In the Fall Supplemental Budget (Technical Adjustment Ordinance or TAO), City Council adopts changes to appropriation levels in various funds and makes changes to Current Appropriation Level targets. Many programs and projects throughout the City are impacted by this action. The proposed legislation does not change any City policies.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes?
In the Fall Supplemental Budget (Technical Adjustment Ordinance or TAO), City Council adopts changes to appropriation levels in various funds and makes changes to Current Appropriation Level targets. Many programs and projects throughout the City are impacted by this action. The proposed legislation does not change any City policies.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes
Which services can Portland sustain when recurring costs grow faster than recurring revenue?
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns budget, taxes & finance and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThe public had the opportunity to provide online testimony for several weeks leading up to a publicly-noticed hearing, where community members may also provide virtual testimony. This supplemental budget is a part of a much larger budget process; the rest of the budget process is subject to extensive public outreach in the form of public meetings, public hearings, Council work sessions, requests, and analysis provided online and the inclusion of public budget advisors.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 10–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2025-403: Adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
Approval of the exhibits of this ordinance reflect appropriation changes in 48 funds by a net increase of $241.3 million, primarily resulting from truing up beginning fund balances and other resources between fiscal years. There is a net increase/decrease to General Fund contingency accounts. These changes are summarized in Exhibit 2. Additional details are available in Exhibit 7.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:Exhibit 1, attached, includes all incremental changes to the City appropriation schedule as a result of the Fall Supplemental Budget Process.A memorandum, attached as Exhibit 2, identifies programs, projects, or activities that require appropriation adjustments or transfer or appropriation within bureau and fund budgets.Exhibit 3, attached, shows, for informational purposes, a reconciliation of changes to all funds.Exhibit 4, attached, shows, for informational purposes, all requests materially affecting the General Fund.Exhibit 5, attached, shows all position changes.Exhibit 6, attached, shows all bureau decision package narrative with corresponding high-level financial information.Exhibit 7, attached, includes the Fall TAO memo published by the City Budget Office that explains changes of note.City financial policy FIN 2.03 dictates that "at least fifty-percent (50%) of General Fund discretionary revenue that exceeds budgeted beginning balance (adjusted for the difference in encumbrance carryovers and Council-authorized carryovers from the prior fiscal year) will be set aside during the Fall budget monitoring process for allocation to infrastructure maintenance or replacement in the subsequent budget process. This funding shall be allocated for projects relating to emergency preparedness, parks and recreation, and transportation." In FY 2025-26, there is a negative balance of General Fund discretionary after adjusting for budgeted beginning fund balance and encumbrance carryovers, and therefore this policy is not applicable to this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The FY 2025-26 Appropriation Schedule is hereby amended by adjusting appropriations for certain expenditures in various funds as indicated by the increases and decreases presented in Exhibit 1; explanation of these changes are provided in the memorandum attached as Exhibit 2.The City Budget Office is directed to adjust FY 2026-27 General Fund Current Appropriation Level targets, as outlined in Exhibit 2, to reflect the addition of $4,455,568 in health benefit expenses to build up the health fund reserve.The number of authorized positions in the FY 2025-26 Revised Budget is hereby amended as presented in Exhibit 5.The actions amending the FY 2025-26 Revised Budget contained in this ordinance are binding City policy.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes4 meetings · 8 votes
Recorded amendments
Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Smith 2: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Avalos, Kanal, Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (3): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Smith. (Aye (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (5): Green, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (2): Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan).
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Green, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Smith, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading November 20, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
Read all 7 exact motions
Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Smith 2: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Avalos, Kanal, Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (3): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Smith. (Aye (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (5): Green, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (2): Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan).
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Green, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Smith, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading November 20, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-403, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney (Aye (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman; Nay (1): Green; Absent (1): Avalos)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 20, 20254 yes · 5 no · 3 absent
Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Smith 2: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (4): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Ryan, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Avalos, Kanal, Novick). Motion failed to pass.
Final Council action · Nov 20, 202510 yes · 0 no · 2 absent
Final action on 2025-403: Adopt the FY 2025-26 Fall Supplemental Budget and make other budget related changes
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20255 yes · 7 no
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20253 yes · 6 no · 3 absent
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Smith 1: Moved by Smith and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (3): Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20254 yes · 5 no · 3 absent
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Smith. (Aye (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Koyama Lane; Nay (5): Green, Kanal, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20257 yes · 2 no · 3 absent
Motion to amend proposed amendment Morillo 1 as shown in Green 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (2): Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (3): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan).
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 12, 20255 yes · 3 no · 4 absent
Motion to amend the ordinance as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Green, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (3): Smith, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Ryan). Motion failed to pass. Passed to second reading November 20, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Nov 3, 20253 yes · 1 no · 1 absent
Motion to send the Ordinance, document number 2025-403, to the full Council with the recommendation that it be passed: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney (Aye (3): Pirtle-Guiney, Novick, Zimmerman; Nay (1): Green; Absent (1): Avalos)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:09 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:28 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- a2ffe65166a446d6
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Passed
- Council Action
Passed to second reading
- Council Action
Referred to City Council
- Council Action
Continued