On June 25, 2025, Portland City Council passed Resolution 37709, "Support and expand Portland Street Response as a co-equal branch of the first responder system and establish the Portland Street Response Committee," which authorized a 15-member PSR Committee. This resolution appoints 14 community members to the committee and confirms the Mayor's appointment of 1 PSR staff member to the committee.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland appoint members to the Portland Street Response Committee?
On June 25, 2025, Portland City Council passed Resolution 37709, "Support and expand Portland Street Response as a co-equal branch of the first responder system and establish the Portland Street Response Committee," which authorized a 15-member PSR Committee. This resolution appoints 14 community members to the committee and confirms the Mayor's appointment of 1 PSR staff member to the committee.
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
Appoint members to the Portland Street Response Committee
What role should an unarmed behavioral-health team play alongside police, fire, and other crisis services?
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns transportation & public works and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordPSR was designed and driven by community support, and the goal of the PSR Committee is to give community members an official voice in the future of PSR. Community groups, such as Friends of PSR, have been calling for the establishment of a PSR Committee for several years.Outreach for applications for committee membership was conducted in all districts. Council offices, the Mayor's office, PSR, and Friends of PSR all promoted the committee application process and encouraged people to apply. In applications, District 3 was overrepresented and District 1 underrepresented, the latter of which is in line with a broader Citywide trend. Better outreach to recruit District 1 applicants should be a primary focus of future City recruitments.Relative to applicant counts, District 1 had the highest level of representation and District 3 the lowest:District 1: 2 appointees of 7 applicantsDistrict 2: 4 appointees of 12 applicantsDistrict 3: 4 appointees of 31 applicantsDistrict 4: 3 appointees of 25 applicantsNon-Portland residents: 1 appointee of 10 applicantsThe Resolution that established the PSR Committee stated that committee membership must be broadly representative of the population of the City of Portland and those most affected by PSR's operations. It noted that final committee membership must include representation from people with lived experience with behavioral or mental health issues. Based on what applicants were willing to voluntarily disclose, at least eight of the appointees have lived experience with behavioral and mental health issues.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 12–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2025-479: Appoint members to the Portland Street Response Committee
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
Appointing members of the committee will also implement a portion of Resolution 37709 authorizing stipends for community members, which will total $7,000. This cost will need to be absorbed into the existing PSSA budget.Staffing for the Office of Civic Life or other parts of the administration providing support for the onboarding and mandatory training are expected to be minimal and part of the responsibilities of existing staff.This resolution will continue a process initiated by Resolution 37709 to expand Portland Street Response. Expanding Portland Street Response is intended to divert appropriate calls from traditional police response, reduce the likelihood of use-of-force incidents, decrease emergency room services, and strengthen connections to community-based resources. This model has demonstrated greater cost-effectiveness as a crisis response approach. Recent studies indicate that the direct costs associated with alternative response models are approximately one-fourth that of police-only responses.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2025, Portland City Council passed Resolution 37709, "Support and expand Portland Street Response as a co-equal branch of the first responder system and establish the Portland Street Response Committee"; andWHEREAS, through Resolution 37709 the City Council authorized a 15-member PSR Committee, consisting of one Mayoral appointee from the PSR staff, and 14 Council-appointed community members; andWHEREAS, the PSR Committee was established to formally advise the City Council on issues related to Portland Street Response, advise on proposed changes to City Code related to PSR, and provide its first report and recommendations to Council within six months of appointment; andWHEREAS, staff in Council Offices worked with the Office of Civic Life to conduct an open recruitment for applicants to serve on the PSR Committee, with applications open for six weeks and closing on October 27, 2025; andWHEREAS, 85 individuals applied for the Committee, representing over 6 applications received for each Committee position available; andWHEREAS, a 5-member committee reviewed the written applications and recommended 29 finalists for interviews. This committee included:One representative from each of the Offices of the Co-Chairs for the Community and Public Safety Committee;One representative from the Office of the Council President;One PSR Staff member;One Community Reviewer; andWHEREAS, a 5-member committee conducted interviews of the selected finalists and recommended 14 candidates for appointment. This committee included:One representative each from three Council offices;One PSR Staff member;One Community Reviewer; andWHEREAS, the Mayor has named a PSR staff member to serve on the PSR Committee;NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council appoints the 13 community members listed below to the PSR Committee; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council confirms the Mayor's appointment of the staff member listed below to the PSR Committee; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all fourteen members of the PSR Committee will serve for six months following their onboarding and completion of mandatory City trainings for volunteers, and then will continue their service through their required six-month report and follow-up, and if extended by Council; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council requests that the Mayor direct relevant parts of the administration to support the completion of onboarding and mandatory training for all members as soon as possible following the passage of this resolution.Full MembershipNameType (Staff / Community)Term Start DateTerm End DateAkhila BandloraCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Mia EderaCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Rodney S HooleCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Jamie KennelCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Estelle Love LavespereCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Emily LeicklyCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Beatrix LiCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Robyn MatsumotoCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Marcelo PachecoCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Jill RipesCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Kaia SandCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Chris ThompsonCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Sasha VineCouncil Appointee – CommunityJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026Caroline PopeMayoral Appointee – PSR StaffJanuary 1, 2026June 30, 2026
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 2 exact motions
Motion to separate the question to vote on the appointment of Rebekah Morgan separately: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Clark. Vote called on appointment of Rebekah Morgan: (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Dunphy, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Failed to pass.
Motion to refer the Resolution, Document Number 2025-479, to City Council with the recommendation that it be adopted: Moved by Smith and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5) Zimmerman, Smith, Kanal, Morillo, Novick)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Dec 18, 20255 yes · 7 no
Motion to separate the question to vote on the appointment of Rebekah Morgan separately: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Clark. Vote called on appointment of Rebekah Morgan: (Aye (5): Green, Avalos, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (7): Clark, Zimmerman, Dunphy, Smith, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney). Failed to pass.
Final Council action · Dec 18, 202512 yes · 0 no
Final action on 2025-479: Appoint members to the Portland Street Response Committee
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:08 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:27 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- efcddec4c69b7e5d
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Adopted as amended by council
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Adopted as amended
- Council Action
Referred to City Council