Decisions/2026-280
Resolution2026-280

What did Portland authorize for the Moda Center negotiations?

This resolution approves the Proposed Terms for Moda Center Arena Renovation and Post Renovation Operations Term Sheet Lease attached at Exhibit A.The Moda Center is a City-owned facility, constructed in the 1990s, and transferred into City ownership in 2024. It is home to the Portland Trail Blazers, and hosts a wide variety of other events including WNBA games, NCAA games, concerts and family shows. While the facility has been well maintained and remains in good operating condition, many systems are original to the building and will require replacement in the coming years. Additionally, the facility requires a variety of upgrades to continue serving both as an NBA arena and hosting other events in the long-term.The resolution is non-binding, but if approved, sets in motion a period of negotiations with team ownership, state and county funding partners, as well as performance of due diligence and preparation of legal documents with the intent to bring binding contractual documents back to City Council for approval by December 31, 2026.Rip City Management is the sister company to the Portland Trail Blazers that operates the Moda Center and the Veterans Memorial Coliseum, which are both owned by the City of Portland. The City, Rip City Management, and the Portland Trail Blazers desire to enter into a long-term agreement that would commit the team to playing in a fully renovated Moda Center arena for 20 or more years. Because the City is unable to meet the full financial needs of an arena renovation alone, the State of Oregon and Multnomah County have agreed to help fund the renovation, subject to certain requirements and limitations.The State's funding commitment of $365 million is contingent on binding commitments of funding from the City and County by the end of 2026.Approval of this resolution sets in motion several months of negotiation and preparation of legal documents with the ownership of the franchise. Assuming terms acceptable to the parties can be reached, binding legal documents will be brought back to City Council for approval in December.These new legal documents will include a development agreement for arena renovations as well as a new operating lease for Moda Center with a term of at least 20 years. Several other existing related Rose Quarter agreements will also need to be revised and updated for consistency with the new lease and development agreement.

Official impact statement
See the official legal title

Authorize a non-binding term sheet with Rip City Management LLC and Trail Blazers Holdings, LLC outlining the terms for Moda Center arena renovation, operating and lease agreements that will keep the Portland Trail Blazers playing in Portland for at least 20 more years

This is one chapter of a larger storyModa Center

What should Portland receive in return for investing public money in a City-owned arena and a long-term team lease?

Start with the full topic dossier
Next appearanceFinal action is posted; watch for implementation updates.
Follow this matter
01 · Understand it

What this proposal would actually do.

Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.

What would change

Council authorized the Mayor to sign a non-binding term sheet and directed City Administration to negotiate the definitive agreements.

Reviewed official record
What would stay the same

The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.

Official matter record
Who may be affected

The Portland Trail Blazers and Moda Center are important community assets hosting hundreds of events every year with annual attendance of approximately 1.4 million people (1.7 million when including events held at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum, which is also operated by Rip City Management). The Portland Trail Blazers are a source of civic pride and a unifying force for many Portlanders and Oregonians. The economic, social, and cultural benefit of the team continuing to play at Moda Center is profound. The Portland Trail Blazers have a long history of giving back to Portland and Oregon. Since 2009, the Trail Blazers Foundation and Trail Blazers, Inc. have donated more than $17 million to local communities. The Team is dedicated to philanthropic efforts with particular focus on racial equity, environmental and educational initiatives.To gather community sentiment about the project and the City's financial participation, the Portland City Council hosted an online survey and series of park pop-ups in June 2026. Over 18,000 people took the survey both independently and at the pop-up events. The non-statistically valid results are available online at: https://www.portland.gov/venues/moda-center/moda-facts and reveal that public investment in Moda Center is a divisive issue with a majority of respondents feeling either strongly supportive of the project or strongly opposed. The draft proposed Term Sheet attached to this resolution as Exhibit A includes an initial proposal for a community benefits plan (see Exhibit B to the Term Sheet). This plan includes a variety of desired community benefits including labor provisions, transportation programs, community access to Moda Center and the Rose Quarter, environmental performance goals, neighborhood development commitments, and other items.Significant testimony from a broad segment of the community both in support of and in opposition to this resolution is anticipated.

Official community impact statement
What happens next

Council is due to consider the definitive agreements no later than December 31, 2026.

Latest official agenda appearance
02 · Evaluate it

What the record establishes and what it does not.

Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.

