Decisions/2025-351
Resolution2025-351

Should Portland adopt the Portland Urban Forest Plan to improve public health, build resilience to climate change, and promote environmental justice?

Portland’s urban forest provides significant public health, environmental, and economic benefits. It is a critical part of the city’s climate change resilience and mitigation efforts.The urban forest is living infrastructure requiring proactive management and planning to ensure its long-term health, growth, and public safety.Portland’s first Urban Forestry Management Plan (UFMP) was adopted in 1995 by Ordinance 168979.In 2003, the Council adopted the 2004 Urban Forest Management Plan by Resolution No. 36189, which the City has been implementing over the past two decades.Per Portland City Code, the Urban Forest Plan is intended to be updated.In 2021, City Council directed (Resolution 37473) Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) to update the 2004 Urban Forest Management Plan and use the new plan to inform updates to the Tree Code (Title 11).PP&R created the Portland Urban Forest Plan in partnership with other City bureaus and regional agencies impacting Portland’s urban forest. Partner bureaus will help implement the plan and include the Portland Bureau of Transportation, Portland Water Bureau, Bureau of Environmental Services, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland Permitting & Development, Portland Fire & Rescue, and the Bureau of Emergency Management.The Plan is heavily informed by community guidance received from Portlanders living across the city and from diverse communities, including Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, immigrants and refugees, people with disabilities, older adults, youth, and people earning lower incomes.On August 21, 2025 the Urban Forestry Commission voted to recommend the Portland Urban Forest Plan to City Council for adoption and is transmitting it to City Council by letter of transmittal, attached as Exhibit B.Canopy cover is unevenly distributed throughout the City creating an environmental justice issue. Inequitable access to the public health and climate resilience benefits trees provide disproportionally impacts undeserved communities in Portland.Portlanders earning lower incomes are disproportionately impacted by the cost of maintaining trees.Recent reversal in citywide canopy growth, new pests, and the changing climate, including hotter, drier summers and more frequent and intense winter storms, present new management challenges that must be considered and proactively addressed to maintain the health of the urban forest and protect public health and safety.The Portland Urban Forest Plan presents a new unified vision, goals, and tree canopy targets to guide management of the urban forest.The Portland Urban Forest Plan includes actions to preserve, care for, and expand tree canopy and enhance collaboration with Portlanders and across City bureaus. These actions will reduce the impacts of urban heat and improve public health, safety, and water quality. They will help achieve plan goals, as well as goals and policies in the City’s climate plans and 2035 Comprehensive Plan.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Adopt the Portland Urban Forest Plan to improve public health, build resilience to climate change, and promote environmental justice

This is one chapter of a larger storyUrban Forest Plan

Will Portland turn its citywide tree-canopy and equity goals into funded programs, code, maintenance, and measurable neighborhood results?

Start with the full topic dossier
Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

Portland’s urban forest provides significant public health, environmental, and economic benefits. It is a critical part of the city’s climate change resilience and mitigation efforts.The urban forest is living infrastructure requiring proactive management and planning to ensure its long-term health, growth, and public safety.Portland’s first Urban Forestry Management Plan (UFMP) was adopted in 1995 by Ordinance 168979.In 2003, the Council adopted the 2004 Urban Forest Management Plan by Resolution No. 36189, which the City has been implementing over the past two decades.Per Portland City Code, the Urban Forest Plan is intended to be updated.In 2021, City Council directed (Resolution 37473) Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) to update the 2004 Urban Forest Management Plan and use the new plan to inform updates to the Tree Code (Title 11).PP&R created the Portland Urban Forest Plan in partnership with other City bureaus and regional agencies impacting Portland’s urban forest. Partner bureaus will help implement the plan and include the Portland Bureau of Transportation, Portland Water Bureau, Bureau of Environmental Services, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland Permitting & Development, Portland Fire & Rescue, and the Bureau of Emergency Management.The Plan is heavily informed by community guidance received from Portlanders living across the city and from diverse communities, including Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, immigrants and refugees, people with disabilities, older adults, youth, and people earning lower incomes.On August 21, 2025 the Urban Forestry Commission voted to recommend the Portland Urban Forest Plan to City Council for adoption and is transmitting it to City Council by letter of transmittal, attached as Exhibit B.Canopy cover is unevenly distributed throughout the City creating an environmental justice issue. Inequitable access to the public health and climate resilience benefits trees provide disproportionally impacts undeserved communities in Portland.Portlanders earning lower incomes are disproportionately impacted by the cost of maintaining trees.Recent reversal in citywide canopy growth, new pests, and the changing climate, including hotter, drier summers and more frequent and intense winter storms, present new management challenges that must be considered and proactively addressed to maintain the health of the urban forest and protect public health and safety.The Portland Urban Forest Plan presents a new unified vision, goals, and tree canopy targets to guide management of the urban forest.The Portland Urban Forest Plan includes actions to preserve, care for, and expand tree canopy and enhance collaboration with Portlanders and across City bureaus. These actions will reduce the impacts of urban heat and improve public health, safety, and water quality. They will help achieve plan goals, as well as goals and policies in the City’s climate plans and 2035 Comprehensive Plan.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

