Final-action roll calls · January 2025 → today
Who votes together—and where.
Explore each councilor’s record by topic, the pairs that repeatedly align on divided votes, and the issues where Council finds the most and least agreement. Every pattern is linked back to the public record.
321final actions analyzed
Issue landscape
Ranked by share of divided final actionsWhere Council divides most.
A divided vote contains at least one yes and one no. A higher rate means Council divided more often on matters in that topic—not that every disagreement was equally consequential.
01
Public safety14 divided · 37 final actions
38%02Housing & homelessness6 divided · 29 final actions
21%03Transportation & public works14 divided · 69 final actions
20%04Arts, parks & community life1 divided · 5 final actions
20%05Government & democracy6 divided · 32 final actions
19%06Economy & business2 divided · 11 final actions
18%07Budget, taxes & finance10 divided · 59 final actions
17%08Climate & environment3 divided · 20 final actions
15%09Labor & city workforce3 divided · 21 final actions
14%10Land use & permitting2 divided · 18 final actions
11%Selected issue record
Arts, parks & community life
Arts, culture, parks, recreation, civic life, and community programs.
20%of final actions were divided1 of 5 roll calls
4 no recorded dissent 1 divided1 decided within two votes
Councilor by councilor
Tap any councilor for their full recordThe voting record on community life.
A yes rate is not a “pro-topic” score: each roll call asks a different question. These cards report how each member voted on the proposals grouped here.
Candace AvalosDistrict 1
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 5
Jamie DunphyDistrict 1
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 5
Loretta SmithDistrict 1
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 4
Dan RyanDistrict 2
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 5
Elana Pirtle-GuineyDistrict 2
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 5
Sameer KanalDistrict 2
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 5
Angelita MorilloDistrict 3
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 5
Steve NovickDistrict 3
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 5
Tiffany Koyama LaneDistrict 3
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 5
Eric ZimmermanDistrict 4
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 5
Mitch GreenDistrict 4
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 5
Olivia ClarkDistrict 4
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 5
Implicit voting coalitions
Divided community life votes onlyWho lands on the same side.
These are observed voting alignments, not claims of an organized or explicit coalition. The calculation adjusts for each member’s underlying tendency to vote yes.
Most aligned pairs
Not enough divided votes to identify a stable alignment.
Most often on opposite sides
Not enough divided votes to identify a stable contrast.
The underlying decisions
Search all votes