Final Council action

Passed · 8–4

Read the exact motion or vote question

Final action on 2026-280: Authorize a non-binding term sheet with Rip City Management LLC and Trail Blazers Holdings, LLC outlining the terms for Moda Center arena renovation, operating and lease agreements that will keep the Portland Trail Blazers playing in Portland for at least 20 more years

Rationale review not yet published

We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.

The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.

Financial implications

See related information in the Purpose and Background section above. Prior to acquiring Moda Center in 2024, the City commissioned a facility condition assessment of the arena that recommended phased investment of roughly $500 million would be required to keep the arena operating in good condition for 20 more years. The economic activity to the region and state of the Rose Quarter event campus is estimated at over $600 million in annual economic impact including nearly 6,000 full and part-time jobs, and total labor income of over $290 million. Roughly 75% of this economic activity is attributable to the Portland Trail Blazers and 25% to other activities at the Rose Quarter arenas. The greater economic impact of keeping the team at the Moda Center for the long term is important to the long-term economy of the city, region, and state and associated public revenue streams. The economic activity generated from operations of the Blazers and the Rose Quarter Campus produced approximately $17.9 million in total tax revenues to local and State economies in FY22-23, of which $11.3 million was attributable to the Trail Blazers and $6.6 million to the Rose Quarter Campus.In accordance with the Term Sheet attached as Exhibit A, a major renovation of Moda Center is proposed, with a publicly-funded budget of $573 million. In addition, ongoing support for eligible arena projects up to $288.6 million over 20 years is provided. The City's financial commitment to the project is proposed in two primary parts:$120 million, from sources yet to be confirmed, for the arena renovation project, and $275 million over 20 years in annual payments for eligible projects, from the City's Spectator Venues and Visitor Activities Fund which is primarily funded by ticket fees and parking revenues associated with events in city-owned spectator facilities. The renovation project is also slated to receive $365 million from the State, in accordance with Senate Bill 1501, and $88 million from Multnomah County. The County has also proposed contributing $13.6 million to the ongoing contributions for eligible projects. These financial commitments are described in Exhibit A. Despite these investments from other governments, the City will continue to be the sole owner of Moda Center.In a July 10, 2026 memo shared with the City Council on July 13, 2026 (provided as supplemental information), the City's Chief Financial Officer: 1) provided City Council and the City's governmental and private partners with confidence that the City can meet the original funding commitment to renovate the City-owned Moda Center and maintain the Trail Blazers as a long-term anchor tenant, should the initially proposed funding scenario not materialize; 2) presented information on possible financing scenarios, of which there are multiple options that could be explored; and 3) anticipated the City will continue to pursue any other legal and potentially feasible funding opportunities that may develop.Should the current lease expire without extension or replacement with a new long-term lease, funding facility upgrades will become a City-responsibility without the participation of identified funding partners.

Official financial impact statement
Open questions
  • The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
  • What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Source-reviewed terms

Specific numbers and conditions in the controlling documents.

Property-tax offset$3.0M / year

Escalated 5% annually and distributed proportionally among Multnomah County, the City, and Portland Public Schools.

Exhibit A - as amended
Public renovation estimate$573M

The term sheet says the figure is based on information to be verified; its detailed renovation-budget exhibit remains unfilled.

Exhibit A - as amended
Contemplated public contributions$120M · $88M · $365M

City, County, and State maximums respectively, subject to the definitive agreements and other stated conditions.

Exhibit A - as amended
County total cap$101.6M

$88 million for renovation plus up to $13.6 million of post-renovation capital funding described over the 20-year term.

Exhibit A - as amended
Important limits and unresolved details

What the current documents do not settle.

The adopted document is non-binding

The term sheet says it is a high-level guide for later definitive agreements. The reviewed City packet does not establish executed counterparty acceptance.

Exhibit A - as amended, page 1
The detailed renovation budget is not attached

The adopted document says the $573 million budget is itemized in Exhibit A, but that internal exhibit contains only: “NTD: Estimated Renovation Budget to be attached.” This is separate from the populated Exhibit D capital-funding schedule.

Exhibit A - as amended, page 12
Funding authority is not a final funding plan

The resolution authorizes negotiations without committing the City to a specific funding source; final sources and agreements remain future decisions.

Adopted resolution and Exhibit A
The impact statement does not reflect every adopted amendment

The published impact narrative describes the proposal before final passage. Use the adopted exhibit and approved amendments for the final rent and payment terms shown here.

Official record and adopted Exhibit A
One floor alternative has no separate filed artifact

The August 12 Green rent-escalator alternative appears in the meeting motion record, but no matching standalone file appears among the linked attachments.