Portland’s urban forest provides significant environmental, economic, social, and health benefits to Portlanders. The Plan discusses the uneven distribution of canopy and financial and physical impacts trees can place on Portlanders.In Portland, communities living on the east of the Willamette River, people of color, immigrant and refugee communities, and people earning lower incomes have less access to canopy and its associated benefits where they live, compared to other Portlanders. In addition, people living on fixed or low incomes, older adults, people with disabilities, and people who don’t speak English are often disproportionately burdened by tree care activities and costs.The Portland Urban Forest Plan was driven by community input, especially historically underserved communities and community members living in neighborhoods with less canopy than others. This included discussions with Portlanders living in different parts of the city and from specific communities, including Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, immigrants and refugees, people with disabilities, older adults, youth, and people earning lower incomes.Staff engaged community members for nearly two years to create the plan, including through in-person and virtual events, surveys, discussions, and open houses. Community members shared impacts of current urban forest distribution, programming, and policies and challenges for tree care and planting. Staff also sought input from Portlanders about the values and priorities to emphasize in the plan.A geographically and demographically diverse Community Advisory Committee (CAC) provided ongoing guidance and helped develop the plan. The CAC included community members who own property, pay rent, speak languages other than English, and have diverse opinions on trees and the urban forest.To hear additional perspectives, staff discussed the plan with groups representing environmental, public health, business, industrial, labor, and economic interests. Staff also reviewed the plan with the Multnomah Youth Commission, Portland Freight Committee, Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, Historic Landmarks Commission, Development Review Advisory Committee, Working Waterfront Coalition, Columbia Corridor Association, Building Owners & Managers Association of Oregon, Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP), and the Central Eastside Industrial Council, among others.The bureau sought input from Portlanders to develop the vision, goals, canopy targets, recommendations, and actions in the plan.The draft plan was available for public comment from February to April 2025.Per Title 11, the Urban Forestry Commission is a project advisory body and is responsible for submitting a recommended plan to City Council. They provided input throughout the duration of the project, culminating with a final formal approval of the Plan in August 2025.The Portland Urban Forest Plan’s implementation strategy recommends dozens of policies, programs, and projects that will be implemented in partnership with community. Each program or project will be implemented with an equity lens to understand impacts and reduce barriers to participation.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Adopted as amended by council

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

Adoption of this non-binding resolution does not obligate any new funding from or amend existing appropriations. Implementing many of the policies, programs, and projects recommended in the Portland Urban Forest Plan will likely require new future resources. The plan does not include exact costs, instead it provides planning level, relative cost estimates for each implementation action. More than half of the actions are expected to be achievable if existing funding levels continue. These actions reflect the continuation or expansion of existing programs and services. Several actions call for improved coordination, policy, or process updates and require limited additional funding or staff resources. A few actions require the creation of new programs. Several of the most expensive action items come from the Climate Investment Plan and initial funding is provided by the Portland Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund. Most action items in the plan will be led by PP&R; limiting the majority of fiscal impacts to one bureau. However, several actions are the responsibility of other bureaus, notably Portland Permitting & Development, the Portland Bureau of Transportation, and the Bureau of Environmental Services. Suggested implementation timelines are included to indicate that not all funding is needed at once. The Plan and associated funding needs are intended to be implemented in a phased approach over the next eight to ten years.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionResolution 37720

