The proposal would approve one year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy that reflects lower revenues for FY 2025-26.
Official proposal and impact statementShould Portland approve one year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy that reflects lower revenues for FY 2025-26?
The proposal would approve one year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy that reflects lower revenues for FY 2025-26.
Official matter recordSee the official legal title
*Approve one year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy that reflects lower revenues for FY 2025-26
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns arts, parks & community life and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordThe reviewed impact statement does not identify a specific affected population.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 12–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2025-226: *Approve one year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy that reflects lower revenues for FY 2025-26
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
No verified financial description was found in the published impact statement.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds: The City proposed and voters approved a local option property tax levy at the November 5, 2002, general election to fund programs to help children in Portland. The levy created the Portland Children’s Levy (PCL) to make targeted investments in proven programs.In May 2023 voters approved a fourth renewal of the local property tax levy to continue supporting the PCL to invest in proven programs in the areas of early childhood, child abuse prevention and intervention, foster care, after-school, mentoring and hunger relief. A five-person citizen Allocation Committee was created to make recommendations regarding the expenditure of levy funds.On April 23, 2025, the Allocation Committee voted to make recommendations to fund early childhood, child abuse prevention and intervention, foster care, hunger relief, afterschool, and mentoring programs.Council remanded the recommendations to the PCL for further consideration. Council intends to allow continuation of current funding, allowing the Director of PCL to adjust current funding proportionately to reflecting lower revenues of the PCL for FY 2025-2026, while allowing the remand process to be considered.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:The Director of PCL is authorized and directed to enter into grant agreements, which shall be effective as of July 1, 2025, with all grantees on the current PCL allocation schedule for a period not to exceed 12 months to avoid a stoppage of PCL programs in the FY25-26 period while the remand process for PCL allocations is conducted.The Director is authorized and directed to allocate current grantees the current annual grant amount, each decreased by an equal percentage of no more than 25% of the current funding for respective organizations to reflect an expected decrease in FY 2025-2026 revenues.In the event that any grantee becomes unwilling or unable to use City grant funds in a manner consistent with a grant agreement that is authorized by this ordinance, the Director is hereby authorized to terminate the grant agreement in accordance with its terms.Section 2. The Council declares that an emergency exists in order to avoid a disruption in funding for this important work; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 2 votes
Read all 1 exact motions
Motion to suspend the rules to add an ordinance to the agenda to extend the current levels of funding in the Portland Children's Levy with authority granted up to the 25% mark to the director for reductions given the reduction in revenue for the upcoming 12 months not to exceed one year: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 4, 202512 yes
Motion to suspend the rules to add an ordinance to the agenda to extend the current levels of funding in the Portland Children's Levy with authority granted up to the 25% mark to the director for reductions given the reduction in revenue for the upcoming 12 months not to exceed one year: Moved by Zimmerman and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Final Council action · Jun 4, 202512 yes · 0 no
Final action on 2025-226: *Approve one year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy that reflects lower revenues for FY 2025-26
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
Financial impact was not found in the reviewed materials.
A funding source could not be determined from reviewed materials.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
No explicit exhibit reference was detected in the official text.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:14 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 14, 2026, 2:22 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- f62356e90078fafc
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Passed