Thursday, June 11, 2026 at 2:30 AM

Motion to amend Document 2026-199 as shown in the Technical Amendment: Moved by Ryan and seconded by Dunphy. (Aye (12): Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Dunphy) Passed to second reading as amended June 17, 2026 at 6:15 pm time certain

Motion to suspend the rules to continue debate on the remaining amendments: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Smith. (Aye (6): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith; Nay (6): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy). Motion failed. Presiding officer ruled that the Council did not have enough time to consider Pirtle-Guiney-Novick amendment 5. Appeal of the ruling of the presiding officer and the following question put before the Council, “Shall the ruling of the presiding officer be upheld to not consider Pirtle-Guiney-Novick amendment 5?”: Appeal by Zimmerman joined by Smith and Pirtle-Guiney. (Aye (6): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy; Nay (6): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith.) Appeal fails. The ruling of the presiding officer is upheld and the amendment is not considered. Passed to second reading as amended June 17, 2026 at 6:15 pm time certain

Motion to suspend the rules to reopen Document 2026-196 in order to allow Councilors to move amendments filed with the Clerk that have not yet been voted on: Moved by Pirtle-Guiney and seconded by Smith. (Aye (6): Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith; Nay (6): Kanal, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy.) Motion failed.