August 12 meeting record
Can residents still participate?

Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.

Official Council agenda
03 · Verify it

Inspect the complete research record.

Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.

Official documents32 sources
Final legal actionResolution 37750

The operative official record after Council action.

Open at Portland.gov
Show 26 more documents
Amendment, not moved - Avalos 5Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Amendment, not moved - Avalos 9Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Amendment, not moved- Avalos 3Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Approved amendment - Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 1 (August 12, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Approved amendment - Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2 (August 12, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Approved amendment - Novick 2 (August 12, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Approved technical amendment (August 12, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Exhibit A - as amended (August 12, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Avalos 1 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Avalos 6 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Avalos 7 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Avalos 8 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Green-Avalos 1 strikethrough-underline version (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Kanal 1 (August 5, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Kanal 2 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Kanal 3 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Kanal 4 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Morillo 1 (August 5, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Morillo/Kanal 1 (August 12, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Failed amendment - Novick 1 (August 6, 2026)Amendment · observed Aug 13, 2026Exhibit A - originalExhibit · observed Aug 13, 20262023 Economic Impact AnalysisFiscal Analysis · observed Aug 13, 2026Supplemental Information - Chief Financial Officer's July 2026 MemoOther · observed Aug 13, 2026facility condition assessmentOther · observed Aug 13, 2026PresentationPresentation · observed Aug 13, 2026TestimonyTestimony · observed Aug 13, 2026
Read the full official text

