Final-action roll calls · January 2025 → today
Who votes together, and where.
Explore each councilor’s record by topic, the pairs that repeatedly align on divided votes, and the issues where Council finds the most and least agreement. Every pattern is linked back to the public record.
321final actions analyzed
Issue landscape
Ranked by share of divided final actionsWhere Council divides most.
A divided vote contains at least one yes and one no. A higher rate means Council divided more often on matters in that topic, not that every disagreement was equally consequential.
01
Public safety14 divided · 37 final actions
38%02Housing & homelessness6 divided · 29 final actions
21%03Transportation & public works14 divided · 69 final actions
20%04Arts, parks & community life1 divided · 5 final actions
20%05Government & democracy6 divided · 32 final actions
19%06Economy & business2 divided · 11 final actions
18%07Budget, taxes & finance10 divided · 59 final actions
17%08Climate & environment3 divided · 20 final actions
15%09Labor & city workforce3 divided · 21 final actions
14%10Land use & permitting2 divided · 18 final actions
11%Selected issue record
Other City business
Official matters that do not yet fit one of the public policy groupings above.
30%of final actions were divided6 of 20 roll calls
14 no recorded dissent 6 divided1 decided within two votes
Councilor by councilor
Tap any councilor for their full recordThe voting record on other.
A yes rate is not a “pro-topic” score: each roll call asks a different question. These cards report how each member voted on the proposals grouped here.
Candace AvalosDistrict 1
- Yes
- 19
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 19
Jamie DunphyDistrict 1
- Yes
- 19
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 20
Loretta SmithDistrict 1
- Yes
- 16
- No
- 3
- Participated
- 19
Dan RyanDistrict 2
- Yes
- 15
- No
- 3
- Participated
- 18
Elana Pirtle-GuineyDistrict 2
- Yes
- 19
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 20
Sameer KanalDistrict 2
- Yes
- 17
- No
- 3
- Participated
- 20
Angelita MorilloDistrict 3
- Yes
- 18
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 19
Steve NovickDistrict 3
- Yes
- 19
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 19
Tiffany Koyama LaneDistrict 3
- Yes
- 19
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 19
Eric ZimmermanDistrict 4
- Yes
- 17
- No
- 2
- Participated
- 19
Mitch GreenDistrict 4
- Yes
- 20
- No
- 0
- Participated
- 20
Olivia ClarkDistrict 4
- Yes
- 18
- No
- 1
- Participated
- 19
Implicit voting coalitions
Divided other votes onlyWho lands on the same side.
These are observed voting alignments, not claims of an organized or explicit coalition. The calculation adjusts for each member’s underlying tendency to vote yes.
Most aligned pairs
100%voted together
6 of 6 shared divided votes
100%voted together
5 of 5 shared divided votes
80%voted together
4 of 5 shared divided votes
80%voted together
4 of 5 shared divided votes
Most often on opposite sides
0%voted together
0 of 6 shared divided votes
0%voted together
0 of 5 shared divided votes
20%voted together
1 of 5 shared divided votes
The underlying decisions
Search all votes Recent divided matters.
- 7–5yes–no
- 9–1yes–no
- 8–3yes–no
- 2025-499Should Portland adopt Homelessness Response System Action Plan and Key Performance Indicators?9–3yes–no
- 2025-420Should Portland authorize Council to continue operating under the current City Code Chapter 3.02?8–2yes–no