nov 20, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Smith 2: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Avalos, Kanal, Novick). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (3): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Smith. (Aye (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (5): Green, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Nov 12, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (2): Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan).

Nov 12, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Green, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Smith, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading November 20, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.

Nov 3, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-403, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney (Aye (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman; Nay (1): Green; Absent (1): Avalos)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 20, 20254 yes · 5 no · 3 absent

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Smith 2: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Avalos, Kanal, Novick). Motion failed to pass.

Final Council action · Nov 20, 202510 yes · 0 no · 2 absent

Final action on 2025-403: Adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20255 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20253 yes · 6 no · 3 absent

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (3): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20254 yes · 5 no · 3 absent

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Smith. (Aye (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (5): Green, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20257 yes · 2 no · 3 absent

Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (2): Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan).

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20255 yes · 3 no · 4 absent

Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Green, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Smith, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading November 20, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 3, 20253 yes · 1 no · 1 absent

Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-403, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney (Aye (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman; Nay (1): Green; Absent (1): Avalos)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:09 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:28 AM PDT
Evidence hash
a2ffe65166a446d6
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed

  4. Council Action

    Passed to second reading

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council

  6. Council Action

    Continued