WHEREAS, the Portland Trail Blazers of the National Basketball Association are a city treasure, providing civic pride, identity, joy, as well as meaningful economic activity to the city of Portland, metropolitan region, and state of Oregon; andWHEREAS, the City of Portland and Oregon Arena Corporation entered into a series of agreements in the early 1990s that led to the development of the Rose Quarter as we now know it, including construction of the Rose Garden Arena (now Moda Center), an entertainment complex building and several public and private parking structures; andWHEREAS, Rip City Management LLC is the successor entity to Oregon Arena Corporation and continues to operate both the Moda Center and the Veterans Memorial Coliseum today; andWHEREAS, a key agreement is the Arena Ground Lease which became effective when the new arena opened on October 12, 1995, and provided that at the end of the original lease term in 2025, ownership of the arena would transfer to the City; and WHEREAS, consistent with the provisions of the Arena Ground Lease, ownership of Moda Center was transferred to the City in 2024 as part of establishing a new Arena Operating Lease which extended the Portland Trail Blazers' commitment to play in Moda Center through the 2029-2030 NBA season; and WHEREAS, the Arena Operating Lease will expire, unless extended, on October 11, 2030; and WHEREAS, the Rose Quarter (Moda Center and Veterans Memorial Coliseum) is the premiere event complex in the state of Oregon, hosting over 260 events and attracting more than 1.7 million people to Portland's Central City each year; and WHEREAS, as of 2023, the combined economic impact of Moda Center and Rose Quarter events is estimated to be over $600 million in annual economic output each year, supporting nearly 6,000 jobs; andWHEREAS, it is critically important to both Portland, the metropolitan region, and the state of Oregon that the arenas at the Rose Quarter continue to be successfully operated and that Moda Center remains the home court for the Portland Trail Blazers; andWHERAS, Moda Center is over thirty years old, is one of the older NBA arenas yet to undergo a comprehensive renovation, and will need significant reinvestment to remain competitive in the league; and WHEREAS, Moda Center has been well maintained and remains in good operating condition, but many systems are original to the building and will require replacement in the coming years to allow continued operations; andWHEREAS, Moda Center requires a variety of upgrades to continue serving both as an NBA arena, and also successfully host a wide variety of other events including WNBA games, NCAA games, concerts and family shows; andWHEREAS, prior to acquiring Moda Center in 2024, the City commissioned a facility condition assessment of the arena that recommended phased investment of roughly $500 million would be required to keep the arena operating in good condition for 20 more years; andWHEREAS, as a City-owned facility, should the current lease expire without extension or replacement with a new long-term lease, funding facility upgrades will become a City-responsibility without the participation of identified funding partners; andWHEREAS, the City and Rip City Management LLC have been working in good faith to develop the framework for a long-term deal that would fund a major renovation of Moda Center and secure a new lease to keep the team in Portland for 20 or more years; and WHEREAS, the City alone is not able to provide the public financial support necessary for the major renovation necessary to secure a new long-term deal; and WHEREAS, in the 2026 Legislative session the State of Oregon passed Senate Bill 1501 authorizing the state to enter into a new Oregon Arena Joint Authority (Joint Authority) with one or more public bodies to renovate and oversee operations at Moda Center; andWHEREAS, Senate Bill 1501 authorized the state to issue debt instruments not to exceed $365 million in net proceeds to support construction and renovation of the Moda Center with conditions; andWHEREAS, Senate Bill 1501 states that the state may not issue any debt instrument unless, among other things, the Joint Authority has executed one or more agreements with Rip City Management or another management entity with a binding commitment to lease the Moda Center for a minimum of 20 years; andWHEREAS, Senate Bill 1501 states that the state may not issue any debt instrument unless, among other things, the Joint Authority has approved the project and has final approval of scope, schedule and budget for construction or renovation related to the Moda Center; andWHEREAS, Senate Bill 1501 states that the state may not issue any debt instrument unless, among other things, the Joint Authority has determined that the City of Portland and Multnomah County have made binding and substantial commitments to finance construction, renovation, maintenance and deferred maintenance of the Moda Center; andWHEREAS, the City Council held Work Sessions on June 24, 2026, and July 30, 2026, to discuss priorities for the lease agreement and associated public investment for renovation and learn about the process; andWHEREAS, as of July 30, 2026, the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners is working to confirm its financial commitment to the project as outlined in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City, Joint Authority, State, County and Rip City Management to enter into a long-term deal that will provide for the continued public ownership of the Moda Center, and allow the City to make a binding and substantial commitment to the construction, renovation, maintenance and deferred maintenance of the Moda Center; andWHEREAS, in a July 10, 2026 memo shared with the City Council on July 13, 2026, (included as supplemental information), the City's Chief Financial Officer: 1) provided City Council and the City's governmental and private partners with confidence that the City can meet the original funding commitment to renovate the City-owned Moda Center and maintain the Trail Blazers as a long-term anchor tenant, should the initially proposed funding scenario not materialize; 2) presented information on possible financing scenarios, of which there are multiple options that could be explored; and 3) anticipated the City will continue to pursue any other legal and potentially feasible funding opportunities that may develop; andWHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to reinvest certain revenues generated by the Moda Center into sustaining improvements to the arena beyond the renovation, and ensure that the Trail Blazers play at Moda Center for a minimum of 20 years; andWHEREAS, user fee revenue the City receives from Moda Center events, parking for events, and other Rose Quarter related revenues may be explicitly dedicated for Moda Center capital investments and improvements; andWHEREAS, all financial contributions for the Moda Center renovation project consistent with the formal definitive documents as approved by the City Council will subsequently be allocated through the regular City budget process; andWHEREAS, in the interest of moving this conversation forward efficiently and with a high level of transparency, on July 16, 2026, the City provided a draft term sheet similar in form to that attached as Exhibit A to Rip City Management LLC and Trail Blazers Holdings, LLC, and also made the draft Term Sheet publicly available.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Portland City Council affirms its support for the proposed Term Sheet to renovate Moda Center and keep the Portland Trail Blazers playing there for a minimum of 20 more years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to sign the Moda Center – Arena Renovation and Post-Renovation Operations Term Sheet in a form substantially similar to that attached as Exhibit A, but not to commit to use of any specific funding source; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Portland City Council directs the City Administration to work with Rip City Management, LLC, Trail Blazers Holdings, LLC, the State of Oregon and the Oregon Arena Joint Authority to develop formal definitive documents and amendments to existing agreements as necessitated by the terms contained in Exhibit A, but not to commit to use of any specific funding source; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Portland City Council directs the City Administration to negotiate final agreements that deliver a return on investment for the City's financial contributions to the Moda Renovation, through a combination of terms and community benefits; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Portland City Council directs the City Administration to negotiate final agreements that provide the City with rights, remedies, protections, and enforcement authorities comparable to those contained in the existing Bridge Agreement; andBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Portland City Council will consider formal definitive documents and amendments to existing agreements as contemplated by the terms contained in Exhibit A no later than December 31, 2026.

Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes3 meetings · 18 votes

Recorded amendments

Aug 12, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend the Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2 amendment to Exhibit A to replace the rent key term on page 4 with "Rip City will pay rent in the amount of $2,000,000 during each year of the term escalated by the maximum allowable rate established annually as allowed by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services pursuant to ORS 90.324": Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 12, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend the resolution as shown in Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 1: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Aug 12, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend the Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Aug 12, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Novick 2: Moved by Novick and seconded by Green. (Aye (7): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan)

Aug 12, 2026 · Withdrawn

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. Motion withdrawn.