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

WHEREAS, Portland’s urban forest is essential green infrastructure and a critical feature of the urban environment which contributes to the public health and wellbeing of the city’s residents, provides habitat for wildlife, promotes the stability and health of its natural systems, and delivers significant livability and economic benefits; and WHEREAS, on June 30, 2020, the City of Portland declared a climate emergency (Resolution 37494) stating “a human-made climate emergency also threatens our city, our region, our state, our nation, humanity and the natural world, and that such an emergency calls for an immediate mobilization effort initiating greater action, resources, collaboration and new approaches to restore a safe climate”; and WHEREAS, the risks presented by Portland’s changing climate necessitate urgent mitigation and adaptation actions to protect public health and well-being and the stability of trees, plants, wildlife, and natural systems; andWHEREAS, inequitable access to the public health and climate resilience benefits trees provide is an urgent environmental justice issue which disproportionally impacts historically underserved communities in Portland; andWHEREAS, Portland’s first Urban Forestry Management Plan (UFMP) was adopted in 1995 by Ordinance 168979; andWHEREAS, in 2003 the Council adopted the 2004 Urban Forest Management Plan by Resolution No. 36189, which the City has been implementing over the past two decades; andWHEREAS, per Portland City Code, the Urban Forest Plan is intended to be updated every ten years; and WHEREAS, in 2021, City Council directed (Resolution 37473) Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) to update the 2004 Urban Forest Management Plan and subsequently use the new plan to inform updates to the Tree Code (Title 11); andWHEREAS, PP&R created the Portland Urban Forest Plan in partnership with other City bureaus and regional agencies who engage or impact Portland’s urban forest. Partner bureaus will help implement the plan and include the Portland Bureau of Transportation, Portland Water Bureau, Bureau of Environmental Services, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland Permitting & Development, Portland Fire & Rescue, Bureau of Emergency Management; andWHEREAS, the Portland Urban Forest Plan was advised by a geographically and demographically diverse Community Advisory Committee comprised of representatives from across Portland; andWHEREAS, the Plan is deeply informed by community guidance received from Portlanders living across the city including Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, immigrants and refugees, people with disabilities, older adults, people earning lower incomes, local business owners, tree care providers, industrial and commercial organizations, environmental organizations, homeowners and renters, and City of Portland advisory groups; andWHEREAS, the Portland Urban Forest Plan presents a new vision, goals, and tree canopy targets to guide City programs, services, and investments related to the urban forest; andWHEREAS, the Portland Urban Forest Plan includes actions to preserve, care for, and expand tree canopy, reduce the cost of tree care and maintenance for residents, and enhance collaboration with Portlanders. These actions will reduce the impacts of urban heat and improve public health, safety, and water quality. They will help achieve plan goals, as well as goals and policies in the City’s climate plans and 2035 Comprehensive Plan; andWHEREAS, on August 21, 2025 the Urban Forestry Commission voted to recommend the Portland Urban Forest Plan to City Council for adoption and is submitting it to City Council by letter of transmittal, attached as Exhibit B.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Portland adopts the Portland Urban Forest Plan, as shown in Exhibit A; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council directs staff to engage in activities aimed at implementing the recommendations of the Portland Urban Forest Plan; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this resolution is non-binding city policy.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes4 meetings · 13 votes

Recorded amendments

Oct 22, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 1-3: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (10): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark; Absent (1): Smith)

Oct 22, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 6: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith)

Oct 22, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 7: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Oct 22, 2025 · Failed

Motion to amend Action Item 2-4 in Exhibit A as shown in Novick 2: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick; Nay (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Oct 22, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Action Item 2-3 to replace "establish a plan for" with "develop a plan that would, if implemented, allow": Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Kanal, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Absent (1): Smith)

Oct 16, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 1, 2, 3 and 4: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Kanal.

Oct 16, 2025 · Continued

Motion to divide the amendments into Dunphy 1-3 and Dunphy 4: Moved by Novick. Vote called on Dunphy 4: (Aye (10): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (2): Clark, Ryan) Vote not called on Dunphy 1-3. Item continued to October 22, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Sep 25, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (1): Novick)

Sep 25, 2025 · Passed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Novick) Amendment to revise Kanal 2 to replace "establish a plan that takes into account current projects underway for the City and to assume legal and financial responsibility for street tree-related sidewalk repairs" to state "develop a plan for how the City could assume legal and financial responsibility for street tree-related sidewalk repairs that takes into account current projects underway for the City and includes an estimate of potential costs.": Approved by unanimous consent.

Sep 25, 2025 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 3: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Novick)

Sep 25, 2025 · Passed

Motion to send resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-352, to the full Council with recommendation the resolution be adopted: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (1): Novick)

Read all 14 exact motions
Oct 22, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 1-3: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (10): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark; Absent (1): Smith)

Oct 22, 2025 · Main · Recorded

Motion to separate Dunphy 6 and 7: Moved by Zimmerman.

