Decisions/2026-242
Ordinance2026-242

Should Portland amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for a vacant lot on NW 31st Ave described as Willamette Heights Addition, Block 18, Lot 14 at the…

The request is not for a legislative action, but for approval of a Type III quasi-judicial land use review. The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map designations on the site.Quasi-judicial procedures described in Zoning Code Chapter 33.730, commonly known as land use reviews, are handled by Portland Permitting & Development. Quasi-judicial procedures specifically describe the City Council as the decision-maker for Type III Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and concurrent review requests, per 33.730.030.F.3.a(2).The Hearings Officer has recommended approval of the land use review. Staff will be presenting the Hearings Officer's recommendation at the hearing.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for a vacant lot on NW 31st Ave described as Willamette Heights Addition, Block 18, Lot 14 at the request of Portland Parks and Recreation (LU 26-007966 CP ZC)

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

The request is not for a legislative action, but for approval of a Type III quasi-judicial land use review. The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map designations on the site.Quasi-judicial procedures described in Zoning Code Chapter 33.730, commonly known as land use reviews, are handled by Portland Permitting & Development. Quasi-judicial procedures specifically describe the City Council as the decision-maker for Type III Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and concurrent review requests, per 33.730.030.F.3.a(2).The Hearings Officer has recommended approval of the land use review. Staff will be presenting the Hearings Officer's recommendation at the hearing.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The standard public involvement procedures for a Type III land use review process have been followed. A public hearing with the Hearings Officer was held regarding the proposal. One neighbor submitted written questions to the Hearings Officer about surveying and how the property would be valued and marketed, and these questions were addressed at the hearing by the applicant's representative. No other testimony was offered at the hearing.The Hearings Officer concluded that, on balance, the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map is found to be equally supportive of the Comprehensive Plan as a whole compared to the current designation, and that the approval criteria for the Zoning Map Amendment were met. The Hearings Officer recommends approval with no conditions.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This is not a legislative action. There are no costs to the City associated with this quasi-judicial land use review. The City resources necessary to review the application are covered by the land use review fees paid by the applicant.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents10 sources
Final legal actionOrdinance 192215

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Show 4 more documents
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The Applicant requests a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from Open Space to Residential 5,000 and a Zoning Map Amendment from OSc (Open Space with Environmental Conservation overlay) to R5cz (Single-Dwelling Residential 5,000 with Environmental Conservation and Constrained Sites overlays) for the property described as Willamette Heights Addition, Block 18, Lot 14.The City received an application complying with all requirements of Title 33, Planning and Zoning, of the Code of the City of Portland seeking Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment Review with the proper fee for filing paid.The Hearings Officer held a duly noticed public hearing on April 20, 2026, and issued a Recommendation on May 20, 2026 (PP&D file no. LU 26-007966 CP ZC and Hearings Office file no. 4260007). The Hearings Officer recommended approval of the requested Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment. Based on the findings and conclusions contained in the Recommendation of the Hearings Officer, the City Council finds the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and relevant Title 33 approval criteria.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:City Council adopts the facts, findings, conclusions, and recommendations as amended by Council in PP&D File No. LU 26-007966 CP ZC.City Council approves a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from Open Space to Residential 5,000 and a Zoning Map Amendment from OSc (Open Space with Environmental Conservation overlay) to R5cz (Single-Dwelling Residential 5,000 with Environmental Conservation and Constrained Sites overlays) for the property described as Willamette Heights Addition, Block 18, Lot 14.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 3 votes

Recorded amendments

Aug 6, 2026 · Passed

Motion to amend Ordinance to adopt the revised findings: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended August 12, 2026 at 9:45 am time certain

Read all 2 exact motions
Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Passed

Motion to amend Ordinance to adopt the revised findings: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended August 12, 2026 at 9:45 am time certain

Jul 23, 2026 · Main · Recorded

Motion to tentatively uphold the recommendation of the Hearings Officer and ask the applicant and staff to return with revised findings on August 6, 2026, at 2:00 pm time certain: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Final Council action · Aug 12, 202612 yes · 0 no

Final action on 2026-242: Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for a vacant lot on NW 31st Ave described as Willamette Heights Addition, Block 18, Lot 14 at the request of Portland Parks and Recreation (LU 26-007966 CP ZC)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 202612 yes

Motion to amend Ordinance to adopt the revised findings: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Green. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended August 12, 2026 at 9:45 am time certain

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jul 23, 202612 yes

Motion to tentatively uphold the recommendation of the Hearings Officer and ask the applicant and staff to return with revised findings on August 6, 2026, at 2:00 pm time certain: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

9 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.

Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:03 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 16, 2026, 4:08 PM PDT
Evidence hash
3217d64ff13ab81f
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  4. Council Action

    Passed as amended

  5. Council Action

    Passed to second reading as amended

  6. Council Action

    Tentatively accept the Hearing Officer’s recommendation of approval; prepare Findings