Aug 12, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo/Kanal 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 12, 2026 · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in the technical amendment: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A and impact statement as shown in Green-Avalos 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Kanal; Nay (8): Morillo, Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 3: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 8: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Kanal 4: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass. Continued to August 12, 2026 at 9:30 am

Read all 18 exact motions
Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend the Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2 amendment to Exhibit A to replace the rent key term on page 4 with "Rip City will pay rent in the amount of $2,000,000 during each year of the term escalated by the maximum allowable rate established annually as allowed by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services pursuant to ORS 90.324": Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend the resolution as shown in Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 1: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend the Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Novick 2: Moved by Novick and seconded by Green. (Aye (7): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan)

Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Withdrawn

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. Motion withdrawn.

Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo/Kanal 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 12, 2026 · Amendment · Recorded

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in the technical amendment: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A and impact statement as shown in Green-Avalos 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Kanal; Nay (8): Morillo, Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 3: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 8: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Aug 6, 2026 · Amendment · Failed

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Kanal 4: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass. Continued to August 12, 2026 at 9:30 am

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 12, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend the Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2 amendment to Exhibit A to replace the rent key term on page 4 with "Rip City will pay rent in the amount of $2,000,000 during each year of the term escalated by the maximum allowable rate established annually as allowed by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services pursuant to ORS 90.324": Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 12, 202612 yes

Motion to amend the resolution as shown in Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 1: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 12, 202612 yes

Motion to amend the Exhibit A as shown in Dunphy/Pirtle-Guiney/Ryan/Kanal 2: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Clark. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 12, 20267 yes · 5 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Novick 2: Moved by Novick and seconded by Green. (Aye (7): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (5): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan)

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 12, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo/Kanal 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal, Dunphy; Nay (6): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 12, 202612 yes

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in the technical amendment: Moved by Dunphy and seconded by Smith. (Aye (12): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Kanal, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy)

Final Council action · Aug 12, 20268 yes · 4 no

Final action on 2026-280: Authorize a non-binding term sheet with Rip City Management LLC and Trail Blazers Holdings, LLC outlining the terms for Moda Center arena renovation, operating and lease agreements that will keep the Portland Trail Blazers playing in Portland for at least 20 more years

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A and impact statement as shown in Green-Avalos 1: Moved by Green and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Kanal 1: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Morillo 1: Moved by Morillo and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20264 yes · 8 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Novick 1: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (4): Koyama Lane, Novick, Green, Kanal; Nay (8): Morillo, Clark, Zimmerman, Avalos, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 3: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Novick. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Kanal 2: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 1: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Morillo. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 6: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 7: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20265 yes · 7 no

Motion to amend Exhibit A as shown in Avalos 8: Moved by Avalos and seconded by Koyama Lane. (Aye (5): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (7): Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass.

Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Aug 6, 20266 yes · 6 no

Motion to amend Resolution as shown in Kanal 4: Moved by Kanal and seconded by Avalos. (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Green, Avalos, Kanal; Nay (6): Clark, Zimmerman, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney, Ryan, Dunphy). Motion failed to pass. Continued to August 12, 2026 at 9:30 am

Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Why technical findings are hidden above

Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.

Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats

This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.

Decision definition

The official title and operative text identify the requested action.

Complete
Official legal text

Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.

Complete
Financial impact

The official impact statement includes financial information.

Complete
Funding source

The impact statement explicitly leaves one or more funding sources unresolved.

Unknown
Supporting documents

31 linked supporting documents found; presence alone does not verify their internal completeness.

Complete
Referenced exhibit integrity

The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.

Unknown
Counterparty acceptance

The action is expressly non-binding; executed acceptance by every named counterparty is not established by this check.

Unknown
Implementation

A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.

Complete
Document stability

Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.

Unknown
Source record
First discovered
Aug 13, 2026, 1:03 PM PDT
Last checked
Sep 16, 2026, 4:08 PM PDT
Evidence hash
a61f7dc37d6eb84c
Guide status
Source-reviewed synthesis
Append-only timeline
  1. SOURCE UPDATED

    Adopted as amended by council

  2. DOCUMENT PUBLISHED

    Observed in the official source.

  3. Council Action

    Adopted as amended

  4. Council Action

    Adopted as amended

  5. Council Action

    Continued

  6. Council Action

    Continued