The purpose is to allow the Children’s Levy to award a total of $70,976,000 million to early childhood, after school, mentoring, child abuse prevention and intervention, foster care and hunger relief programs as outlined in the memo entitled “Request for City Council Approval” and “Exhibit A: “Portland Children’s Levy Funding Allocations July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028.”
Official proposal and impact statementWhat is Portland deciding about repeal one-year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy for FY 2025-26 and approve funding recommendations of Children’s Levy…
The purpose is to allow the Children’s Levy to award a total of $70,976,000 million to early childhood, after school, mentoring, child abuse prevention and intervention, foster care and hunger relief programs as outlined in the memo entitled “Request for City Council Approval” and “Exhibit A: “Portland Children’s Levy Funding Allocations July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028.”
Official impact statementSee the official legal title
*Repeal one-year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy for FY 2025-26 and approve funding recommendations of Children’s Levy Allocation Committee for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028 (repeal Ordinance 192065)
What this proposal would actually do.
Plain-language orientation first. Every substantive statement below links to its official basis.
The reviewed sources do not clearly identify every existing policy, service, contract, or obligation that would remain unchanged.
Official matter recordThis proposal concerns arts, parks & community life and requires action through Portland’s public legislative process.
Official matter classification and recordCommunity ImpactsChildren and families disproportionately impacted by historical inequities gain access to culturally specific and responsive program services funded by the Children’s Levy. All services contribute to achieving established Children’s Levy goals outlined in the table below and support children, youth and parents to achieve positive outcomes. In FY24, 77% of the children served in programs supported by the Children’s Levy identified as Black, Indigenous or of color. PCL’s annual community report and data appendix provide more data on the community impact of currently funded programs.Children’s Levy GoalsLevy-widePrepare children for school.Support children’s success inside and outside of school.Eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in children’s well-being and school success. Early ChildhoodSupport children’s early development and readiness for kindergarten.Child Abuse Prevention and InterventionPrevent child abuse and neglect and support vulnerable families.Foster CareSupport the well-being and development of children and youth in foster care.After SchoolProvide safe and constructive after-school and summer programing that supports children’s well-being and school success.MentoringConnect children and youth with caring adult role models that support their well-being.Hunger ReliefExpand access to healthy, nutritious food for hungry children.Community InvolvementPlease see memo submitted with Document number 2025-207 for more detail. Briefly, in 2023-24, PCL worked Camille E. Trummer Consulting, and City contracted Community Engagement Liaisons to conduct a community engagement process as required by the ballot measure and Act (Resolution 37610) referring the Levy to voters. Community engagement activities were designed to identify community funding priorities in early childhood, child abuse prevention/intervention, foster youth, afterschool, mentoring and hunger relief program areas. More than 500 community members and 150 service providers participated in the community engagement process through surveys, focus groups and interviews. Participants engaged in the process in more than 25 languages, and included youth and parents with disabilities, foster youth and foster parents, immigrants and refugees, and people who identify as Black, Indigenous and of color.PCL’s 13-member Community Council helped design the community engagement process and distill the funding priorities based on the results. They also worked with staff to develop the funding application and scoring criteria. The community engagement results, and draft application and scoring criteria were also shared with agencies providing services to children and families to provide feedback. PCL conducted significant outreach to organizations providing services for children and families, and received 168 applications in the funding round (45% increase compared to 2019 funding round). The number of applicants that were not currently funded by PCL increased by more than 200% compared to the 2019 funding round. Submitted applications were scored by 91 trained community volunteers (4 per application). The Community Council reviewed characteristics of the applicant pool (program area, focus populations, size of applicant organization and current PCL funding status) and further prioritized application characteristics for funding. Staff developed funding recommendations based on these priorities, application score, program feasibility, past performance for currently funded programs, assuring a diversity of organizations to serve the community and balancing services for priority populations. After receiving application scores and staff recommendations, applicants had the option to submit testimony (written, or audio/video recording) in support of their applications to the Allocation Committee. Testimony was provided to Allocation Committee members in advance of funding decisions.The Children’s Levy assumes that applicants may testify before City Council regarding this item, but does not have specific knowledge of who or how many.
Official community impact statementWhat the record establishes and what it does not.
Votes show choices. They do not, by themselves, prove why a member made that choice.
Passed · 12–0
Read the exact motion or vote question
Final action on 2025-264: *Repeal one-year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy for FY 2025-26 and approve funding recommendations of Children’s Levy Allocation Committee for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028 (repeal Ordinance 192065)
We will not turn the roll call into invented arguments.
The vote above establishes who supported or opposed that exact motion. A source-validated account of the competing reasons will appear only after human review of the meeting transcript and documents.
There are no costs to the City general fund. Children’s Levy revenues are generated by a special property tax levy and the proceeds of the levy will fund the proposed allocations. The current levy runs July 2024 through June 2029. The legislation will result in 95 new grant agreements with non-profit, 501(c)(3) corporations, local education agencies, community colleges and/or universities.
Official financial impact statement- The source-linked record has not yet received a human review of competing arguments. A yes or no vote alone does not establish a Councilor’s rationale.
- What implementation evidence will show whether the intended result occurred?
Official testimony on this decision has closed. Residents can still contact their district Councilors about implementation and follow-up.
Official Council agendaInspect the complete research record.
Official text, source files, exact motions, roll calls, provenance, and the technical completeness check remain available without crowding the explanation above.
Official documents1 sources
The operative official record after Council action.
