Decisions/2025-419
Emergency ordinance2025-419

Should Portland authorize City Attorney to settle lawsuit related to construction of the Streetcar approach ramp located near SE 2nd Ave and accept lump sum payment in…

This Ordinance settles a lawsuit brought by the City against Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District and Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. for defects related to the construction of an on-grade approach ramp for the Streetcar system located at SE 2nd Avenue.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

*Authorize City Attorney to settle lawsuit related to construction of the Streetcar approach ramp located near SE 2nd Ave and accept lump sum payment in the amount of $7,500,000

Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

This Ordinance settles a lawsuit brought by the City against Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District and Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. for defects related to the construction of an on-grade approach ramp for the Streetcar system located at SE 2nd Avenue.

Official proposal and impact statement
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

This Ordinance settles a lawsuit alleging breach of contract and negligence against parties who performed design and construction services for the ramp project. No public involvement or input was sought regarding this Ordinance. The City Attorney's Office and City Administrator have concluded that it is not appropriate to have public involvement in settlement negotiations regarding lawsuits on behalf of the City.No future public involvement is anticipated or necessary. Approval by City Council of this Ordinance will fully settle the lawsuit in favor of the City of Portland.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Passed

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

This legislation will have no impact on City revenue.The City will receive a lump sum payment on behalf of all defendants in the amount of $7.5 million, allocated for repairs for this structure. This Ordinance does not amend the budget.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents1 sources
Final legal actionEmergency ordinance 192118

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Read the full official text

The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The City, through its attorneys, filed a lawsuit against Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (TriMet) and Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. for damages arising from the construction of the Streetcar on-grade approach ramp located at SE 2nd Avenue.The City alleged breach of contract and negligence claims against the defendants.The City has concluded that after extensive analysis of the facts and applicable law, and taking into account the risks and uncertainties associated with litigation, the Settlement Agreement is desirable to avoid the time, risk, and expense of protracted litigation.The settlement provides a lump sum payment to the City. It also requires TriMet to provide additional support to the City to complete the repairs. Specifically, TriMet will assist the City in identifying and securing additional funding; TriMet will provide the City with technical assistance; and TriMet will provide service interruption assistance at no cost to the City if repairs are performed within the construction window for other contemplated repairs.The City Attorney, Portland Bureau of Transportation, and the Mayor's office recommend approval of the Settlement Agreement.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Settlement Agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor or Mayor's designee is authorized to execute the Settlement Agreement on behalf of the City.Section 2. The Council declares that an emergency exists in order to avoid undue and costly delay in settling this lawsuit; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 1 votes
Final Council action · Oct 29, 20259 yes · 0 no · 3 absent

Final action on 2025-419: *Authorize City Attorney to settle lawsuit related to construction of the Streetcar approach ramp located near SE 2nd Ave and accept lump sum payment in the amount of $7,500,000

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.

Complete
Supporting documents

No linked attachments were found on the official page.

Unknown
Referenced exhibit integrity

No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.

Not Applicable
Counterparty acceptance

The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.

Not Applicable
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:09 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 13, 2026, 2:28 AM PDT
Evidence hash
df6a69a20d497e2f
Guide status
Deterministic baseline
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Passed

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Passed