Oct 22, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 6: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith)

Oct 22, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 7: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Oct 22, 2025 · Main · Failed

Motion to replace Action Item 2-3 with "Sustainably fund and implement a comprehensive citywide street tree maintenance program to reduce financial burdens for Portlanders, improve the health and safety of the city's trees, and support habitat connectivity.": Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Oct 22, 2025 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Action Item 2-4 in Exhibit A as shown in Novick 2: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick; Nay (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Oct 22, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Action Item 2-3 to replace "establish a plan for" with "develop a plan that would, if implemented, allow": Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Kanal, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Absent (1): Smith)

Oct 16, 2025 · Procedural · Recorded

Motion to limit debate to an additional 20 minutes, and then move to a vote or to postpone: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (11): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark)

Oct 16, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 1, 2, 3 and 4: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Kanal.

Oct 16, 2025 · Amendment · Continued

Motion to divide the amendments into Dunphy 1-3 and Dunphy 4: Moved by Novick. Vote called on Dunphy 4: (Aye (10): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (2): Clark, Ryan) Vote not called on Dunphy 1-3. Item continued to October 22, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Sep 25, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (1): Novick)

Sep 25, 2025 · Amendment · Passed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Novick) Amendment to revise Kanal 2 to replace "establish a plan that takes into account current projects underway for the City and to assume legal and financial responsibility for street tree-related sidewalk repairs" to state "develop a plan for how the City could assume legal and financial responsibility for street tree-related sidewalk repairs that takes into account current projects underway for the City and includes an estimate of potential costs.": Approved by unanimous consent.

Sep 25, 2025 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 3: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Novick)

Sep 25, 2025 · Main · Passed

Motion to send resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-352, to the full Council with recommendation the resolution be adopted: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (1): Novick)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 22, 202510 yes · 1 no · 1 absent

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 1-3: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (10): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark; Absent (1): Smith)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 22, 202510 yes · 1 no · 1 absent

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 6: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (10): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick; Nay (1): Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 22, 20256 yes · 5 no · 1 absent

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy 7: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Nay (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 22, 20255 yes · 6 no · 1 absent

Motion to replace Action Item 2-3 with "Sustainably fund and implement a comprehensive citywide street tree maintenance program to reduce financial burdens for Portlanders, improve the health and safety of the city's trees, and support habitat connectivity.": Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (6): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 22, 20254 yes · 7 no · 1 absent

Motion to amend Action Item 2-4 in Exhibit A as shown in Novick 2: Moved by Novick and seconded by Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (4): Clark, Zimmerman, Ryan, Novick; Nay (7): Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Pirtle-Guiney; Absent (1): Smith). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 22, 20257 yes · 4 no · 1 absent

Motion to amend Action Item 2-3 to replace "establish a plan for" with "develop a plan that would, if implemented, allow": Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (7): Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Kanal, Ryan, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (4): Avalos, Dunphy, Koyama Lane, Morillo; Absent (1): Smith)

Final Council action · Oct 22, 202511 yes · 0 no · 1 absent

Final action on 2025-351: Adopt the Portland Urban Forest Plan to improve public health, build resilience to climate change, and promote environmental justice

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 16, 202511 yes · 1 no

Motion to limit debate to an additional 20 minutes, and then move to a vote or to postpone: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (11): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (1): Clark)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Oct 16, 202510 yes · 2 no

Motion to divide the amendments into Dunphy 1-3 and Dunphy 4: Moved by Novick. Vote called on Dunphy 4: (Aye (10): Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Pirtle-Guiney; Nay (2): Clark, Ryan) Vote not called on Dunphy 1-3. Item continued to October 22, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 25, 20254 yes · 1 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (1): Novick)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 25, 20255 yes

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Novick) Amendment to revise Kanal 2 to replace "establish a plan that takes into account current projects underway for the City and to assume legal and financial responsibility for street tree-related sidewalk repairs" to state "develop a plan for how the City could assume legal and financial responsibility for street tree-related sidewalk repairs that takes into account

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 25, 20255 yes

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 3: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (5): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan, Novick)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Sep 25, 20254 yes · 1 no

Motion to send resolution as amended, Document Number 2025-352, to the full Council with recommendation the resolution be adopted: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Morillo, Avalos, Kanal, Ryan; Nay (1): Novick)

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The action is expressly non-binding; executed acceptance by every named counterparty is not established by this check.

Unknown
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:10 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:29 AM PDT
Evidence hash
ed0a51befd4a0aab
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Adopted as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Adopted as amended

  4. Council Action

    Continued

  5. Council Action

    Referred to City Council as amended

  6. Council Action

    Continued