Open at Portland.govRead the full official text
The City of Portland ordains.Section 1. The Council finds:The City proposed and voters approved a local option property tax levy at the November 5, 2002, general election to fund programs to help children in Portland. The levy created the Portland Children’s Levy to make targeted investments in proven programs.In May 2023, voters approved a fourth renewal of the local property tax levy to continue supporting the Portland Children’s Levy to invest in proven programs in the areas of early childhood, child abuse prevention and intervention, foster care, after-school, mentoring and hunger relief. A five-person citizen Allocation Committee was created to make recommendations regarding the expenditure of levy funds.On April 23, 2025, the Allocation Committee voted to fund the early childhood, child abuse prevention and intervention, foster care, hunger relief, afterschool, and mentoring programs set forth in Exhibit A.On June 4, 2025, the Council meeting agenda included an ordinance titled “Approve funding recommendations of Children’s Levy Allocation Committee for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028” (Document number 2025-207). Council voted to remand the ordinance. Council then suspended the rules to consider and approve Ordinance 192065, which provided a one-year extension of existing funding for the Portland Children’s Levy.Council has decided to repeal Ordinance 192065 and approve the original funding recommendations of the Allocation Committee contained in Document number 2025-207.NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:Repeal Ordinance 192065.Rescind the decision to remand Document number 2025-207.The funding recommendations made by the Children’s Levy Allocation Committee described in Exhibit A are approved. The Director is authorized to enter into agreements, which shall be effective as of July 1, 2025, awarding grants substantially similar to those contemplated in the Allocation Committee funding recommendations to the organization identified in the funding recommendations identified in Exhibit A.In the event that any grantee becomes unwilling or unable to use City grant funds in a manner consistent with a grant agreement that is authorized by this ordinance, the Director is hereby authorized to terminate the grant agreement in accordance with its terms, and execute a new grant agreement with a different grantee provided that (1) the funding allocated for the new grant agreement is equal to the amount of unspent funds allocated by this ordinance for the terminated agreement, and (2) the scope of work stated in the new agreement is substantially the same as the scope of work in the terminated agreement.Direct the Allocation Committee to include a summary of how it addressed or plans to address concerns raised by Council during the remand process, including consideration of racial equity impacts, scoring inconsistencies, and testimony from applicants. The summary should also describe how the Allocation Committee assessed whether the programs serve a majority of the intended demographic population, defined as more than 51%, particularly in the case of culturally specific or responsive grants. The Committee shall also include a plan to discuss how to clearly assess and value the extent to which an applicant's leadership and board composition reflect the populations they intend to serve.Section 2. The Council declares that an emergency exists in order to avoid a disruption in funding for this important work; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.
Meetings, motions, amendments, and votes1 meetings · 3 votes
Read all 2 exact motions
Motion to suspend the rules to add an ordinance to the agenda: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Motion to replace Finding 5 with “Council has decided to repeal Ordinance 192065. Council anticipates receiving recommendations from the Allocation Committee in response to the remand of Document Number 2025-207 in the near future.”, delete Directives B, C, and D, and replace Section 2 with “The Council declares that an emergency exists in order to avoid disruption and funding for this important work; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.” Moved by Morillo and seconded by Green (Aye (6): Koyama Lane, Morillo, Green, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith; Nay (6): Kanal, Ryan, Novick, Clark, Zimmerman, Pirtle-Guiney). Motion failed to pass.
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 25, 202512 yes
Motion to suspend the rules to add an ordinance to the agenda: Moved by Novick and seconded by Kanal. (Aye (12): Kanal, Ryan, Koyama Lane, Morillo, Novick, Clark, Green, Zimmerman, Avalos, Dunphy, Smith, Pirtle-Guiney)
Meeting-level motion or recommendation · Jun 25, 20256 yes · 6 no
Motion to replace Finding 5 with “Council has decided to repeal Ordinance 192065. Council anticipates receiving recommendations from the Allocation Committee in response to the remand of Document Number 2025-207 in the near future.”, delete Directives B, C, and D, and replace Section 2 with “The Council declares that an emergency exists in order to avoid disruption and funding for this important work; therefore, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the C
Final Council action · Jun 25, 202512 yes · 0 no
Final action on 2025-264: *Repeal one-year extension of funding for Portland Children’s Levy for FY 2025-26 and approve funding recommendations of Children’s Levy Allocation Committee for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028 (repeal Ordinance 192065)
Data quality, timeline, and provenanceRules v2
Unreviewed keyword matches and machine-extracted fragments are not presented as authoritative findings. Only 0 human-reviewed findings are available for this matter.
Technical information-completeness check · Ready With Caveats
This checks whether decision-relevant categories appear in the published packet. It does not recommend approval or opposition.
The official title and operative text identify the requested action.
Official text was found. This check does not certify that every referenced exhibit is complete.
The official impact statement includes financial information.
The impact statement identifies funding information without an explicit unresolved-source qualifier.
No linked attachments were found on the official page.
The text references exhibits. This guide has not yet automatically verified that each referenced exhibit is present, populated, and internally consistent.
The reviewed action is not expressly identified as a non-binding agreement.
A direction, reporting requirement, or deadline appears in the official text.
Stability requires at least two observed snapshots; the system will update this after another ingestion.
- First discovered
- Aug 13, 2026, 1:13 PM PDT
- Last checked
- Sep 13, 2026, 2:32 AM PDT
- Evidence hash
- c0002f69f50a3215
- Guide status
- Deterministic baseline
- SOURCE UPDATED
Passed
- DOCUMENT PUBLISHED
Observed in the official source.
- Council Action
Passed