Decisions/2026-126
Emergency ordinance2026-126

What is Portland deciding about add Code to establish the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (add Code Chapter 3.23)?

The purpose of this legislation is to codify the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (PCCEP) into Portland City Code, formally establishing it as a community advisory body to the Mayor and Chief of Police and ensuring the continuation of its work. PCCEP previously recommended codification in July 2024, and the code language was drafted but not formally adopted. Considering the termination of the PCCEP subsection of the U.S. Department of Justice Settlement Agreement, codification is necessary to preserve PCCEP's role, maintain its direct advisory relationship with City leadership, and reaffirm the City's commitment to community-engaged policing.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

*Add Code to establish the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (add Code Chapter 3.23)

This is one chapter of a larger storyPolice accountability

Will the voter-approved civilian oversight system become independent, fair, timely, and durable in practice?

Start with the full topic dossier
Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The purpose of this legislation is to codify the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (PCCEP) into Portland City Code, formally establishing it as a community advisory body to the Mayor and Chief of Police and ensuring the continuation of its work. PCCEP previously recommended codification in July 2024, and the code language was drafted but not formally adopted. Considering the termination of the PCCEP subsection of the U.S. Department of Justice Settlement Agreement, codification is necessary to preserve PCCEP's role, maintain its direct advisory relationship with City leadership, and reaffirm the City's commitment to community-engaged policing.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

This legislation codifies the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (PCCEP) into City Code, preserving a structured, citywide forum for community input and dialogue with the Portland Police Bureau, particularly for communities disproportionately impacted by policing practices, including Black, Indigenous, and other communities of color, people with disabilities, individuals experiencing mental health challenges, immigrants and refugees, low-income residents, and others historically under-served. The action maintains PCCEP's advisory role to the Mayor and Chief of Police and ensures continuity and stability amid changes to the federal Settlement Agreement, with no anticipated negative community or business impacts. Codification directly reflects PCCEP's July 2024 recommendation and draft language, demonstrating that public engagement and Committee input shaped the proposed legislation. Support has centered on sustaining community voice and honoring prior commitments, while questions regarding scope and future governance updates will be addressed through modernization of the PCCEP Plan in collaboration with stakeholders. Testimony is anticipated from PCCEP members and community-based organizations engaged in police bureau policies and civil rights advocacy.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This legislation codifies the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (PCCEP) into Portland City Code and does not, in itself, create new long-term financial obligations for the City. The proposed legislation does not amend the City's current adopted budget and does not require new appropriations at this time. PCCEP is an existing body currently supported through existing bureau resources. Any administrative, legal, or staff support necessary to implement codification is expected to be absorbed within existing budgeted resources.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionEmergency ordinance 192168

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains. Section 1. The Council finds: In 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon ("Court") entered the Order Entering Settlement Agreement between the City and the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") in the matter of The United States of America v. The City of Portland, Case No. 12-cv-02265-SI ("Settlement Agreement").In 2018, the Settlement Agreement was amended to create the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (PCCEP).After PCCEP was created, the City Council adopted the PCCEP Plan on September 5, 2018, by Council Resolution 37384, and the Settlement Agreement was amended to include the PCCEP Plan as Exhibit 1.The City values PCCEP's unique and vital role over more than seven years in engaging Portland's varied and diverse communities and the Portland Police Bureau (PPB) to further the shared goal of equitable policing that exceeds constitutional standards and to foster meaningful community engagement with, and trust in, PPB.Due to the City's sustained substantial compliance with the Settlement Agreement provisions requiring PCCEP's formation and governing its operations, the discrete subsection of the Agreement addressing those requirements was subject to termination. The City and DOJ, on March 3, 2026, filed a joint stipulated motion with the Court to terminate the PCCEP compliance provisions. The Court granted the motion to terminate this discrete section on March 13, 2026.PCCEP retains a role under the Settlement Agreement, including reporting directly to the Court at status conferences.The City will benefit from establishing PCCEP in City Code as this will ensure that the duties of PCCEP extend beyond the partial termination of the PCCEP provisions within the Settlement Agreement.Proposed Code Chapter 3.23, attached as Exhibit A, codifies PCCEP.PCCEP has long urged the Mayor and Council to codify PCCEP. The Proposed Chapter 3.23 is based on the Committee's 2024 codification recommendation, reflects Portland's new form of government, and incorporates further requirements from terminated Settlement Agreement provisions, while preserving PCCEP's autonomy in developing, recommending and executing its workplan.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: Add Code Chapter 3.23 as shown in Exhibit A.Section 2. The Council declares an emergency exists to continue the valuable contributions of the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing, unclouded by uncertainty about PCCEP's status given the Court's termination of the PCCEP discrete section of the Settlement Agreement; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes2 meetings · 2 votes

Recorded amendments

Apr 16, 2026 · Withdrawn

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Smith. Motion withdrawn.

Apr 16, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend Subsection 3.23.030 A. in Exhibit A to change "ages 15 to 25" to "ages 15 to 23": Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Smith. (Aye (9): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Smith, Dunphy; Nay (2): Kanal, Avalos; Absent (1): Koyama Lane)

Read all 2 exact motions
Apr 16, 2026 · Amendment · Withdrawn

Motion to amend the Ordinance as shown in Zimmerman 1: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Smith. Motion withdrawn.

Apr 16, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Subsection 3.23.030 A. in Exhibit A to change "ages 15 to 25" to "ages 15 to 23": Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Smith. (Aye (9): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Smith, Dunphy; Nay (2): Kanal, Avalos; Absent (1): Koyama Lane)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Apr 16, 20269 yes · 2 no · 1 absent

Motion to amend Subsection 3.23.030 A. in Exhibit A to change "ages 15 to 25" to "ages 15 to 23": Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Smith. (Aye (9): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Smith, Dunphy; Nay (2): Kanal, Avalos; Absent (1): Koyama Lane)

Final Council action · Apr 16, 202611 yes · 0 no · 1 absent

Vote register entry for 2026-126: *Add Code to establish the Portland Committee on Community-Engaged Policing (add Code Chapter 3.23)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:05 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:24 AM PDT
Evidence hash
fd4af7b81b2461c5
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  4. Council Action

    Continued